Rawo

Rawo — CS2 Stats

AT76561198295298211[U:1:335032483]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

882Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,535Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,287Top 50% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53510 of 261666 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Nov 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,287 -2,211 16 Aug – 10 Nov · 12 days played
21,87924,498peak 24,49816 Aug10 Nov
24,716Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-08-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,211 below peak (24,498)
  • -439 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,211 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,713 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,878), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate35.1%46.8%48.2%13.1% short
Shot accuracy15.1%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.321.061.07above
Match win rate63.1%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRawoFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,287 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning52
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateWLWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · +67ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.2
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time517ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 505ms → last ⅓ avg 517ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 6 Sept →
63%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · inferno, 27 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · inferno, 27 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 30 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 14anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2412–1250%-0.02
infernoC2310–1343%-0.02
ancientA1810–856%-0.01
cacheS1410–471%-0.00
anubisD72–529%-0.02
nukeD62–433%-0.03
mirage—42–250%-0.05
poseidon—20–20%-0.12
debris—10–10%-0.11
vertigo—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,419Lifetime kills
1.32K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
3,681Matches
63.1%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 8 players
35.1%Headshot %
15.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
5,996MVPs
1,029Hours (in match)
3,240Bombs planted
566Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

11,196dust2
3,379inferno
1,750vertigo
1,138nuke
330train
172office
134italy
104dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

122Matches
56%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
69.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23145%0.9413.9
Inferno2976%0.9712.6
Ancient2055%0.9914.7
Cache1553%0.8612.7
Anubis944%0.8215.7
Nuke838%0.7413.9
Overpass786%1.1716.6
Mirage20%0.8214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.0%Spray accuracy
88.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
519msReaction time
40.0%T opening success
44.0%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
11.27HE damage / grenade
5.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.9681% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–7-0.0123%10 Nov →
inferno14–160.0015%10 Nov →
cache13–7-0.0214%10 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.050%29 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.028%29 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0825%28 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0218%28 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0113%28 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0521%28 Oct →
anubis13–60.0212%28 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.1063%27 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0117%26 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.049%26 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.026%26 Oct →
inferno13–20.0815%20 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0312%20 Oct →
inferno13–110.0327%20 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0612%19 Oct →
ancient4–9-0.0113%19 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0214%19 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0619%19 Oct →
cache13–50.0816%13 Oct →
dust213–30.0315%13 Oct →
inferno13–20.0511%13 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0613%13 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.018%12 Oct →
ancient13–110.0217%12 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0123%12 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0616%11 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0623%11 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0512%6 Oct →
ancient13–160.0117%6 Oct →
ancient13–80.009%5 Oct →
cache13–11-0.047%5 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0118%5 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.044%5 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0121%1 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0119%1 Oct →
nuke9–20.0613%23 Sept →
debris7–9-0.117%23 Sept →
nuke5–90.0113%23 Sept →
poseidon3–9-0.124%23 Sept →
vertigo9–30.0424%23 Sept →
poseidon3–9-0.1112%23 Sept →
anubis0–13-0.068%23 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0123%20 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0610%20 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0217%15 Sept →
inferno13–110.0011%15 Sept →
cache13–50.0219%15 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0416%15 Sept →
dust214–160.0114%13 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.048%13 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0113%13 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0313%7 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0318%7 Sept →
ancient13–30.1112%6 Sept →
dust219–22-0.0320%6 Sept →
cache13–90.018%6 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0117%6 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0215%6 Sept →
inferno7–130.0219%2 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.029%2 Sept →
dust213–7-0.029%2 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.058%2 Sept →
cache1–13-0.1010%2 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0017%1 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0010%1 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.087%1 Sept →
cache13–70.0830%1 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0216%1 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.018%1 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0528%31 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0513%30 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.035%30 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0020%30 Aug →
dust213–10.0617%30 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0330%30 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0610%16 Aug →
inferno13–70.008%16 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.1418%16 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0118%16 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0429%16 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0114%13 Aug →
cache16–130.029%13 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0522%13 Aug →
cache13–80.0322%13 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.028%13 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0116%12 Aug →
dust211–130.0524%12 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0711%9 Aug →
dust213–90.0714%9 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0316%9 Aug →
cache14–16-0.0322%9 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0417%9 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.016%9 Aug →
dust219–16-0.0216%5 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0321%5 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0315%5 Aug →
cache11–13-0.037%5 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.