g0ku

g0ku — CS2 Stats

IN76561198286887428[U:1:326621700]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,840Tracked matches79%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,573Hours in CS25Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,100Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18734 of 227434 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 5 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,100 -758 12 Jul11 Sept · 15 days played
24,66826,191peak 26,19112 Jul11 Sept
26,264Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-07-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,091 below peak (26,191)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,900 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate39.7%46.8%48.3%8.6% short
Shot accuracy11.6%13.0%13.2%1.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.151.061.07above
Match win rate51.1%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGg0kuFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,100 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning47
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT66277Last 10066%Win rateLWWWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 1631 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.5 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility7.5
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.7
Utility7.5
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time639ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 699ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 11 Jul
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · anubis, 11 Jul
500msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 15 Jul
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 11 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 46% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2113862%0.04
dust2S2015575%0.03
mirageA1610663%0.01
cacheS139469%0.02
anubisB136746%0.01
ancientS108280%0.00
nuke330100%0.05
overpass21150%0.04
train110100%0.02
vertigo1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

233,398Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9,118Matches
51.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
39.7%Headshot %
11.6%Shot accuracy
26,482MVPs
4,219Hours (in match)
8,335Bombs planted
4,979Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4784,145
AWP41,037
MP92,720
MAC-102,582
Tec-92,516

Lifetime map wins

20,907inferno
16,279dust2
10,199nuke
9,266vertigo
3,686train
80aztec
15italy
12ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

455Matches
50%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
79.1ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6144%1.2116.0
Inferno5758%1.3617.6
Anubis5145%1.2716.6
Ancient4161%1.3016.7
Dust22352%1.0514.1
Vertigo2167%1.3518.6
Nuke1338%1.4817.7
Overpass617%1.2017.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
635msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
12.5%Flash assists
14.92HE damage / grenade
8.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0066% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0327%12 Sept
mirage13–30.0720%12 Sept
inferno13–90.1021%12 Sept
cache13–90.0213%12 Sept
mirage13–90.077%12 Sept
cache13–90.0116%11 Sept
inferno13–80.0616%11 Sept
ancient13–60.0521%9 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0518%9 Sept
dust213–60.0121%8 Sept
cache13–60.1127%6 Sept
dust28–13-0.0217%6 Sept
ancient7–60.026%5 Sept
cache13–10.0536%5 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0118%5 Sept
dust213–110.0722%5 Sept
anubis13–50.0718%5 Sept
mirage13–90.0539%5 Sept
inferno12–120.0611%5 Sept
cache13–110.019%31 Aug
inferno13–40.0724%31 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0116%31 Aug
dust213–30.1028%30 Aug
cache13–110.0118%30 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0019%29 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0016%29 Aug
mirage6–13-0.048%29 Aug
cache7–130.0328%27 Aug
anubis13–40.0328%24 Aug
dust213–10.1226%24 Aug
overpass12–120.0331%24 Aug
train13–110.0217%19 Aug
mirage13–70.0428%19 Aug
dust213–20.1218%11 Aug
anubis13–00.0618%11 Aug
inferno13–60.122%5 Aug
nuke13–50.1225%4 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0827%4 Aug
mirage13–00.000%4 Aug
nuke13–40.0819%31 Jul
anubis13–90.0513%31 Jul
dust213–90.0519%31 Jul
mirage5–130.0120%31 Jul
dust213–100.0425%31 Jul
vertigo12–120.0316%30 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0113%30 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0015%29 Jul
dust211–130.0211%29 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0715%27 Jul
overpass13–50.0610%27 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0315%27 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0023%27 Jul
anubis13–50.0416%27 Jul
mirage12–120.0013%26 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0715%26 Jul
dust213–40.1318%26 Jul
inferno13–60.0316%25 Jul
dust213–40.0922%23 Jul
dust22–13-0.0211%22 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0114%22 Jul
ancient13–80.0118%22 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0214%22 Jul
anubis13–20.0422%22 Jul
dust213–110.0117%22 Jul
inferno7–20.1320%19 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0213%19 Jul
anubis0–13-0.0714%19 Jul
inferno4–130.0228%19 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0514%19 Jul
inferno13–80.0214%18 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0310%18 Jul
ancient13–100.0318%18 Jul
inferno13–60.1423%18 Jul
dust213–70.0420%18 Jul
anubis11–13-0.008%16 Jul
ancient13–50.0316%15 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0611%13 Jul
cache5–13-0.0122%13 Jul
dust213–10-0.0117%12 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0710%12 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0711%12 Jul
cache13–100.0219%12 Jul
dust213–80.0224%12 Jul
anubis0–13-0.02100%11 Jul
inferno0–13-0.0167%11 Jul
dust20–13-0.0710%11 Jul
inferno13–80.0316%11 Jul
ancient13–70.028%11 Jul
cache5–13-0.076%11 Jul
inferno13–20.1837%11 Jul
inferno3–130.0511%10 Jul
dust213–110.0116%10 Jul
cache4–13-0.0310%10 Jul
mirage13–90.0512%10 Jul
inferno11–130.0020%9 Jul
ancient13–60.024%9 Jul
cache13–40.0428%9 Jul
dust213–90.0115%5 Jul
mirage13–50.1121%5 Jul
cache13–110.0232%5 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →