bubblegum enjoyer

bubblegum enjoyer — CS2 Stats

DE76561198294426656[U:1:334160928]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,114Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,043Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#77579 of 233225 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 18 days played since 28 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 +3,547 29 Aug19 Sept · 15 days played
15,80520,653peak 20,65329 Aug19 Sept
20,653Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 654 below peak (20,653)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,399), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate45.2%41.3%41.9%above
Shot accuracy5.8%12.6%12.2%6.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.580.950.980.41 short
Match win rate45.1%42.5%43.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbubblegum enjoyerFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning28
Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY464212Last 10046%Win rateWTWWWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 401 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility1.4
Positioning2.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning2.8
Utility1.4
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time521ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–2 · eldorado, 1 Sept
47%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · eldorado, 1 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 9–4 · poseidon, 3 Sept
13–3Biggest win · dust2, 19 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 31% over 32
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD32102231%-0.05
ancientS108280%-0.05
vertigoB105550%-0.04
cacheA95456%-0.04
nukeC83538%-0.04
eldoradoC73443%-0.06
poseidonC73443%-0.04
anubisS65183%-0.03
mirageC52340%-0.03
dust242250%-0.06
overpass2020%-0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 32). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,496Lifetime kills
0.58K/D
2,838Matches
45.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
45.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
5.8%Shot accuracy
4,801MVPs
922Hours (in match)
2,293Bombs planted
384Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

8,489inferno
2,675vertigo
2,114dust2
1,164nuke
188train
171office
29italy
13cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

110Matches
38%Win rate
0.40Avg K/D
43.6ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient250%0.416.5
Inferno250%0.5611.5
Vertigo10%0.428.0
Nuke10%0.122.0
Train10%0.326.0
Cache10%0.254.0
Overpass10%0.314.0
Anubis10%0.315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.9%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
71.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
533msReaction time
18.0%T opening success
24.5%CT opening success
0.10Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
4.26HE damage / grenade
0.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.8756% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1011 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.0124% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 32 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–8-0.0117%19 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0118%19 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0413%19 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0526%19 Sept
dust213–3-0.0415%19 Sept
cache10–13-0.0415%19 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0419%19 Sept
inferno14–16-0.039%19 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0514%18 Sept
inferno3–1-0.120%18 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0713%18 Sept
inferno6–13-0.095%18 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0524%16 Sept
nuke7–13-0.087%16 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0516%16 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0915%14 Sept
inferno10–13-0.076%14 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0413%13 Sept
ancient8–13-0.099%13 Sept
inferno13–60.0218%13 Sept
inferno11–13-0.062%13 Sept
cache15–15-0.0322%13 Sept
ancient13–3-0.068%13 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0512%12 Sept
inferno5–130.0018%12 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0010%12 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0213%12 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0711%12 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0514%12 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0319%12 Sept
ancient13–8-0.059%11 Sept
cache13–7-0.0520%11 Sept
anubis13–3-0.005%11 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0215%11 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0611%11 Sept
ancient13–11-0.108%9 Sept
mirage13–6-0.016%9 Sept
inferno5–13-0.094%9 Sept
mirage7–13-0.068%9 Sept
cache13–8-0.0313%7 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0015%6 Sept
cache13–11-0.0413%6 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0214%6 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0215%6 Sept
inferno13–8-0.028%5 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0416%5 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0312%5 Sept
dust23–13-0.1013%4 Sept
nuke15–15-0.046%4 Sept
cache13–6-0.066%4 Sept
dust213–11-0.069%4 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0716%4 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0512%4 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0215%4 Sept
vertigo8–8-0.0719%4 Sept
inferno6–9-0.187%4 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0911%3 Sept
eldorado2–9-0.214%3 Sept
vertigo4–9-0.1814%3 Sept
inferno8–8-0.1028%3 Sept
vertigo9–70.1422%3 Sept
eldorado9–00.0817%3 Sept
inferno6–9-0.1418%3 Sept
poseidon9–40.0013%3 Sept
vertigo1–9-0.250%1 Sept
eldorado9–20.1547%1 Sept
inferno6–9-0.2120%1 Sept
eldorado9–20.0418%31 Aug
poseidon8–8-0.0327%31 Aug
vertigo9–6-0.0117%31 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0638%31 Aug
eldorado2–9-0.229%30 Aug
poseidon7–9-0.0712%30 Aug
inferno9–30.1116%30 Aug
poseidon9–50.0125%30 Aug
vertigo9–10.1218%30 Aug
cache9–13-0.0810%30 Aug
inferno8–80.0312%30 Aug
nuke8–130.0714%30 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0413%30 Aug
cache13–9-0.004%30 Aug
cache7–13-0.0313%29 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0112%29 Aug
eldorado8–8-0.1421%29 Aug
eldorado5–9-0.1214%29 Aug
vertigo9–70.015%29 Aug
poseidon6–9-0.170%29 Aug
overpass8–8-0.165%29 Aug
vertigo9–50.0024%29 Aug
inferno8–80.0524%29 Aug
inferno10–13-0.067%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0610%29 Aug
poseidon3–9-0.1314%29 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0616%29 Aug
vertigo5–9-0.0917%28 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0411%28 Aug
vertigo7–9-0.0415%28 Aug
poseidon9–10.1410%28 Aug
inferno9–30.0713%28 Aug
overpass7–9-0.1710%28 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →