Shoumei

Shoumei — CS2 Stats

76561198294551550[U:1:334285822]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

262Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,400Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating16,187Purple band · top ~23.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (52 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,187 -3,362 13 Sept – 23 Sept · 28 days played
16,16021,365peak 21,36513 Sept23 Sept
21,424Peak Premier in tracked matches
66Days played since 2025-06-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,178 below peak (21,365)
  • -251 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,813 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.8%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy13.6%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.831.021.030.20 short
Match win rate35.7%44.7%45.2%9.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShoumeiFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,187 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning61
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateWLTLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility3.1
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch7.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.1
Utility3.1
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time572ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 16 Nov →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · anubis, 30 Apr →
422msFastest reaction time · 15–15 · cache, 19 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 65% over 20anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2013–765%0.01
mirageC197–1237%0.02
nukeA1710–759%0.04
dust2D134–931%0.04
anubisD103–730%-0.00
cacheC104–640%0.01
overpassB63–350%0.02
inferno—31–233%0.03
train—22–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

31,100Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
1,978Matches
35.7%Match win rate
44.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
13.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
3,953MVPs
3,400Hours (in match)
1,598Bombs planted
486Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,219dust2
1,367inferno
912nuke
416cbble
391vertigo
276train
24shorttrain
22office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

95Matches
56%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
80.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

59%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis757%1.1618.0
Ancient757%1.1919.1
Nuke683%1.0413.7
Mirage425%1.4422.3
Cache3100%1.1324.0
Dust2250%1.4415.0
Vertigo2100%1.2215.5
Inferno250%0.6810.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
88.4%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
560msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
55.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
1.54HE damage / grenade
5.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1925% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–10.1218%23 Sept →
anubis10–130.0119%23 Sept →
anubis15–150.0514%17 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0420%10 Sept →
cache6–130.0226%8 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0711%7 Sept →
ancient13–70.0927%5 Sept →
nuke10–130.1221%2 Sept →
cache13–90.0524%30 Aug →
anubis13–70.0511%29 Aug →
mirage10–130.0417%24 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0711%22 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0017%19 Aug →
cache25–220.0320%18 Aug →
cache8–130.0729%13 Aug →
anubis16–130.0213%11 Aug →
nuke13–60.0716%7 Aug →
cache13–100.0221%7 Aug →
ancient13–110.0411%6 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0616%3 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0516%1 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0212%1 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0823%31 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0727%31 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0127%31 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0316%23 Jul →
ancient13–110.056%22 Jul →
ancient13–110.0210%22 Jul →
dust26–130.0529%21 Jul →
ancient13–90.0125%16 Jul →
cache6–130.0017%13 Jul →
anubis9–130.0621%12 Jul →
cache11–130.0719%12 Jul →
dust211–130.0625%12 Jul →
ancient10–130.0322%10 Jul →
ancient13–110.0719%9 Jul →
mirage13–10.1223%14 May →
nuke8–130.0218%9 May →
ancient11–130.0721%9 May →
dust25–130.1029%7 May →
ancient13–70.0816%7 May →
mirage4–13-0.0624%6 May →
mirage13–80.0225%5 May →
nuke13–30.0237%5 May →
anubis13–90.0247%30 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0424%30 Apr →
nuke6–130.0316%7 Apr →
anubis2–13-0.1011%7 Apr →
train13–90.0221%17 Dec →
ancient6–13-0.0815%17 Dec →
overpass13–110.0214%17 Dec →
overpass13–20.0522%5 Dec →
mirage13–100.1025%28 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0228%28 Nov →
ancient3–13-0.0117%27 Nov →
dust214–160.0324%27 Nov →
ancient13–60.0421%26 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0222%26 Nov →
mirage13–100.0915%24 Nov →
nuke13–16-0.0216%21 Nov →
dust214–160.0115%21 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.0214%20 Nov →
nuke11–130.0318%17 Nov →
mirage15–15-0.0111%17 Nov →
dust213–40.1322%16 Nov →
nuke13–7-0.0116%16 Nov →
nuke13–70.0715%15 Nov →
train13–70.0626%15 Nov →
inferno14–160.0919%15 Nov →
nuke5–130.0218%15 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0325%15 Nov →
dust28–130.0117%14 Nov →
nuke13–50.0822%14 Nov →
nuke14–160.0417%10 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0419%29 Oct →
mirage13–50.0814%23 Oct →
overpass13–40.0425%23 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0422%8 Oct →
inferno13–110.0120%14 Sept →
dust213–100.0015%13 Sept →
overpass11–13-0.0416%13 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0117%10 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0021%10 Sept →
nuke16–130.0315%4 Sept →
mirage10–130.0115%4 Sept →
dust213–110.0715%20 Aug →
overpass8–130.044%17 Aug →
dust25–130.0620%14 Aug →
overpass10–130.0120%8 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0123%8 Aug →
mirage13–110.0818%7 Aug →
ancient13–110.039%1 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.029%31 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0218%30 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0318%30 Jul →
dust213–60.028%25 Jul →
mirage11–130.0020%25 Jul →
nuke13–90.0312%18 Jul →
mirage13–40.0635%18 Jul →
anubis7–130.0219%19 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.