Lauch mit Schlauch T4

Lauch mit Schlauch T4 — CS2 Stats

76561198078554255[U:1:118288527]Steam profile ↗

600Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating16,070Purple band · top ~24.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,070 +6,050 3 Aug – 3 Oct · 18 days played
10,00018,617peak 18,6173 Aug3 Oct
19,487Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2026-08-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,547 below peak (18,617)
  • +3,200 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,930 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLauch mit Schlauch T4FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,070 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning41
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55–41–4Last 10055%Win rateWWLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +4.6pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility6.0
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.1
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time586ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–10 · dust2, 14 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 9–5 · nuke, 11 Aug →
367msFastest reaction time · 9–1 · anubis, 16 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2411–1346%-0.01
nukeA1810–856%0.00
cacheA1710–759%0.01
dust2A159–660%0.03
infernoS118–373%0.00
mirageD50–50%0.00
anubis—43–175%-0.03
vertigo—21–150%-0.05
shelter—11–0100%-0.01
train—11–0100%0.11
poseidon—10–10%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

29Matches
66%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
68.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient944%0.9613.6
Mirage580%1.4815.0
Anubis560%1.0713.2
Inferno4100%1.1313.0
Nuke367%0.8114.7
Cache10%0.5910.0
Vertigo1100%0.5011.0
Dust21100%1.2421.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
72.3%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
602msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
8.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.7983% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.9486% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–50.0819%9 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.0612%7 Oct →
dust20–2-0.010%3 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.069%2 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0233%1 Oct →
mirage11–130.0119%1 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0423%1 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0319%24 Sept →
nuke13–160.0015%24 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0417%16 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0411%16 Sept →
anubis11–130.0210%16 Sept →
nuke7–130.0121%16 Sept →
ancient13–50.038%16 Sept →
cache13–80.0213%16 Sept →
anubis9–1-0.090%16 Sept →
dust25–130.0311%16 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0311%15 Sept →
ancient13–80.0615%15 Sept →
cache13–110.0221%15 Sept →
ancient13–90.029%15 Sept →
nuke13–20.098%15 Sept →
shelter13–4-0.0115%15 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0222%15 Sept →
cache13–90.0917%15 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.089%14 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0115%14 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0219%14 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0316%14 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0310%14 Sept →
dust213–100.1225%14 Sept →
dust213–40.0615%14 Sept →
train13–30.117%14 Sept →
dust213–110.0714%13 Sept →
cache7–130.0417%13 Sept →
poseidon8–8-0.018%13 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0311%13 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0414%13 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0122%13 Sept →
anubis12–4-0.0214%13 Sept →
ancient7–130.0310%11 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0721%11 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0317%11 Sept →
inferno13–60.0420%11 Sept →
nuke13–100.0522%11 Sept →
nuke8–130.0122%11 Sept →
cache11–130.0114%11 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0122%10 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0210%10 Sept →
ancient13–100.0025%10 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0219%10 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0219%10 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0624%9 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0213%9 Sept →
dust213–80.0431%9 Sept →
cache13–70.0429%9 Sept →
nuke13–90.0019%9 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0516%7 Sept →
dust212–160.0524%7 Sept →
nuke13–100.0523%7 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0412%7 Sept →
ancient13–70.0614%7 Sept →
nuke13–100.0817%1 Sept →
dust213–40.0428%1 Sept →
cache13–50.0328%1 Sept →
ancient13–60.0713%1 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0425%1 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0620%31 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0216%31 Aug →
inferno13–30.0314%31 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0421%31 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0416%30 Aug →
inferno13–100.0322%30 Aug →
inferno13–60.0118%30 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0113%30 Aug →
mirage10–130.0619%30 Aug →
inferno13–70.0221%30 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.0314%30 Aug →
cache13–40.0124%30 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0413%30 Aug →
mirage10–130.0117%30 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0219%30 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0015%30 Aug →
nuke16–140.0119%30 Aug →
dust26–130.0213%30 Aug →
dust213–80.0727%27 Aug →
cache13–70.0515%27 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0113%27 Aug →
nuke13–100.0124%18 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.028%18 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0222%18 Aug →
dust213–30.0619%18 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.068%18 Aug →
cache13–60.0832%18 Aug →
overpass9–60.029%11 Aug →
vertigo5–9-0.0412%11 Aug →
nuke9–50.0740%11 Aug →
inferno8–80.0319%11 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.1014%4 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0520%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.