SNAAAAH T4 — CS2 Stats

76561198070723638[U:1:110457910]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

796Tracked matches38%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAll-Rounder

Premier CS Rating21,384Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#62440 of 251221 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,384 +2,488 30 Aug – 1 Oct · 21 days played

23,966Peak Premier in tracked matches

21Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

2,582 below peak (23,966)
+1,384 over 30 days · improving
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,616 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76

Positioning56

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −94ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

1–9 · 10% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

8–12 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.6

Utility5.3

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels3.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6

Positioning5.6

Utility5.3

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels4.6

Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time588ms+22ms

first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms

Headshot accuracy19.2%−3.4%

first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 23 Sept →

46%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · cache, 30 Sept →

430msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 11 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · ancient, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8dust2Weakest map · 36% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	23	11–12	48%	0.01
nuke	A	21	12–9	57%	0.02
inferno	B	13	6–7	46%	0.01
cache	B	12	6–6	50%	0.00
dust2	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.01
anubis	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
mirage	C	7	3–4	43%	0.02
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.06
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy

34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.7%Spray accuracy

88.0%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

591msReaction time

46.3%T opening success

50.4%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

8.6%Flash assists

8.05HE damage / grenade

6.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	2–13	0.00	22%	1 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.02	14%	1 Oct →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	16%	1 Oct →
ancient	13–9	0.04	13%	1 Oct →
cache	7–13	-0.02	46%	30 Sept →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	14%	30 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	28%	30 Sept →
dust2	4–13	0.01	18%	29 Sept →
anubis	9–13	0.02	26%	29 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	16%	29 Sept →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	21%	29 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.06	22%	28 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.07	13%	28 Sept →
nuke	13–2	0.07	27%	28 Sept →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	11%	28 Sept →
nuke	13–7	0.04	22%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–2	0.01	16%	28 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.05	24%	28 Sept →
inferno	9–13	0.05	13%	25 Sept →
nuke	13–9	0.02	28%	25 Sept →
nuke	13–2	0.03	19%	25 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	13%	24 Sept →
nuke	14–16	-0.04	9%	24 Sept →
nuke	13–16	-0.01	8%	24 Sept →
ancient	15–15	-0.04	14%	24 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.06	20%	24 Sept →
mirage	1–12	-0.03	15%	23 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.05	28%	23 Sept →
mirage	5–13	0.04	17%	23 Sept →
nuke	13–3	0.19	23%	23 Sept →
ancient	13–1	0.13	23%	23 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	18%	23 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.01	18%	23 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.02	37%	23 Sept →
boulder	13–11	0.02	23%	23 Sept →
fachwerk	13–3	0.04	18%	23 Sept →
vertigo	2–13	-0.05	29%	21 Sept →
vertigo	13–8	0.16	23%	21 Sept →
nuke	16–12	0.03	18%	21 Sept →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	14%	21 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	15%	16 Sept →
cache	9–13	0.01	27%	16 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.02	21%	16 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	28%	16 Sept →
ancient	13–5	0.06	20%	16 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.00	26%	16 Sept →
anubis	9–1	0.11	21%	16 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	21%	16 Sept →
inferno	15–15	0.04	19%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–7	0.02	20%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.02	34%	15 Sept →
cache	13–11	-0.06	29%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–9	0.02	25%	15 Sept →
nuke	13–2	0.13	17%	15 Sept →
shelter	13–4	0.05	16%	15 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	23%	15 Sept →
cache	13–9	-0.00	27%	15 Sept →
nuke	13–16	-0.04	24%	14 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.03	23%	14 Sept →
inferno	13–4	0.03	33%	14 Sept →
cache	14–16	-0.00	26%	14 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	28%	14 Sept →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	26%	12 Sept →
anubis	13–10	-0.06	15%	12 Sept →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	13%	12 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.09	18%	12 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.06	21%	12 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	9%	11 Sept →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	15%	11 Sept →
cache	8–13	0.01	20%	11 Sept →
inferno	13–6	0.03	20%	11 Sept →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	15%	11 Sept →
ancient	11–13	0.03	16%	11 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	24%	11 Sept →
cache	11–13	-0.00	18%	11 Sept →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	24%	10 Sept →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	34%	9 Sept →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	25%	9 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.05	33%	9 Sept →
nuke	13–9	0.00	18%	9 Sept →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	30%	5 Sept →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	30%	5 Sept →
inferno	3–13	-0.08	21%	5 Sept →
ancient	13–9	0.01	15%	5 Sept →
inferno	14–16	-0.02	20%	4 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.02	21%	4 Sept →
anubis	13–5	0.02	26%	4 Sept →
anubis	13–9	-0.00	21%	4 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	29%	3 Sept →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	18%	1 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.03	19%	1 Sept →
dust2	13–4	0.07	21%	1 Sept →
cache	13–5	0.12	25%	1 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.09	30%	1 Sept →
ancient	7–13	0.03	19%	1 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	17%	31 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.04	18%	31 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.05	31%	31 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.05	23%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.02	39%	30 Aug →