hmm?

hmm? — CS2 Stats

76561198293091276[U:1:332825548]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,694Tracked matches64%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,823Hours in CS36Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,870), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate58.3%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy4.7%12.7%13.0%8.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.191.051.06above
Match win rate52.7%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhmm?FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning66
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–46–8Last 10046%Win rateTWLLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −3.3pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.05), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.11
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility5.1
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch5.6

Sharp aimerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 72% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.92 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 72% on T to 52% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.6
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels7.8
Win Impact9.8

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time570ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy27.7%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 29.2% → last ⅓ avg 27.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–13 · inferno, 30 Sept →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 13 Sept →
438msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · nuke, 1 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 24 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
2–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5cacheWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2613–1350%0.00
vertigoC188–1044%0.01
cacheC145–936%-0.00
trainA95–456%-0.02
mirageC83–538%0.04
infernoA74–357%0.04
anubisS64–267%0.04
dust2S54–180%0.04
office—40–40%0.00
overpass—20–20%-0.01
ancient—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

53,227Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
3,013Matches
52.7%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players
58.3%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 7 players
4.7%Shot accuracy
8,069MVPs
1,040Hours (in match)
2,762Bombs planted
719Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,574dust2
5,773nuke
2,928inferno
2,200vertigo
1,146train
291lake
187office
86cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

56Matches
57%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
88.5ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1182%1.5217.0
Ancient967%1.6119.2
Anubis825%1.1516.8
Dust2729%1.0214.9
Nuke667%1.3820.3
Cache560%1.3918.2
Inferno580%1.3413.8
Overpass1100%1.6418.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.3%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
567msReaction time
72.4%T opening success
52.4%CT opening success
0.92Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
5.14HE damage / grenade
4.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–120.1319%1 Oct →
cache13–70.0824%1 Oct →
nuke9–130.0318%1 Oct →
inferno9–130.1931%30 Sept →
dust213–100.1018%30 Sept →
nuke6–130.0323%30 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0229%30 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.136%28 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0045%28 Sept →
anubis13–40.1041%28 Sept →
nuke13–60.0531%28 Sept →
dust213–100.0225%28 Sept →
train13–10-0.0034%28 Sept →
vertigo13–9-0.0240%27 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0223%27 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0035%27 Sept →
nuke13–90.0120%27 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0719%25 Sept →
vertigo13–10.0937%24 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0324%23 Sept →
nuke13–90.1227%23 Sept →
office5–13-0.0535%22 Sept →
nuke13–80.1131%22 Sept →
anubis13–20.1030%22 Sept →
nuke13–30.0931%22 Sept →
train10–00.0844%22 Sept →
mirage13–60.0118%22 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0526%21 Sept →
dust213–80.0326%21 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0427%21 Sept →
vertigo7–13-0.0122%21 Sept →
anubis13–110.0023%21 Sept →
cache6–90.0235%21 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0438%18 Sept →
train8–13-0.0721%18 Sept →
vertigo2–13-0.1127%18 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0526%17 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0731%16 Sept →
office12–120.0228%16 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0731%16 Sept →
nuke6–130.0222%16 Sept →
train13–10-0.0719%16 Sept →
nuke9–130.0532%14 Sept →
inferno13–70.0123%14 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0617%14 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0025%13 Sept →
inferno12–120.0124%13 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0221%13 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0556%13 Sept →
vertigo9–130.0040%13 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0431%13 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0534%13 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0929%13 Sept →
cache9–130.0245%13 Sept →
train10–13-0.0423%13 Sept →
cache13–110.0421%12 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0711%12 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0812%12 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0327%11 Sept →
train13–100.0947%11 Sept →
overpass9–13-0.0522%11 Sept →
cache13–90.0230%11 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0627%10 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0425%10 Sept →
office2–130.0243%10 Sept →
mirage13–80.0229%10 Sept →
nuke13–70.0134%10 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0132%10 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0331%9 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0724%9 Sept →
anubis2–100.0927%9 Sept →
train11–13-0.0418%9 Sept →
cache11–130.0235%9 Sept →
train6–1-0.0125%9 Sept →
vertigo13–10.0620%9 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0533%8 Sept →
overpass6–130.0318%8 Sept →
nuke13–30.0041%8 Sept →
train8–13-0.0932%8 Sept →
vertigo13–20.1841%8 Sept →
mirage6–130.0420%8 Sept →
anubis13–50.0338%8 Sept →
dust27–130.0143%7 Sept →
office9–130.0025%7 Sept →
inferno13–90.0128%7 Sept →
cache11–130.0342%7 Sept →
mirage13–50.0249%7 Sept →
nuke7–130.0724%7 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0917%6 Sept →
cache3–9-0.0233%6 Sept →
nuke13–90.0224%6 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0218%6 Sept →
inferno13–40.1446%6 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0318%4 Sept →
mirage6–130.0317%4 Sept →
dust213–50.0236%4 Sept →
mirage11–130.1330%2 Sept →
nuke10–130.0126%2 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0029%30 Aug →
vertigo13–10.0525%30 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.