MADVILLAIN

MADVILLAIN — CS2 Stats

76561198263994444[U:1:303728716]Steam profile ↗

2,114Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,275Blue band · top ~32.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32873 of 52282 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMADVILLAINPREMIER14,275 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning60
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateWLLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression8.5
Utility4.6
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time552ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%+6.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–7
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8dust2Weakest map · 39% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2391439%-0.00
nukeC167944%-0.01
mirageB157847%0.00
anubisB157847%-0.01
infernoA138562%0.01
ancientA106460%-0.02
cacheA85363%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,042Matches
50%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
86.3ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3462%1.1718.4
Inferno1331%0.9815.3
Ancient933%1.0813.1
Vertigo850%1.1116.0
Nuke667%1.3721.8
Anubis520%0.9714.2
Dust2580%1.2217.0
Overpass333%1.0917.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.0%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
536msReaction time
35.5%T opening success
51.4%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
8.99HE damage / grenade
5.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.4685% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.0512%30 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0512%30 Aug
dust29–13-0.0350%30 Aug
mirage13–80.0228%30 Aug
dust211–5-0.02100%30 Aug
anubis8–130.0210%30 Aug
cache13–4-0.078%30 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0814%30 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0220%30 Aug
dust29–13-0.0827%29 Aug
inferno13–40.0412%29 Aug
mirage6–130.0529%29 Aug
dust210–130.0427%29 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0512%29 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0410%29 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0614%29 Aug
cache14–160.0623%29 Aug
inferno3–00.0829%29 Aug
dust213–70.1422%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0211%28 Aug
dust213–60.0124%28 Aug
anubis8–130.0318%28 Aug
mirage11–130.0114%28 Aug
cache13–80.0720%28 Aug
mirage0–50.0850%28 Aug
dust213–80.0718%27 Aug
ancient6–130.019%27 Aug
inferno11–130.1021%27 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0710%26 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0520%26 Aug
dust213–70.0219%26 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1018%26 Aug
inferno13–10.0115%24 Aug
anubis16–120.0623%24 Aug
dust215–15-0.0424%23 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0732%23 Aug
dust213–50.0325%23 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0219%23 Aug
inferno7–130.0313%22 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0327%22 Aug
mirage13–50.059%22 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0712%22 Aug
anubis10–130.0126%21 Aug
nuke11–130.0220%21 Aug
inferno8–13-0.064%16 Aug
nuke9–130.0318%16 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0518%16 Aug
dust210–13-0.0211%16 Aug
inferno13–60.0329%15 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0620%15 Aug
anubis13–90.0426%15 Aug
anubis13–60.0621%14 Aug
dust25–13-0.0610%14 Aug
anubis13–110.023%14 Aug
cache2–13-0.0829%14 Aug
mirage6–130.0113%14 Aug
nuke13–60.0121%13 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0221%13 Aug
mirage14–16-0.047%10 Aug
dust214–16-0.0329%10 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0513%10 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0130%10 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0716%10 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0325%10 Aug
inferno13–4-0.039%9 Aug
dust210–13-0.0729%9 Aug
mirage13–60.0221%9 Aug
ancient13–110.0615%9 Aug
nuke13–40.0224%7 Aug
mirage13–0-0.024%7 Aug
anubis13–110.0319%7 Aug
dust26–13-0.0532%7 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0510%5 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0223%5 Aug
anubis2–13-0.138%5 Aug
dust213–7-0.078%5 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0616%5 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0220%2 Aug
dust213–110.0726%2 Aug
cache13–9-0.0125%2 Aug
nuke13–70.089%2 Aug
dust28–13-0.0411%2 Aug
mirage13–70.028%2 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0214%2 Aug
nuke13–40.0416%2 Aug
inferno16–14-0.035%2 Aug
dust215–150.0113%2 Aug
dust213–50.068%2 Aug
inferno13–80.0613%1 Aug
mirage13–6-0.017%1 Aug
cache13–90.0621%1 Aug
anubis13–30.0221%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0027%1 Aug
nuke16–13-0.017%1 Aug
dust211–130.0019%1 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0216%31 Jul
cache7–13-0.0323%31 Jul
dust26–13-0.0119%31 Jul
nuke13–5-0.059%30 Jul
ancient13–110.0416%30 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →