ED

ED — CS2 Stats

US76561198285687983[U:1:325422255]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

283Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
163Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,898 +3,419 29 Feb – 27 May · 5 days played
5,4799,021peak 9,02129 Feb27 May
9,021Peak Premier in tracked matches
46Days played since 2023-12-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning39
Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–46–8Last 10046%Win rateLLWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −9.5pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 724ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 694ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 692ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility1.4
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels1.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 13% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 658ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning3.9
Utility1.4
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time660ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 660ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 11.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · office, 29 Jan →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · office, 5 Apr →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · office, 29 Mar →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 9 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeC2410–1442%-0.02
infernoC198–1142%-0.04
nukeA127–558%-0.01
dust2D102–820%-0.03
overpassA95–456%-0.01
vertigoB84–450%-0.04
mirageS75–271%0.02
ancientA53–260%-0.04
anubis—42–250%-0.01
basalt—10–10%0.02
train—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

7,318Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
510Matches
45.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
32.5%Headshot %
14.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
798MVPs
163Hours (in match)
330Bombs planted
62Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

748dust2
693office
674nuke
642inferno
198vertigo
53train
9cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
658msReaction time
13.5%T opening success
34.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
11.62HE damage / grenade
4.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.1042° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.4852% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–11-0.0319%13 Nov →
overpass5–13-0.0425%4 Nov →
dust213–90.0613%13 Oct →
dust23–30.0120%20 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0215%20 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0411%20 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0811%7 Dec →
basalt6–130.024%17 Nov →
train2–130.048%17 Nov →
office10–13-0.0318%15 Aug →
vertigo14–16-0.0219%27 May →
dust216–14-0.0218%17 May →
nuke13–8-0.0811%17 May →
office13–8-0.0916%14 May →
office5–13-0.06100%5 Apr →
office12–120.0122%4 Apr →
office13–5-0.0011%2 Apr →
office13–30.0428%29 Mar →
overpass13–10-0.075%2 Mar →
mirage13–110.0110%2 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0313%2 Mar →
overpass13–40.039%2 Mar →
inferno13–6-0.0511%1 Mar →
vertigo13–9-0.0612%1 Mar →
nuke13–110.029%1 Mar →
office5–130.0012%1 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0410%1 Mar →
vertigo13–7-0.019%1 Mar →
vertigo13–6-0.033%1 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.063%29 Feb →
office13–10.0619%29 Feb →
nuke16–14-0.027%29 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.0212%29 Feb →
nuke13–110.1313%29 Feb →
ancient13–10-0.0112%29 Feb →
mirage13–20.099%29 Feb →
anubis13–80.067%20 Feb →
overpass10–30.114%20 Feb →
nuke11–130.0110%20 Feb →
vertigo14–160.037%19 Feb →
inferno6–130.0410%19 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0011%19 Feb →
vertigo5–13-0.1012%19 Feb →
office12–120.0312%19 Feb →
nuke13–10-0.0118%19 Feb →
vertigo8–13-0.090%17 Feb →
inferno13–80.0211%17 Feb →
office13–4-0.0120%17 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.1117%17 Feb →
inferno3–13-0.124%16 Feb →
office7–13-0.0921%15 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.0315%14 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.098%14 Feb →
inferno13–50.0125%14 Feb →
mirage13–90.037%8 Feb →
office3–13-0.0914%2 Feb →
office13–8-0.0713%2 Feb →
ancient15–15-0.019%1 Feb →
dust210–13-0.0522%1 Feb →
office13–10.1335%29 Jan →
overpass12–12-0.0615%29 Jan →
office13–10-0.062%28 Jan →
inferno8–13-0.063%28 Jan →
nuke1–13-0.063%28 Jan →
nuke13–5-0.0311%28 Jan →
inferno2–5-0.0811%20 Jan →
inferno9–13-0.0611%15 Jan →
overpass15–15-0.0313%15 Jan →
vertigo16–14-0.049%15 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.027%14 Jan →
dust25–13-0.0217%14 Jan →
overpass13–11-0.032%14 Jan →
nuke13–30.0615%9 Jan →
mirage13–00.0425%9 Jan →
nuke3–13-0.0619%9 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.0312%8 Jan →
inferno10–13-0.084%5 Jan →
office12–12-0.0312%4 Jan →
ancient13–9-0.096%2 Jan →
inferno9–13-0.0214%2 Jan →
office9–13-0.0111%2 Jan →
dust211–13-0.095%24 Dec →
office1–13-0.1012%24 Dec →
office4–13-0.1417%23 Dec →
office8–130.0415%20 Dec →
anubis10–13-0.0820%20 Dec →
dust210–13-0.048%20 Dec →
dust25–13-0.1015%18 Dec →
inferno7–20.053%18 Dec →
office11–13-0.079%17 Dec →
office13–70.0218%16 Dec →
inferno10–6-0.0812%16 Dec →
inferno13–10-0.0214%15 Dec →
office12–120.136%13 Dec →
inferno12–12-0.140%12 Dec →
inferno13–11-0.0312%4 Dec →
overpass13–10.0213%4 Dec →
anubis13–00.085%4 Dec →
mirage4–20.0217%4 Dec →
office13–30.0113%4 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.