penniS

penniS — CS2 Stats

FI76561198288933501[U:1:328667773]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,578Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,570Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#90154 of 234110 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,488 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 21 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,993 -1,659 21 Feb25 Jun · 26 days played
17,96520,652peak 20,65221 Feb25 Jun
20,652Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,488Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-02-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,488
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 43 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.2%46.8%48.3%2.1% short
Shot accuracy11.2%13.0%13.2%2.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.061.070.08 short
Match win rate44.1%46.3%46.9%2.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpenniSFACEITLevel 8 · 1,488 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,488csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning46
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50437Last 10050%Win rateWLLLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · −40ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility6.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.6
Utility6.1
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time591ms−108ms
first ⅓ avg 699ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–6 · nuke, 7 Apr
42%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 10 Jun
414msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 12 Mar
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 24 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 14ancientWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA31171455%0.01
infernoC156940%-0.02
mirageS1410471%-0.02
cacheA116555%-0.03
ancientD102820%-0.01
anubisB84450%0.01
dust2A85363%-0.02
overpass2020%-0.05
vertigo1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

128,696Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
7,726Matches
44.1%Match win rate
46.2%Headshot %
11.2%Shot accuracy
16,742MVPs
2,570Hours (in match)
8,615Bombs planted
1,681Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,897
AWP16,456
SSG 085,802
Tec-94,435
Knife4,244
FAMAS3,945

Lifetime map wins

15,545nuke
10,472inferno
5,022dust2
2,107vertigo
2,079train
759office
727lake
517cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

884Matches
50%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
76.0ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke16360%0.9414.4
Anubis15251%0.8513.9
Mirage14143%0.8413.8
Inferno14049%0.8813.6
Dust28848%0.7912.9
Ancient8143%0.8613.9
Vertigo5443%0.7812.2
Overpass4060%0.8714.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.4%Headshot accuracy
27.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.8%Spray accuracy
72.0%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
581msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
26.8%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
9.84HE damage / grenade
11.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.7952% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–40.0121%30 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0441%30 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0029%27 Aug
nuke15–19-0.0323%24 Aug
cache13–30.0018%24 Aug
anubis13–50.0825%24 Aug
nuke13–80.0639%24 Aug
cache4–130.0328%24 Aug
cache5–13-0.0724%20 Aug
cache13–8-0.0429%19 Aug
ancient9–130.0128%18 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0332%18 Aug
anubis11–130.0111%17 Aug
cache13–70.0122%17 Aug
inferno13–80.0127%17 Aug
cache13–11-0.0023%17 Aug
ancient13–60.0518%17 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0430%17 Aug
nuke9–4-0.0211%17 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0325%17 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0227%17 Aug
cache9–13-0.0719%1 Aug
nuke9–4-0.0313%1 Aug
nuke8–8-0.0917%21 Jul
inferno13–70.0137%21 Jul
mirage4–130.0524%21 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0624%21 Jul
nuke9–6-0.0313%15 Jul
cache5–13-0.0725%15 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0033%25 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0332%22 Jun
inferno8–130.0023%21 Jun
dust213–11-0.0725%18 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0642%10 Jun
nuke13–40.0717%10 Jun
cache13–10-0.0311%26 May
ancient8–13-0.0139%26 May
nuke13–50.0431%24 May
nuke13–11-0.0416%13 May
dust213–20.0521%13 May
anubis13–6-0.0125%12 May
inferno6–13-0.0732%10 May
cache3–13-0.0824%10 May
mirage13–10-0.0912%4 May
nuke13–4-0.0032%4 May
nuke9–40.0930%28 Apr
nuke8–80.0431%28 Apr
inferno15–150.0230%28 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0522%27 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0623%22 Apr
nuke6–90.0121%11 Apr
nuke9–6-0.0324%9 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0030%7 Apr
nuke9–60.1317%7 Apr
mirage13–80.0122%2 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0125%2 Apr
inferno16–130.0224%26 Mar
nuke9–130.0319%24 Mar
nuke13–100.0214%24 Mar
inferno13–5-0.124%15 Mar
mirage15–150.0125%14 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0935%12 Mar
inferno10–13-0.068%12 Mar
ancient13–70.0420%12 Mar
anubis13–80.0024%11 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0815%6 Mar
nuke13–50.0218%5 Mar
dust213–2-0.0224%5 Mar
nuke9–60.0128%5 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0620%3 Mar
nuke13–60.0325%3 Mar
ancient12–16-0.0022%3 Mar
dust211–13-0.0219%3 Mar
dust215–15-0.0528%3 Mar
nuke7–90.0220%3 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0531%3 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0634%3 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0434%3 Mar
mirage13–60.0326%3 Mar
nuke9–5-0.0035%3 Mar
mirage11–130.0429%2 Mar
anubis13–100.1024%2 Mar
nuke15–15-0.0126%2 Mar
dust213–100.0123%2 Mar
mirage13–60.0139%2 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0631%2 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0029%2 Mar
dust26–13-0.0128%2 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0715%28 Feb
inferno16–13-0.0414%24 Feb
dust213–11-0.0526%24 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0330%24 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0225%24 Feb
nuke13–00.1134%24 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0420%24 Feb
inferno5–130.0415%23 Feb
overpass10–13-0.0430%23 Feb
ancient11–130.0220%22 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0721%22 Feb
ancient11–130.0016%21 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →