Döaminäita — CS2 Stats

DE76561198161352311[U:1:201086583]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

8,677Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating27,381Top 5% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4158 of 235398 tracked

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 27,381 → 27,381

0Faceit ELO · 2,404 → 2,404

+10Tracked matches · now 8,677

−6.9ppWin rate · 58.6% → 51.7%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 10 days played since 1 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,381 +8,894 1 Sept – 21 Sept · 11 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,404 +0 1 Sept – 21 Sept · 2 observations

28,724Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,404Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

10Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,404
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 96 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

751 below peak (28,132)
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,619 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-09-21
Pink band first seen 2026-09-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84

Positioning64

Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–40–5Last 10055%Win rateWLLWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +5.9pp headshot accuracy · +63ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 26%
Avg reaction 470ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 28%
Avg reaction 477ms

Last 20

8–12 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 446ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.4

Utility2.1

Positioning6.4

Opening Duels4.4

Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4

Positioning6.4

Utility2.1

Mechanics4.1

Opening Duels6.5

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time435ms+13ms

first ⅓ avg 423ms → last ⅓ avg 435ms

Headshot accuracy22.3%−1.6%

first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 13 Sept →

100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–1 · inferno, 18 Sept →

266msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · nuke, 18 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · inferno, 20 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak

14–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 16cacheWeakest map · 20% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	C	27	12–15	44%	0.03
ancient	S	16	12–4	75%	0.02
mirage	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.01
anubis	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.01
nuke	A	12	7–5	58%	0.03
cache	D	10	2–8	20%	-0.01
dust2	S	9	6–3	67%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,170Matches

50%Win rate

1.02Avg K/D

79.4ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	853	53%	1.00	16.2
Dust2	561	49%	0.98	15.5
Inferno	495	53%	1.09	16.7
Anubis	471	48%	1.03	15.8
Mirage	430	44%	0.93	14.9
Nuke	282	48%	0.90	14.4
Vertigo	108	50%	1.04	16.5
Overpass	92	46%	0.92	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy

32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.8%Spray accuracy

68.6%Counter-strafing

6.5°Preaim

425msReaction time

61.5%T opening success

50.4%CT opening success

0.31Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

6.63HE damage / grenade

0.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3092 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–11	0.04	24%	21 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	29%	21 Sept →
inferno	7–13	0.11	31%	21 Sept →
mirage	13–2	-0.06	17%	21 Sept →
cache	3–13	-0.08	30%	21 Sept →
ancient	11–13	-0.06	34%	20 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.01	30%	20 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.01	36%	20 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	39%	20 Sept →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	12%	20 Sept →
ancient	13–1	0.00	22%	20 Sept →
mirage	0–13	-0.06	0%	20 Sept →
ancient	4–13	-0.09	27%	20 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.10	13%	20 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.02	47%	20 Sept →
anubis	6–13	-0.10	15%	20 Sept →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	20%	20 Sept →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	43%	20 Sept →
inferno	13–0	0.03	38%	20 Sept →
mirage	7–1	-0.04	0%	20 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.01	14%	19 Sept →
ancient	15–15	0.04	13%	19 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.07	24%	19 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.01	4%	19 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.11	23%	19 Sept →
cache	10–13	-0.03	22%	19 Sept →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	22%	19 Sept →
inferno	14–16	-0.03	26%	19 Sept →
inferno	13–2	0.06	27%	19 Sept →
inferno	13–0	0.01	0%	19 Sept →
nuke	13–5	0.07	12%	19 Sept →
nuke	16–14	-0.01	19%	19 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.01	24%	19 Sept →
inferno	13–8	0.01	31%	19 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.02	30%	19 Sept →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	32%	18 Sept →
inferno	3–1	-0.01	100%	18 Sept →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	35%	18 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.04	32%	18 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.01	20%	18 Sept →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	29%	18 Sept →
anubis	13–5	-0.01	10%	18 Sept →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	24%	18 Sept →
inferno	15–15	-0.04	25%	18 Sept →
inferno	1–13	0.07	30%	18 Sept →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	50%	18 Sept →
anubis	1–13	-0.03	36%	18 Sept →
nuke	0–13	-0.04	20%	18 Sept →
anubis	13–4	-0.03	25%	17 Sept →
cache	13–10	-0.01	30%	17 Sept →
ancient	13–2	-0.06	30%	17 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.01	50%	17 Sept →
nuke	13–5	0.08	20%	17 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.05	15%	17 Sept →
nuke	13–7	0.08	16%	17 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.09	25%	17 Sept →
cache	7–13	0.03	14%	17 Sept →
nuke	14–16	0.03	15%	17 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.01	22%	17 Sept →
inferno	16–14	0.06	23%	17 Sept →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	15%	17 Sept →
dust2	13–8	0.07	36%	17 Sept →
nuke	13–10	-0.06	27%	17 Sept →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	19%	17 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.01	38%	17 Sept →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	14%	17 Sept →
mirage	16–12	0.04	34%	16 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.04	22%	16 Sept →
mirage	16–14	0.08	24%	16 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.02	18%	16 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.06	36%	16 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.01	18%	16 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.01	20%	16 Sept →
nuke	7–13	0.05	41%	16 Sept →
anubis	2–13	-0.08	19%	16 Sept →
ancient	13–5	0.01	42%	16 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	28%	15 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	13%	15 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.13	22%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–9	0.00	22%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.03	19%	15 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.02	27%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.03	13%	15 Sept →
nuke	11–13	0.02	26%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–2	0.14	40%	15 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.04	21%	15 Sept →
inferno	7–13	0.02	18%	14 Sept →
inferno	15–15	0.12	21%	14 Sept →
inferno	10–13	0.09	21%	14 Sept →
anubis	15–15	0.04	21%	14 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	13%	14 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.00	24%	14 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.03	20%	14 Sept →
anubis	13–10	0.06	13%	13 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	18%	13 Sept →
inferno	13–6	0.11	32%	13 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.07	23%	13 Sept →
cache	15–15	-0.03	18%	13 Sept →
ancient	13–3	0.17	53%	13 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.06	24%	12 Sept →