frog ♡

frog ♡ — CS2 Stats

US76561198289926096[U:1:329660368]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,423Tracked matches34%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,355Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating18,012Purple band · top ~16.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,423 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 27 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,012 -3,918 28 Dec20 Sept · 18 days played
17,58921,930peak 21,93028 Dec20 Sept
22,263Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2025-12-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,918 below peak (21,930)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,988 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate56.5%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy10.7%11.3%12.0%1.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.040.991.02above
Match win rate44.7%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfrog ♡FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,012 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning54
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD37612Last 10037%Win rateLLTLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.7 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility3.1
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch10.0

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.4
Utility3.1
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time608ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy25.3%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 16–14 · nuke, 30 Aug
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–16 · ancient, 21 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 14 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
617In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8dust2Weakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2381535%-0.01
mirageD2261627%-0.02
infernoB2091145%-0.02
dust2D112918%-0.02
cacheS86275%-0.04
trainD62433%-0.01
anubis41325%-0.04
ancient21150%-0.04
overpass21150%0.02
alpine1010%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

43,649Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
2,275Matches
44.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
56.5%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players
10.7%Shot accuracy
5,485MVPs
861Hours (in match)
2,266Bombs planted
647Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,986nuke
3,047inferno
1,745train
1,284dust2
780vertigo
220office
92cbble
92lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
60%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
63.4ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
100%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.9%Headshot accuracy
28.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
607msReaction time
26.0%T opening success
48.7%CT opening success
0.26Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
8.83HE damage / grenade
1.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2619 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.0305% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–13-0.1020%9 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0133%9 Sept
nuke12–120.0615%8 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0232%6 Sept
dust211–13-0.0224%6 Sept
dust27–13-0.0615%4 Sept
nuke8–130.0520%3 Sept
mirage13–110.0522%3 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0432%1 Sept
nuke13–1-0.0128%1 Sept
train13–4-0.0240%1 Sept
nuke6–13-0.069%1 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0121%31 Aug
cache9–13-0.0128%31 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0323%30 Aug
nuke16–140.0731%30 Aug
dust213–11-0.0223%30 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0219%30 Aug
cache13–8-0.0422%30 Aug
inferno13–80.0221%30 Aug
nuke2–7-0.0442%30 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0120%27 Aug
dust213–80.0222%26 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0623%25 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0827%24 Aug
mirage7–13-0.1023%24 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0224%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0520%22 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0435%22 Aug
cache13–11-0.0417%22 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0745%21 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0130%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0128%20 Aug
inferno13–100.0420%15 Aug
cache13–7-0.0123%15 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0519%15 Aug
dust26–130.0422%14 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0124%14 Aug
mirage0–13-0.1333%14 Aug
nuke13–8-0.029%14 Aug
inferno13–100.0220%14 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0531%8 Aug
cache13–60.0321%8 Aug
cache13–10-0.109%3 May
cache13–10-0.0631%3 May
mirage9–130.0522%4 Apr
alpine9–13-0.0225%23 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0131%17 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0020%17 Feb
inferno13–80.0220%17 Feb
inferno13–16-0.0429%17 Feb
train8–13-0.0227%14 Feb
dust23–13-0.0617%14 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0526%14 Feb
inferno16–130.0427%13 Feb
vertigo13–90.0122%12 Feb
dust23–13-0.0434%12 Feb
mirage11–130.0425%12 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0424%12 Feb
nuke6–130.0327%12 Feb
mirage13–16-0.0512%31 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0023%31 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0323%24 Jan
mirage11–130.0523%24 Jan
anubis13–6-0.0826%23 Jan
inferno11–13-0.076%23 Jan
nuke13–110.0223%23 Jan
nuke11–13-0.0127%21 Jan
train10–130.0127%16 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0534%16 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0812%16 Jan
nuke11–13-0.0528%15 Jan
train4–13-0.0430%15 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0221%12 Jan
dust28–130.0628%11 Jan
inferno3–13-0.0021%10 Jan
dust212–16-0.0525%9 Jan
train11–13-0.0433%9 Jan
inferno9–130.0127%9 Jan
inferno15–15-0.0425%9 Jan
mirage16–13-0.0122%8 Jan
dust23–13-0.0512%8 Jan
mirage14–16-0.0423%8 Jan
train16–140.0528%8 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0024%8 Jan
nuke13–30.0730%8 Jan
overpass7–130.0528%8 Jan
nuke7–130.0225%8 Jan
inferno14–16-0.0619%8 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0713%7 Jan
overpass13–3-0.0212%4 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0113%4 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0121%3 Jan
mirage16–12-0.0614%31 Dec
mirage1–13-0.0631%31 Dec
nuke13–16-0.0131%30 Dec
inferno13–80.0026%30 Dec
inferno13–9-0.0811%28 Dec
inferno13–9-0.0516%28 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0526%27 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →