𝖗𝖆𝖑𝖋𝖘 — CS2 Stats

76561198276616051[U:1:316350323]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

920Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,707Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating21,317Top 50% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#59153 of 229579 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,552 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 920 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 15 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,317 -1,249 15 Apr – 18 Sept · 24 days played

25,120Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,552Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

36Days played since 2026-04-15

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,552
Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 199 to go
Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
Level 8 first seen 2026-09-18
Level 7 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier CS Rating

3,803 below peak (25,120)
0 over 90 days
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,683 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-18
Purple band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,334), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	41.8%	46.8%	48.3%	6.5% short
Shot accuracy	15.7%	13.0%	13.2%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.19	1.06	1.07	above
Match win rate	43.4%	46.3%	46.9%	3.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning66

Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateLWLWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −58ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 590ms

Last 10

5–5 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

9–11 · 45% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.5

Utility4.8

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels5.3

Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning6.6

Utility4.8

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels4.9

Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time567ms−9ms

first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms

Headshot accuracy16.4%+0.4%

first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 20 Apr →

33%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 7 Jun →

422msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · nuke, 7 May →

13–0Biggest win · dust2, 18 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

12–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 58% over 33nukeWeakest map · 40% over 20

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	33	19–14	58%	0.02
dust2	A	26	15–11	58%	0.01
nuke	C	20	8–12	40%	0.01
overpass	C	7	3–4	43%	0.02
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	0.02
cache	C	5	2–3	40%	0.04
inferno	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01
anubis	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,170Lifetime kills

1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players

4,921Matches

43.4%Match win rate

41.8%Headshot %

15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players

9,817MVPs

1,707Hours (in match)

4,176Bombs planted

1,046Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,230

M4A4 / M4A1-S14,373

AWP9,460

Desert Eagle5,331

P2000 / USP-S5,157

Glock-183,488

MP92,301

Galil AR1,792

P901,726

MAC-101,700

Lifetime map wins

5,862dust2

3,190nuke

2,305inferno

1,049vertigo

405train

291office

172lake

119safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

256Matches

55%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

83.2ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	61	52%	1.18	15.4
Dust2	33	64%	1.20	14.9
Nuke	24	58%	1.32	16.1
Inferno	17	47%	1.22	16.3
Ancient	12	75%	1.53	16.8
Anubis	11	73%	1.27	18.6
Train	7	29%	1.08	14.4
Overpass	6	67%	1.28	16.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy

35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.8%Spray accuracy

82.2%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

571msReaction time

49.8%T opening success

49.3%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

10.4%Flash assists

12.10HE damage / grenade

3.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.2995 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	7–13	-0.01	9%	7 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.03	20%	26 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	19%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.02	13%	14 Jun →
ancient	7–13	0.05	12%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.02	8%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.08	14%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.09	24%	10 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.07	20%	10 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	15%	9 Jun →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	13%	9 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.00	19%	9 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	11%	7 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	15%	7 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.10	33%	7 Jun →
nuke	1–13	-0.02	22%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.09	9%	5 Jun →
overpass	13–4	0.02	15%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.08	27%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.07	12%	4 Jun →
cache	4–13	0.09	18%	4 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.01	13%	3 Jun →
nuke	13–4	-0.02	24%	3 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.03	19%	3 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	9%	1 Jun →
dust2	13–2	-0.00	20%	1 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	14%	1 Jun →
mirage	3–13	0.01	20%	1 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.11	11%	31 May →
mirage	13–10	0.00	19%	31 May →
dust2	13–9	0.07	21%	31 May →
overpass	8–13	0.12	18%	30 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	6%	30 May →
dust2	13–6	0.08	18%	30 May →
dust2	13–10	0.05	15%	30 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	17%	29 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	17%	29 May →
overpass	15–15	-0.04	10%	28 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	24%	28 May →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	7%	28 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	21%	27 May →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	9%	25 May →
dust2	13–10	0.01	11%	25 May →
dust2	13–6	0.04	11%	25 May →
mirage	13–6	0.05	17%	22 May →
overpass	8–13	-0.03	19%	22 May →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	14%	22 May →
dust2	5–13	0.04	25%	22 May →
nuke	5–13	0.04	11%	22 May →
ancient	13–5	0.08	10%	22 May →
cache	3–13	0.04	12%	21 May →
nuke	9–13	0.02	19%	21 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	33%	21 May →
nuke	13–11	0.06	16%	18 May →
mirage	13–11	0.03	17%	18 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	13%	17 May →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	16%	17 May →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	13%	17 May →
anubis	13–10	0.05	13%	16 May →
cache	13–11	0.04	18%	16 May →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	19%	16 May →
cache	13–8	-0.00	23%	14 May →
mirage	13–6	0.09	13%	9 May →
overpass	13–11	0.04	17%	8 May →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	18%	8 May →
dust2	13–7	0.08	31%	8 May →
nuke	1–13	-0.04	13%	7 May →
dust2	13–7	0.06	15%	7 May →
mirage	13–11	0.02	18%	5 May →
dust2	16–14	0.01	13%	4 May →
nuke	13–11	0.07	15%	4 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	25%	4 May →
dust2	12–8	-0.05	19%	3 May →
mirage	6–13	0.05	23%	3 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	14%	3 May →
mirage	13–9	0.00	19%	3 May →
cache	16–19	0.05	21%	29 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	18%	20 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.13	21%	20 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	16%	20 Apr →
nuke	16–14	0.05	15%	19 Apr →
overpass	16–14	0.03	11%	19 Apr →
nuke	16–13	0.04	13%	19 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.03	25%	18 Apr →
nuke	8–13	0.05	14%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–16	0.01	11%	18 Apr →
dust2	13–0	0.01	12%	18 Apr →
mirage	9–13	0.04	20%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–3	0.11	12%	17 Apr →
mirage	7–13	0.02	11%	17 Apr →
nuke	13–16	-0.00	12%	17 Apr →
overpass	11–13	0.00	12%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.06	18%	17 Apr →
nuke	13–11	0.04	14%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.07	15%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	13%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–6	0.07	20%	16 Apr →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	19%	15 Apr →
ancient	13–9	0.03	13%	15 Apr →
nuke	13–9	0.06	10%	15 Apr →