pueblo peek

pueblo peek — CS2 Stats

DE76561198276112995[U:1:315847267]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

937Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80348 of 251225 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,181 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 +2,925 2 Jul – 8 Oct · 24 days played
16,92422,546peak 22,5462 Jul8 Oct
22,668Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,181Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-07-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,181
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 20 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,546 below peak (22,546)
  • -770 over 30 days · declining
  • +3,076 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpueblo peekFACEITLevel 7 · 1,181 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,181csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning50
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–46–8Last 10046%Win rateLWLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +6.0pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility5.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.0
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time614ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 6 Jul →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 1 Oct →
453msFastest reaction time · 12–4 · anubis, 13 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 3 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2215–768%0.01
ancientS1812–667%-0.00
cacheD123–925%-0.03
anubisD124–833%-0.01
infernoD123–925%-0.01
dust2C104–640%-0.04
mirageD71–614%-0.02
vertigoS54–180%0.01
train—20–20%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

221Matches
56%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
78.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3768%0.9614.8
Inferno2959%1.0415.7
Anubis2650%0.9814.0
Nuke2467%1.0816.9
Mirage2352%1.0715.8
Dust22050%0.8613.8
Cache850%0.7110.1
Overpass2100%0.629.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
619msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
40.3%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
10.08HE damage / grenade
4.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.8156% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–130.0021%8 Oct →
vertigo13–100.0521%7 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0624%5 Oct →
dust20–2-0.030%3 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0821%1 Oct →
nuke13–80.0454%1 Oct →
nuke13–10.0529%1 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0321%1 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0526%1 Oct →
ancient13–20.0521%22 Sept →
mirage13–60.0233%22 Sept →
train8–130.0325%22 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0118%22 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0915%20 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.033%18 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0511%18 Sept →
nuke11–130.0318%18 Sept →
inferno14–160.0216%17 Sept →
dust28–13-0.1017%15 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0022%15 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.019%14 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0524%13 Sept →
anubis12–40.0613%13 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0414%12 Sept →
ancient4–130.0024%11 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0418%11 Sept →
nuke13–60.0216%10 Sept →
inferno13–50.0524%9 Sept →
vertigo7–13-0.0514%9 Sept →
nuke13–70.0221%9 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0710%7 Sept →
train7–13-0.0513%6 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0517%5 Sept →
dust213–40.0126%5 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0838%5 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0319%5 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0120%4 Sept →
inferno14–160.0114%4 Sept →
ancient13–80.0311%4 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0117%4 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.003%4 Sept →
ancient10–40.0818%3 Sept →
nuke13–70.0318%3 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.0314%3 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0020%3 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0710%2 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0433%1 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0413%1 Sept →
nuke13–50.0218%1 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0123%1 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0015%1 Sept →
nuke16–120.0916%1 Sept →
dust213–70.0026%1 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0212%31 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0815%31 Aug →
vertigo13–90.0616%27 Aug →
cache2–13-0.1125%26 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0315%25 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0715%25 Aug →
cache12–120.0917%14 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0216%12 Aug →
anubis8–130.0128%11 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0527%10 Aug →
inferno12–12-0.0014%10 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0710%6 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0114%6 Aug →
nuke9–40.0427%6 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0527%5 Aug →
nuke13–70.0515%5 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0135%5 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0610%5 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0215%5 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0515%5 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0234%3 Aug →
anubis13–40.0515%3 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0429%3 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0217%3 Aug →
inferno5–130.0112%3 Aug →
ancient13–00.0212%3 Aug →
vertigo13–40.0220%29 Jul →
nuke13–90.0022%28 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0322%28 Jul →
nuke13–110.049%28 Jul →
ancient13–90.0214%20 Jul →
ancient16–12-0.0114%17 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0121%13 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0214%13 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0317%9 Jul →
cache10–13-0.068%7 Jul →
cache4–10-0.090%7 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0623%6 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0312%6 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.1114%6 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0312%6 Jul →
ancient13–10.1430%6 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0017%3 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0324%3 Jul →
nuke13–80.1121%3 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0112%2 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.017%2 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.