deamon

deamon — CS2 Stats

US76561198288729773[U:1:328464045]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,011Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,360Hours in CS42Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating1,597Grey band · top ~93.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 1 · 430 ELOTop 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 24 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 1,597 -1,040 24 Jun17 Sept · 12 days played
1,4052,700peak 2,70024 Jun17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 430 +0 31 Aug9 Sept · 3 observations
430430peak 43031 Aug9 Sept
2,700Peak Premier in tracked matches
430Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-06-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 430
  • Next: Level 2 at 501 71 to go

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,103 below peak (2,700)
  • -96 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,040 over 90 days
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 3,403 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2627−1
Win rate38%37%+1pp
K/D0.830.89−0.05
Headshot %51%53%−1pp

Measured 11 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,911), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate56.1%41.0%41.3%above
Shot accuracy8.2%14.1%12.6%4.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.030.950.96above
Match win rate35.2%42.2%42.5%7.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdeamonFACEITLevel 1 · 430 ELOSTANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER1,597 · Grey bandPEAK ELO430csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning48
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD29629Last 10029%Win rateLLLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · +66ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 684ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim4.4
Utility2.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.0

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 23% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning4.8
Utility2.9
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time668ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 702ms → last ⅓ avg 668ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 10 Sept
30%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · dust2, 25 Aug
336msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · dust2, 23 Jul
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 2 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L5Current streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 47% over 15dust2Weakest map · 20% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2041620%-0.03
mirageD1851328%-0.03
ancientB157847%-0.03
cacheD1441029%-0.03
nukeD103730%0.02
anubisD93633%-0.04
infernoC52340%-0.03
vertigo4040%-0.02
fachwerk21150%-0.02
overpass1010%0.02
office1010%-0.03
train1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,832Lifetime kills
1.03K/D · Top 50% of Level 1 players
4,472Matches
35.2%Match win rate
56.1%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 1 players
8.2%Shot accuracy
6,314MVPs
1,752Hours (in match)
4,023Bombs planted
1,104Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,303dust2
3,940inferno
2,848nuke
2,356vertigo
890train
205cbble
71office
38lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

400Matches
44%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
61.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14745%0.8211.3
Ancient6151%0.8212.6
Inferno4048%0.7711.8
Vertigo3355%0.9914.7
Dust23139%0.7411.4
Nuke2631%0.8011.5
Anubis2343%0.8511.9
Cache1030%0.8012.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.7%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
12.3°Preaim
657msReaction time
64.3%T opening success
22.6%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
9.79HE damage / grenade
3.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2539° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4713 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.0515%17 Sept
cache1–13-0.0627%17 Sept
dust26–13-0.064%17 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0615%16 Sept
anubis0–13-0.0912%16 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0629%16 Sept
cache13–80.0321%15 Sept
cache7–13-0.0120%15 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0329%14 Sept
nuke13–110.0725%10 Sept
ancient13–20.1417%10 Sept
dust213–90.0015%10 Sept
dust210–130.0119%9 Sept
mirage7–13-0.1127%9 Sept
mirage13–60.119%8 Sept
dust213–8-0.0214%8 Sept
nuke13–80.0628%8 Sept
dust28–13-0.0022%8 Sept
dust25–13-0.0327%7 Sept
cache6–13-0.074%7 Sept
dust26–130.0319%2 Sept
nuke13–10.0917%2 Sept
cache1–13-0.105%25 Aug
ancient12–12-0.028%25 Aug
dust28–13-0.0430%25 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0412%25 Aug
ancient13–90.0417%24 Aug
mirage12–16-0.036%21 Aug
dust210–130.0120%19 Aug
inferno13–50.0115%9 Aug
overpass6–130.0210%4 Aug
vertigo9–130.0020%4 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0526%4 Aug
cache15–150.0016%3 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0325%3 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0110%2 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0614%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0514%2 Aug
nuke11–130.0424%2 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0814%2 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0215%1 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0010%1 Aug
cache14–16-0.059%1 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0214%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.0216%1 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0429%1 Aug
fachwerk4–13-0.096%1 Aug
cache4–13-0.095%1 Aug
cache8–00.0113%1 Aug
inferno9–13-0.016%31 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.018%31 Jul
vertigo12–120.0223%31 Jul
cache9–10.0619%31 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0714%31 Jul
dust23–13-0.0515%28 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0414%28 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0620%28 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0828%27 Jul
mirage13–60.0014%27 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0427%27 Jul
cache13–5-0.0215%26 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0114%25 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0624%25 Jul
nuke9–13-0.059%24 Jul
cache6–13-0.0619%24 Jul
dust213–8-0.117%23 Jul
dust20–13-0.080%23 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0817%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0413%21 Jul
ancient10–13-0.028%20 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0518%18 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0126%18 Jul
vertigo12–12-0.118%18 Jul
anubis13–70.0111%18 Jul
cache9–13-0.0521%18 Jul
dust28–13-0.0724%18 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0212%18 Jul
dust213–10-0.0311%18 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0912%17 Jul
ancient4–13-0.1019%17 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0129%14 Jul
dust27–13-0.0716%11 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0311%11 Jul
cache4–13-0.0613%11 Jul
dust29–13-0.0023%11 Jul
dust26–130.0711%11 Jul
nuke4–130.087%10 Jul
office9–13-0.038%10 Jul
mirage15–15-0.045%9 Jul
fachwerk5–30.0512%9 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0519%9 Jul
train8–130.0615%8 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0113%8 Jul
inferno6–13-0.110%6 Jul
dust24–13-0.0521%28 Jun
anubis1–13-0.0617%28 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0414%25 Jun
nuke14–160.0312%25 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0217%25 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0210%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →