NemPee

NemPee — CS2 Stats

76561198294016678[U:1:333750950]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,318Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,040Hours in CS49Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating12,179Blue band · top ~43.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13084 of 18527 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNemPeePREMIER12,179 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning53
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46459Last 10046%Win rateWLLWTWLWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8
Aggression6.0
Utility4.9
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.3
Utility4.9
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time571ms−100ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — poseidon 9–1
130Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 58% over 19infernoWeakest map · 19% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2011955%-0.01
dust2A1911858%0.01
infernoD1631319%-0.03
nukeA127558%0.02
cacheA95456%0.01
ancientB84450%0.03
anubisD51420%-0.04
train41325%0.01
vertigo3030%0.09
office220100%0.08
poseidon110100%0.23
fachwerk1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

112,291Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
5,353Matches
34.3%Match win rate
42.8%Headshot %
16.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
9,883MVPs
2,172Hours (in match)
3,976Bombs planted
1,087Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,391
AWP8,215
MP95,418
MAC-104,392
FAMAS3,061

Lifetime map wins

5,643dust2
4,886inferno
1,823nuke
1,074vertigo
999train
447office
150cbble
96lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

186Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
74.2ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

14%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke850%0.9215.1
Dust2650%1.0917.2
Mirage650%1.3115.5
Cache540%1.0518.0
Inferno450%0.619.8
Ancient450%0.9314.8
Anubis10%0.331.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
66.0%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
582msReaction time
28.4%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
9.37HE damage / grenade
5.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4589 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.3566% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

19% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0922%27 Aug
train4–130.0518%27 Aug
dust211–130.0520%27 Aug
nuke9–20.1241%26 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0526%26 Aug
inferno9–20.1621%26 Aug
mirage1–6-0.0420%26 Aug
cache13–30.0929%26 Aug
cache12–120.0216%26 Aug
dust213–60.0516%25 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0215%25 Aug
mirage7–130.0114%25 Aug
cache13–30.0112%23 Aug
ancient6–13-0.069%23 Aug
ancient13–40.1222%23 Aug
dust29–130.0126%23 Aug
nuke3–130.0123%23 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0018%18 Aug
mirage13–20.0424%18 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0811%17 Aug
mirage13–80.0322%17 Aug
dust25–130.0326%16 Aug
dust213–80.0628%16 Aug
inferno9–5-0.0818%15 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0723%15 Aug
inferno7–130.0334%14 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0326%14 Aug
dust213–50.0120%14 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0326%14 Aug
cache8–10.0516%14 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0616%13 Aug
train5–13-0.0913%13 Aug
ancient13–80.0737%13 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0212%13 Aug
train11–40.0519%13 Aug
train5–130.0320%13 Aug
dust213–90.0122%11 Aug
nuke13–60.1122%10 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0213%9 Aug
dust216–130.0725%9 Aug
nuke13–90.0628%8 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0019%8 Aug
dust25–130.0114%8 Aug
dust213–4-0.0721%7 Aug
cache13–5-0.0135%7 Aug
mirage13–100.0430%7 Aug
mirage15–150.0017%7 Aug
mirage1–130.0119%7 Aug
anubis13–90.0421%6 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0022%6 Aug
mirage13–30.0523%6 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0413%6 Aug
inferno13–60.0316%6 Aug
dust213–110.0020%6 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0620%5 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0322%4 Aug
mirage13–50.0113%4 Aug
dust25–13-0.0939%4 Aug
mirage9–0-0.0219%4 Aug
nuke9–4-0.0420%4 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0717%4 Aug
dust211–130.0015%4 Aug
office13–40.0527%4 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0316%4 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0018%3 Aug
dust213–2-0.0314%3 Aug
office13–110.1122%2 Aug
dust212–12-0.0221%2 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0527%2 Aug
vertigo8–130.0429%1 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0635%1 Aug
cache7–13-0.0619%1 Aug
vertigo6–130.0919%1 Aug
ancient9–130.0227%1 Aug
inferno8–8-0.1321%1 Aug
poseidon9–10.2315%1 Aug
vertigo5–120.1332%29 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0313%28 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0911%27 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0316%27 Jul
cache6–13-0.0627%26 Jul
cache13–00.1423%26 Jul
inferno6–9-0.1411%26 Jul
cache2–13-0.058%26 Jul
dust213–70.0126%26 Jul
nuke13–90.0116%26 Jul
fachwerk12–12-0.0126%25 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0215%24 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0416%24 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0524%24 Jul
ancient11–130.0422%24 Jul
dust213–30.0716%24 Jul
dust213–10-0.0510%24 Jul
mirage13–90.0414%24 Jul
mirage9–20.018%24 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0424%23 Jul
nuke15–150.0121%23 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0819%23 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0215%22 Jul
dust29–130.0014%22 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →