Visje in het water

Visje in het water — CS2 Stats

NL76561198283160779[U:1:322895051]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,503Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,246Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,753 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,503 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,958 +3,232 20 Feb – 1 Jun · 20 days played
14,72619,006peak 19,00620 Feb1 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,753 +0 18 Sept – 23 Oct · 3 observations
1,7531,753peak 1,75318 Sept23 Oct
19,124Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,753Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-02-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,753
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 248 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches24——
Win rate50%——
K/D1.26——
Headshot %56%——

Measured 25 Sep 2026 → 27 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate47.1%46.8%48.2%1.2% short
Shot accuracy11.6%13.0%13.2%1.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.131.061.07above
Match win rate48.0%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVisje in het waterFACEITLevel 8 · 1,753 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,753csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning48
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–46–8Last 10046%Win rateLWLWTTLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −6.3pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.11
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 3–5–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 7–10–3 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility3.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.8
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact3.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time597ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 6 Apr →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · mirage, 30 Mar →
406msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · fachwerk, 16 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 6 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 55% over 20dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2511–1444%0.04
mirageC219–1243%0.02
ancientA2011–955%0.03
nukeA116–555%0.01
dust2D82–625%-0.03
overpassB63–350%0.04
anubis—43–175%0.05
fachwerk—20–20%0.04
boulder—10–10%0.04
shelter—10–10%-0.07
vertigo—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

56,322Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
2,928Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
47.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
11.6%Shot accuracy
7,652MVPs
1,202Hours (in match)
2,900Bombs planted
928Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,944
AWP4,410
AUG1,291
MP91,247
P250854

Lifetime map wins

5,670inferno
3,076vertigo
2,224nuke
2,113train
2,058dust2
56cbble
51office
24lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

554Matches
52%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
77.8ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient6656%1.2818.1
Mirage6247%1.3316.6
Inferno4762%1.2317.0
Vertigo4358%1.4120.4
Anubis4245%1.2817.1
Nuke3447%1.1216.2
Dust2743%1.0614.7
Overpass650%1.4418.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.7%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
596msReaction time
39.0%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
12.19HE damage / grenade
3.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3999 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.0234% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–90.1111%14 Oct →
inferno9–50.1633%14 Oct →
inferno4–90.0513%14 Oct →
inferno9–60.2020%14 Oct →
boulder12–120.0424%10 Oct →
fachwerk12–120.0829%10 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0419%4 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0916%26 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0315%26 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0813%26 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0629%22 Sept →
mirage13–90.0334%17 Sept →
shelter5–13-0.0721%16 Sept →
fachwerk6–130.0028%16 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0223%10 Sept →
mirage12–120.0225%16 Aug →
mirage16–140.0316%6 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0228%12 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0229%12 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0325%9 Jul →
ancient13–100.0118%1 Jun →
anubis13–90.1337%1 Jun →
mirage10–130.0332%14 May →
inferno13–50.0527%14 May →
mirage8–130.0028%29 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.0120%14 Apr →
overpass13–100.0425%14 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0421%13 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.0429%12 Apr →
ancient10–130.0537%9 Apr →
inferno6–130.0438%9 Apr →
ancient14–16-0.0431%8 Apr →
mirage13–30.1022%8 Apr →
inferno13–70.0433%8 Apr →
inferno13–70.0137%7 Apr →
dust27–130.0219%6 Apr →
inferno6–130.0626%6 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0725%6 Apr →
mirage13–10.2326%6 Apr →
inferno9–130.0626%5 Apr →
overpass9–130.0125%5 Apr →
ancient13–80.0925%4 Apr →
inferno13–50.1033%4 Apr →
ancient13–40.1012%4 Apr →
ancient6–130.0116%4 Apr →
dust213–160.0328%2 Apr →
ancient15–150.0111%2 Apr →
ancient13–60.0226%2 Apr →
mirage1–13-0.009%31 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0543%30 Mar →
overpass13–50.0824%29 Mar →
nuke5–13-0.0419%29 Mar →
inferno7–130.0534%29 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.0714%26 Mar →
inferno13–30.0629%26 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.0313%26 Mar →
ancient13–100.0224%16 Mar →
mirage8–130.0429%16 Mar →
overpass12–120.0231%15 Mar →
vertigo13–80.0733%15 Mar →
nuke16–120.0217%10 Mar →
nuke13–100.0024%10 Mar →
nuke13–60.0430%7 Mar →
mirage13–60.0533%7 Mar →
mirage13–70.0937%7 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0233%7 Mar →
ancient12–120.0226%6 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0131%4 Mar →
ancient13–7-0.0018%4 Mar →
nuke8–3-0.0723%4 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.0527%26 Feb →
ancient13–90.0620%26 Feb →
overpass9–13-0.0021%26 Feb →
nuke3–13-0.0636%24 Feb →
mirage11–130.0425%23 Feb →
ancient13–90.0319%23 Feb →
inferno13–50.0116%23 Feb →
overpass13–60.0717%20 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0226%20 Feb →
anubis13–60.0620%20 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0122%19 Feb →
nuke12–120.0531%19 Feb →
ancient16–14-0.0125%18 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0115%18 Feb →
inferno15–150.0826%17 Feb →
inferno9–130.0322%17 Feb →
dust213–11-0.0030%16 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0029%16 Feb →
ancient13–80.1019%15 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0316%15 Feb →
inferno13–90.0534%15 Feb →
mirage10–130.0232%14 Feb →
inferno11–130.0526%14 Feb →
ancient3–13-0.0414%12 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0124%12 Feb →
inferno7–130.0637%12 Feb →
nuke13–70.1129%11 Feb →
ancient13–160.0838%9 Feb →
ancient8–130.0717%9 Feb →
nuke6–130.0630%8 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.