boiled milk

boiled milk — CS2 Stats

76561198297076275[U:1:336810547]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

649Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,488Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,399), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate34.5%41.3%41.9%7.3% short
Shot accuracy12.5%12.6%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.070.950.98above
Match win rate45.2%42.5%43.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGboiled milkFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning48
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43525Last 10043%Win rateLLWWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.3

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.8
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time585ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–2 · poseidon, 21 May
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · cache, 23 May
406msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · cache, 7 Jul
13–1Biggest win · office, 5 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 60% over 5dust2Weakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB23121152%0.01
infernoC167944%-0.01
mirageC125742%-0.01
dust2D102820%-0.03
officeB84450%-0.03
vertigoD72529%0.00
nukeC52340%-0.01
trainA53260%0.00
ancient42250%-0.03
anubis32167%0.02
overpass3030%0.02
warden21150%0.02
poseidon21150%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

66,357Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players
4,109Matches
45.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
34.5%Headshot %
12.5%Shot accuracy
5,497MVPs
1,488Hours (in match)
2,225Bombs planted
751Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,441inferno
3,607dust2
2,062nuke
1,827vertigo
954train
735cbble
732office
148italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
575msReaction time
39.0%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
14.97HE damage / grenade
7.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.9815% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–13-0.0413%20 Sept
cache4–13-0.0425%20 Sept
vertigo13–20.0319%20 Sept
nuke13–40.1025%20 Sept
dust213–11-0.0512%19 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0313%19 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0410%19 Sept
cache8–0-0.005%19 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0413%13 Sept
cache10–13-0.0510%13 Sept
cache5–13-0.0117%12 Sept
train11–130.019%12 Sept
dust26–13-0.0416%12 Sept
vertigo12–12-0.0315%12 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0116%8 Sept
mirage13–7-0.029%8 Sept
dust213–50.0210%8 Sept
train13–30.0113%7 Sept
cache13–80.0317%6 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0019%6 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0214%6 Sept
mirage13–50.0330%6 Sept
office4–13-0.0431%6 Sept
inferno2–8-0.0117%6 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0924%6 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0220%15 Aug
cache13–50.0421%22 Jul
office10–13-0.0618%18 Jul
cache11–13-0.0012%18 Jul
train13–8-0.0115%17 Jul
cache13–90.0623%15 Jul
office3–13-0.0112%15 Jul
cache3–13-0.0221%8 Jul
dust26–130.0122%8 Jul
cache13–100.0119%7 Jul
mirage13–100.0111%7 Jul
cache13–70.0316%7 Jul
inferno10–130.0314%7 Jul
cache13–50.0317%7 Jul
cache13–40.0120%6 Jul
overpass11–130.0321%6 Jul
train13–50.0317%6 Jul
warden13–110.0514%6 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0111%5 Jul
office13–1-0.0436%5 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0411%5 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0218%4 Jul
cache7–13-0.0513%4 Jul
office13–8-0.0213%3 Jul
overpass6–130.0416%3 Jul
cache5–13-0.0316%3 Jul
inferno13–90.0211%1 Jul
anubis13–90.0715%1 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0218%1 Jul
cache9–13-0.0312%23 May
cache9–130.0418%23 May
cache7–13-0.0235%23 May
vertigo13–70.0221%23 May
cache13–10.0543%23 May
mirage10–130.0021%23 May
inferno13–100.0318%22 May
cache13–60.0943%22 May
mirage13–30.0416%22 May
inferno5–13-0.0315%22 May
mirage9–13-0.0626%22 May
mirage5–13-0.0612%22 May
poseidon7–9-0.0312%22 May
inferno5–13-0.0619%22 May
mirage7–13-0.0727%22 May
dust27–13-0.044%22 May
train8–13-0.0213%22 May
office11–13-0.0118%22 May
cache13–40.1318%22 May
poseidon9–20.1318%21 May
office13–11-0.0216%21 May
office13–10-0.0516%18 May
warden9–13-0.0031%18 May
cache13–100.0119%2 May
cache5–13-0.0517%2 May
overpass7–13-0.0117%18 Apr
mirage13–60.0832%18 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0732%18 Apr
vertigo9–130.0317%18 Apr
dust28–13-0.0913%15 Apr
ancient13–60.0320%13 Apr
dust28–13-0.0216%13 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0117%6 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0614%6 Apr
vertigo1–10-0.035%6 Apr
vertigo12–12-0.0911%5 Apr
inferno13–110.0418%5 Apr
dust29–13-0.0213%5 Apr
inferno13–7-0.049%5 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0219%5 Apr
dust212–12-0.0122%29 Mar
anubis13–110.0112%29 Mar
inferno13–70.0313%22 Mar
inferno9–13-0.027%22 Mar
vertigo12–120.0921%21 Mar
dust26–13-0.077%21 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →