JP aych

JP aych — CS2 Stats

DE76561198266862164[U:1:306596436]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,174Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,744Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating16,734Purple band · top ~21.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,734 -2,083 20 Jul – 25 Oct · 46 days played
15,38718,817peak 18,81720 Jul25 Oct
18,998Peak Premier in tracked matches
48Days played since 2026-07-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,083 below peak (18,817)
  • +749 over 30 days · improving
  • -907 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,266 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate51.8%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy19.3%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.971.031.050.08 short
Match win rate41.8%45.2%45.7%3.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJP aychFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,734 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning56
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–56–3Last 10041%Win rateWLLLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility5.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning5.6
Utility5.8
Mechanics9.3
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time578ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy29.7%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 27.6% → last ⅓ avg 29.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 1 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · cache, 1 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · cache, 26 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 4 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 43% over 23anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3012–1840%-0.01
infernoC2310–1343%0.01
cacheC198–1142%0.02
anubisC135–838%-0.00
dust2C125–742%-0.00
nuke—21–150%-0.01
ancient—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

145,339Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
5,445Matches
41.8%Match win rate
51.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
19.3%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 6 players
14,508MVPs
3,265Hours (in match)
4,283Bombs planted
1,434Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4767,250
AWP11,575
P2502,279
UMP-452,034
FAMAS1,974

Lifetime map wins

9,880inferno
4,278dust2
1,030nuke
902train
860vertigo
729cbble
101office
60safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

495Matches
48%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
77.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1030%1.1515.7
Inferno450%1.0215.3
Nuke250%0.9615.5
Ancient20%0.9815.5
Vertigo10%0.8821.0
Anubis1100%0.8713.0
Overpass1100%1.0716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.2%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.1%Spray accuracy
91.9%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
563msReaction time
42.5%T opening success
48.9%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
8.40HE damage / grenade
7.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–110.0137%25 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0221%24 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0229%17 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0333%17 Oct →
dust213–110.0729%11 Oct →
cache13–60.1543%11 Oct →
anubis4–130.0228%11 Oct →
anubis13–80.0335%10 Oct →
mirage3–130.0035%10 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0536%9 Oct →
anubis0–3-0.0433%9 Oct →
inferno13–70.0341%8 Oct →
mirage13–50.0125%4 Oct →
cache13–00.1527%4 Oct →
dust25–130.0132%4 Oct →
dust213–50.0220%2 Oct →
anubis13–20.0630%2 Oct →
nuke13–10.0238%2 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0823%2 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0329%1 Oct →
mirage16–120.0426%1 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0224%29 Sept →
mirage16–140.0034%27 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0426%26 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0741%26 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0027%25 Sept →
ancient10–130.0125%24 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0225%23 Sept →
cache6–130.0631%23 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0327%23 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0427%23 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0415%22 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0731%22 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0136%21 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0130%20 Sept →
inferno13–100.0122%20 Sept →
mirage13–100.0017%20 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0914%19 Sept →
cache9–130.0119%19 Sept →
anubis5–130.0341%19 Sept →
cache10–130.0324%15 Sept →
mirage9–130.0319%14 Sept →
inferno13–110.0117%14 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0032%13 Sept →
cache13–70.0232%13 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0521%12 Sept →
inferno5–130.0842%11 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0120%11 Sept →
inferno11–130.0541%11 Sept →
mirage13–110.0231%8 Sept →
inferno13–160.0636%8 Sept →
mirage12–160.0242%6 Sept →
mirage6–130.1014%2 Sept →
anubis15–150.0924%2 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0021%2 Sept →
cache13–60.0250%1 Sept →
dust213–10.1623%1 Sept →
cache13–70.0027%31 Aug →
inferno13–10.0618%31 Aug →
anubis13–90.0122%31 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0612%30 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0436%30 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0728%29 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0012%29 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0619%29 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0522%29 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0224%28 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0340%28 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0228%23 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0621%21 Aug →
inferno14–160.0136%19 Aug →
inferno13–50.0418%19 Aug →
mirage13–80.0425%19 Aug →
inferno13–40.1031%19 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0122%17 Aug →
cache13–110.0625%17 Aug →
mirage9–130.0730%17 Aug →
inferno13–80.039%14 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0327%11 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0114%8 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0514%26 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0425%26 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0117%26 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0327%25 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0311%24 Jul →
mirage9–130.0138%24 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.0838%23 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0039%20 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0133%20 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.0726%20 Jul →
mirage13–70.0246%20 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0718%20 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0537%19 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.1217%19 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0130%19 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0326%19 Jul →
mirage6–130.0242%17 Jul →
cache9–130.0834%17 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0041%16 Jul →
inferno4–130.0226%16 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.