DEGEN

DEGEN — CS2 Stats

NZ76561198282257043[U:1:321991315]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,283Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,908Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,587Purple band · top ~14.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#92724 of 227342 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 31 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,587 +1,043 31 May17 Sept · 14 days played
15,90719,999peak 19,99931 May17 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-05-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,412 below peak (19,999)
  • +711 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,413 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate32.7%43.8%44.8%12.1% short
Shot accuracy15.8%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.021.040.10 short
Match win rate36.1%44.7%45.2%9.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDEGENFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,587 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning67
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY414910Last 10041%Win rateLLTLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility3.8
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch2.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.7
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact1.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time542ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 8 Jul
39%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · nuke, 8 Jul
398msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 17 Sept
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 1 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27121544%0.03
dust2D2061430%0.03
infernoD1551033%-0.02
nukeA106460%0.08
cacheB84450%-0.01
ancientS75271%0.04
anubisD51420%-0.01
office3030%0.00
vertigo21150%0.05
debris1010%-0.27
overpass1010%-0.02
italy110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

95,205Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
4,901Matches
36.1%Match win rate
32.7%Headshot %
15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
8,008MVPs
2,229Hours (in match)
4,232Bombs planted
742Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP30,522
AK-4724,921
MP91,454
Knife1,437
FAMAS1,144
SSG 081,043

Lifetime map wins

8,795dust2
2,577inferno
1,727vertigo
1,308nuke
389train
185lake
181office
133cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
81.6ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage667%1.1617.5
Dust2367%1.4722.7
Inferno250%1.0416.0
Anubis10%0.7014.0
Nuke10%1.1714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
41.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
549msReaction time
40.4%T opening success
55.8%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
4.39HE damage / grenade
14.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4283 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–130.0114%17 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0412%17 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0122%16 Sept
dust29–130.0415%16 Sept
mirage13–110.0719%12 Sept
mirage13–30.0620%12 Sept
ancient13–80.0810%12 Sept
dust213–5-0.0111%12 Sept
cache4–13-0.0719%12 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0016%4 Sept
dust29–130.0210%4 Sept
ancient16–140.0427%4 Sept
nuke3–9-0.150%30 Aug
inferno9–60.0813%30 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1320%30 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0310%29 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0225%29 Aug
mirage13–110.0120%28 Aug
ancient16–130.0018%28 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0016%28 Aug
dust215–150.0317%23 Aug
dust213–50.1116%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0413%23 Aug
mirage16–140.048%23 Aug
dust25–130.0219%23 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0619%25 Jul
ancient11–130.0914%25 Jul
dust215–15-0.0414%25 Jul
nuke4–130.0310%24 Jul
mirage13–70.0612%24 Jul
dust26–13-0.0336%24 Jul
cache6–13-0.0119%24 Jul
dust211–130.1318%19 Jul
mirage15–150.0417%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0820%19 Jul
mirage10–130.0716%19 Jul
dust213–160.0515%19 Jul
ancient13–90.022%17 Jul
dust28–13-0.018%17 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0326%17 Jul
anubis13–100.028%17 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0510%17 Jul
nuke13–60.1230%17 Jul
mirage13–100.0215%16 Jul
mirage11–130.0511%16 Jul
cache11–5-0.075%16 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0429%16 Jul
mirage10–130.0314%16 Jul
dust213–50.1020%16 Jul
mirage9–130.0215%11 Jul
dust213–80.0531%11 Jul
cache13–60.1317%11 Jul
anubis8–130.0317%10 Jul
cache13–8-0.0313%10 Jul
mirage8–130.0421%10 Jul
mirage13–60.0416%10 Jul
debris1–9-0.2721%9 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0429%9 Jul
mirage13–80.1020%9 Jul
nuke9–50.0411%8 Jul
nuke9–10.2829%8 Jul
nuke9–20.149%8 Jul
inferno3–9-0.0717%8 Jul
nuke9–10.3439%8 Jul
inferno9–7-0.0316%8 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0015%8 Jul
dust213–110.0710%8 Jul
cache7–13-0.049%8 Jul
office12–12-0.0416%8 Jul
cache9–13-0.0320%8 Jul
office12–120.0017%8 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0114%4 Jul
overpass8–13-0.029%4 Jul
mirage8–130.0323%4 Jul
dust26–13-0.0213%4 Jul
dust29–13-0.0317%4 Jul
mirage13–60.0815%4 Jul
dust215–15-0.0114%4 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0223%4 Jul
ancient16–130.069%4 Jul
vertigo7–130.1021%27 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0316%27 Jun
nuke7–130.0223%27 Jun
inferno7–130.1415%27 Jun
dust29–13-0.0121%27 Jun
dust213–160.0315%21 Jun
inferno8–8-0.1321%21 Jun
italy13–90.0410%7 Jun
office12–120.0521%7 Jun
vertigo13–40.009%7 Jun
mirage5–130.0211%1 Jun
mirage15–150.0314%1 Jun
nuke13–20.0820%1 Jun
dust213–90.1115%31 May
mirage10–130.037%31 May
cache13–100.0315%31 May
inferno9–7-0.0419%31 May
inferno4–9-0.1320%31 May
inferno9–2-0.0116%31 May
inferno9–60.0929%31 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →