Brr Brr Uzi Schniedelwutzi

Brr Brr Uzi Schniedelwutzi — CS2 Stats

DE76561198274828368[U:1:314562640]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

578Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,673Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,434Blue band · top ~47.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,434 -2,095 8 Sept – 31 Oct · 38 days played
10,67013,714peak 13,7148 Sept31 Oct
13,896Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-09-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,280 below peak (13,714)
  • -107 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,566 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate40.4%41.8%42.7%2.3% short
Shot accuracy14.8%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.020.980.99above
Match win rate36.9%43.3%43.9%7.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBrr Brr Uzi SchniedelwutziFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER11,434 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning63
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–57–2Last 10041%Win rateLWWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · −29ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility4.8
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning6.3
Utility4.8
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time563ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 564ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 6–13 · dust2, 21 Sept →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · dust2, 21 Sept →
383msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 11 Oct →
12–1Biggest win · anubis, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 14dust2Weakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2410–1442%0.01
dust2D217–1433%0.01
cacheA148–657%0.02
ancientC114–736%0.02
infernoC94–544%-0.01
nukeC94–544%-0.02
anubisB84–450%0.00
debris—20–20%-0.04
eldorado—10–10%0.09
poseidon—10–10%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,866Lifetime kills
1.02K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
2,968Matches
36.9%Match win rate
40.4%Headshot %
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
8,234MVPs
895Hours (in match)
2,905Bombs planted
443Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,642
AWP7,380
SG 5531,291
SSG 081,269
P901,078
MP7997

Lifetime map wins

4,393dust2
3,607cbble
2,037inferno
542nuke
130train
67vertigo
39safehouse
35office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

78Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
81.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2259%1.3918.7
Dust21644%1.1215.1
Ancient650%1.1314.8
Nuke520%0.9815.2
Cache425%0.7612.5
Inferno333%0.7910.7
Anubis250%1.3414.5
Overpass1100%1.2510.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
571msReaction time
52.8%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
9.09HE damage / grenade
8.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4389 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.080%31 Oct →
dust216–130.0213%31 Oct →
ancient13–40.0013%31 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0128%30 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0111%30 Oct →
cache9–130.0228%30 Oct →
inferno13–70.0518%29 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0523%29 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0617%29 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0125%29 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0122%29 Oct →
ancient5–130.0517%28 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0224%27 Oct →
ancient13–80.0732%27 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0419%27 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0218%27 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0310%27 Oct →
nuke16–130.0210%27 Oct →
cache8–130.0030%27 Oct →
cache11–130.0521%26 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0412%25 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.1013%25 Oct →
anubis13–80.0418%24 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0711%24 Oct →
anubis12–10.0113%24 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0216%24 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.089%24 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0112%23 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0417%23 Oct →
ancient7–130.0116%23 Oct →
mirage11–130.0422%23 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0216%22 Oct →
cache13–40.0516%21 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0613%18 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0332%18 Oct →
dust213–40.0212%18 Oct →
cache13–90.0818%18 Oct →
mirage15–150.054%18 Oct →
inferno13–110.0911%17 Oct →
mirage16–140.0112%16 Oct →
mirage13–90.1016%14 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.046%13 Oct →
dust25–13-0.029%13 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0313%13 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0015%12 Oct →
ancient11–130.036%12 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0121%11 Oct →
cache11–130.0112%11 Oct →
mirage4–130.1030%8 Oct →
mirage13–90.0416%8 Oct →
nuke13–30.0314%8 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0118%8 Oct →
cache7–1-0.0512%8 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0017%8 Oct →
dust213–110.0617%8 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0316%8 Oct →
mirage13–70.099%7 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0120%6 Oct →
mirage13–70.0324%6 Oct →
anubis7–130.0215%6 Oct →
ancient13–80.1227%5 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0426%5 Oct →
mirage6–130.0426%5 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0315%4 Oct →
dust25–130.1122%3 Oct →
dust213–100.0619%26 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.076%26 Sept →
mirage13–30.0411%25 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0214%25 Sept →
cache10–130.0727%24 Sept →
nuke13–90.0316%24 Sept →
anubis8–130.0012%23 Sept →
anubis16–140.0113%23 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0114%23 Sept →
mirage7–130.0013%22 Sept →
mirage13–80.0112%22 Sept →
dust213–80.0713%22 Sept →
mirage12–160.0616%21 Sept →
dust26–130.1336%21 Sept →
cache13–110.0316%19 Sept →
dust26–130.0014%18 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.026%16 Sept →
mirage13–90.0115%16 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0530%16 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0213%14 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0220%14 Sept →
dust213–50.1216%13 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0316%13 Sept →
ancient2–130.0614%13 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0928%12 Sept →
debris4–9-0.0527%10 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0315%10 Sept →
eldorado6–90.0927%10 Sept →
poseidon7–90.0527%10 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0215%10 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0416%9 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0312%9 Sept →
mirage13–50.0631%8 Sept →
cache13–100.0616%8 Sept →
debris8–8-0.0228%8 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.