Sorenklit

Sorenklit — CS2 Stats

DK76561198272181063[U:1:311915335]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

646Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,338Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (44 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+56Tracked matches · now 646
−3.6ppWin rate · 53.6% → 50.0%

Rating over time

1,186Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-26

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate30.9%43.8%44.8%13.9% short
Shot accuracy16.6%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.901.021.030.13 short
Match win rate41.9%44.7%45.2%3.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSorenklitFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,186csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning66
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–49–9Last 10042%Win rateLLLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.2
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch0.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.6
Utility4.2
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time544ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 14 Sept →
63%Best headshot accuracy · 7–9 · nuke, 19 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 0–3 · overpass, 20 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 13 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 50% over 10mirageWeakest map · 32% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD279–1833%0.01
mirageD227–1532%0.01
cacheB136–746%0.02
vertigoB136–746%-0.02
overpassB105–550%0.02
infernoC52–340%-0.09
train—33–0100%0.00
fachwerk—21–150%0.07
anubis—21–150%0.05
poseidon—11–0100%-0.09
eldorado—10–10%-0.05
dust2—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 22). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,746Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
4,494Matches
41.9%Match win rate
30.9%Headshot %
16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
9,612MVPs
1,640Hours (in match)
3,534Bombs planted
880Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP19,377
AK-4712,585
Knife2,199
XM10141,977
SSG 081,683

Lifetime map wins

4,194inferno
3,623dust2
2,380nuke
2,347train
2,334vertigo
540cbble
350lake
207safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

867Matches
48%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
91.8ADR
30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2552%1.5020.2
Nuke1040%1.8119.3
Overpass560%1.8818.2
Ancient333%0.8612.3
Train2100%1.6423.5
Anubis20%1.1418.5
Inferno20%1.4623.0
Dust21100%1.5018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
72.0%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
531msReaction time
50.0%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
10.44HE damage / grenade
7.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4613 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–130.0123%1 Nov →
mirage9–130.0124%1 Nov →
mirage3–130.0018%27 Oct →
cache0–5-0.0133%27 Oct →
cache13–110.0927%27 Oct →
overpass5–13-0.039%20 Oct →
mirage13–100.0410%20 Oct →
cache13–90.0321%20 Oct →
nuke7–9-0.0112%20 Oct →
vertigo5–9-0.1521%20 Oct →
vertigo1–9-0.1512%19 Oct →
poseidon9–4-0.0910%19 Oct →
overpass9–6-0.0413%19 Oct →
nuke2–9-0.200%19 Oct →
nuke7–9-0.1363%19 Oct →
overpass13–70.0913%14 Oct →
vertigo13–100.0314%14 Oct →
nuke2–130.0214%14 Oct →
overpass13–11-0.0021%13 Oct →
nuke13–30.0833%13 Oct →
mirage13–00.0850%13 Oct →
inferno13–60.0320%13 Oct →
vertigo13–00.067%11 Oct →
mirage8–130.0416%11 Oct →
nuke13–80.0414%11 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0625%8 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0615%8 Oct →
overpass13–110.0519%5 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0819%5 Oct →
eldorado8–8-0.0518%4 Oct →
inferno0–9-0.2033%4 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.1127%4 Oct →
inferno9–60.0819%4 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.220%4 Oct →
nuke13–70.0511%4 Oct →
mirage3–130.0415%4 Oct →
cache13–60.0632%4 Oct →
nuke10–130.0715%29 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0921%28 Sept →
cache6–130.018%28 Sept →
vertigo9–13-0.0217%28 Sept →
mirage7–30.0121%28 Sept →
mirage13–110.0317%27 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.100%27 Sept →
vertigo1–13-0.0133%27 Sept →
nuke13–80.0726%27 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0820%26 Sept →
vertigo13–10.030%26 Sept →
mirage12–120.0616%22 Sept →
nuke7–130.0415%22 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0310%22 Sept →
nuke13–80.0617%21 Sept →
nuke4–130.0512%21 Sept →
fachwerk12–120.0824%20 Sept →
nuke8–130.0118%20 Sept →
overpass0–3-0.0425%20 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0520%19 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0214%18 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0313%17 Sept →
nuke6–130.0422%17 Sept →
mirage3–130.0713%17 Sept →
nuke13–50.0419%16 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0311%16 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.098%16 Sept →
mirage9–130.0113%15 Sept →
cache13–60.0817%15 Sept →
fachwerk13–50.0615%14 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0023%14 Sept →
cache1–6-0.0333%14 Sept →
anubis13–20.1425%14 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0129%14 Sept →
train13–80.0820%14 Sept →
mirage12–120.0214%13 Sept →
cache13–20.1223%13 Sept →
cache12–120.0232%12 Sept →
overpass8–130.0124%11 Sept →
mirage13–40.0821%11 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0418%11 Sept →
nuke13–30.0423%11 Sept →
train13–8-0.0125%11 Sept →
train13–7-0.0617%7 Sept →
mirage9–130.1014%7 Sept →
overpass13–50.0528%7 Sept →
dust213–10.0620%7 Sept →
mirage2–130.0517%7 Sept →
nuke8–130.0517%7 Sept →
nuke7–130.0016%6 Sept →
vertigo4–130.0233%3 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0236%3 Sept →
overpass12–120.0620%3 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0224%31 Aug →
cache13–110.0526%31 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0526%30 Aug →
nuke12–120.0016%30 Aug →
vertigo13–3-0.0627%30 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0618%30 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0429%30 Aug →
nuke9–70.1025%30 Aug →
overpass9–130.0523%26 Aug →
cache6–130.0121%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.