DrWong Doctor of Trains

DrWong Doctor of Trains — CS2 Stats

76561198283203629[U:1:322937901]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,832Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,912Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,588 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,832 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 22 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,588 +0 6 Sept15 Sept · 2 observations
1,5881,588peak 1,5886 Sept15 Sept
1,588Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-02-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,588
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 163 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,302), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate43.4%45.7%46.8%3.4% short
Shot accuracy11.1%12.7%13.0%1.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.821.051.060.24 short
Match win rate38.3%45.7%46.3%8.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDrWong Doctor of TrainsFACEITLevel 7 · 1,588 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,588csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning43
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4654Last 10046%Win rateLWLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −62ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.1
Utility4.2
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.3
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time635ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–10 · dust2, 10 Mar
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · inferno, 12 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · cache, 30 Apr
13–0Biggest win · cache, 30 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
413In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 21anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC24101442%-0.02
cacheB22101245%-0.01
mirageA2113862%-0.01
nukeA106460%-0.02
ancientC94544%-0.02
anubisD51420%-0.03
dust2C52340%-0.00
overpass3030%-0.06
eldorado1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

58,975Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
2,843Matches
38.3%Match win rate
43.4%Headshot %
11.1%Shot accuracy
4,345MVPs
2,251Hours (in match)
2,135Bombs planted
526Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,370
AWP6,170
FAMAS1,682
Knife1,640
MAC-101,325

Lifetime map wins

6,054inferno
2,787dust2
2,230nuke
1,483train
1,265vertigo
35office
12italy
10safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,626Matches
49%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
71.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage29949%0.9014.0
Inferno25351%0.9214.7
Anubis13752%0.9715.1
Dust210142%0.8713.8
Ancient9046%0.8613.9
Nuke6452%0.8913.6
Train5153%0.9014.0
Vertigo5058%1.1016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
629msReaction time
26.5%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
4.70HE damage / grenade
6.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4354 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.5034% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis12–16-0.0016%5 Sept
nuke13–60.0132%4 Sept
cache16–19-0.0417%22 Aug
nuke13–40.0317%22 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0627%22 Aug
ancient13–60.0213%21 Aug
mirage13–100.0022%15 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0816%16 Jul
cache10–13-0.0617%16 Jul
mirage13–70.0618%16 Jul
cache11–130.0015%16 Jul
cache17–190.0018%16 Jul
inferno23–25-0.0012%15 Jul
cache7–13-0.0526%15 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0527%12 Jul
inferno4–9-0.0250%12 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0117%12 Jul
mirage11–130.0016%12 Jul
inferno13–8-0.027%12 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0911%12 Jul
eldorado5–90.0127%12 Jul
cache13–8-0.0024%8 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0926%7 Jul
anubis13–6-0.064%7 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0513%7 Jul
nuke13–30.1024%7 Jul
inferno25–210.0111%7 Jul
cache10–13-0.0226%5 Jul
anubis10–13-0.019%5 Jul
cache17–19-0.0216%4 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0118%3 Jul
inferno7–13-0.009%28 Jun
ancient9–13-0.027%28 Jun
ancient13–20.0211%28 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0511%26 Jun
anubis8–130.0211%25 Jun
cache13–7-0.0216%25 Jun
cache13–80.0516%25 Jun
inferno13–100.0217%25 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0810%25 Jun
cache11–130.0719%24 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0111%24 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0127%24 Jun
mirage13–90.0410%24 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0414%24 Jun
cache0–13-0.1050%24 Jun
overpass12–16-0.109%23 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0823%23 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0119%23 Jun
cache13–90.0119%23 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0316%22 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0224%22 Jun
mirage13–60.0124%22 Jun
cache13–110.0122%8 Jun
cache13–100.0133%8 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0425%8 Jun
cache7–13-0.0221%8 Jun
inferno22–20-0.0313%7 May
cache14–16-0.089%7 May
inferno7–13-0.0320%7 May
cache13–2-0.0728%30 Apr
cache13–2-0.0011%30 Apr
cache13–10.047%30 Apr
cache13–0-0.020%30 Apr
cache9–13-0.0236%30 Apr
ancient10–130.0219%28 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0217%14 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0222%11 Apr
mirage13–70.0624%11 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0213%11 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0217%6 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0119%25 Mar
mirage13–11-0.048%25 Mar
dust219–22-0.0415%25 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0818%25 Mar
mirage13–100.0118%24 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0823%23 Mar
dust212–16-0.0717%19 Mar
mirage17–190.0015%19 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0325%11 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0525%11 Mar
dust29–130.0319%11 Mar
dust213–100.1124%10 Mar
dust213–9-0.0329%8 Mar
inferno14–160.0119%8 Mar
mirage10–130.0116%8 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0512%8 Mar
inferno14–16-0.036%7 Mar
inferno11–13-0.059%7 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0523%5 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0138%5 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0517%5 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0829%3 Mar
nuke0–130.0021%3 Mar
ancient13–40.0119%3 Mar
inferno19–160.0111%3 Mar
mirage13–100.0923%22 Feb
inferno13–6-0.0120%22 Feb
inferno13–90.0013%22 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0117%22 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →