BobinRalk

BobinRalk — CS2 Stats

TM76561198263304292[U:1:303038564]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,483Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,047Hours in CS
CSDB Rating1.9 LearningClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 4 · 905 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,483 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 28 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

905Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-01-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 905
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 146 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-13

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 13 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 13 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.5%42.7%43.8%4.3% short
Shot accuracy7.6%11.2%12.0%4.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.791.001.020.23 short
Match win rate43.8%43.9%44.7%0.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBobinRalkFACEITLevel 4 · 905 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO905csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim25
Positioning28
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD444610Last 10044%Win rateLLLWLLLWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −79ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim2.5
Utility2.3
Positioning2.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 31% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 52% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.5
Positioning2.8
Utility2.3
Mechanics0.5
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact3.7

Composite 1.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time607ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 673ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy12.9%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 1 Mar
33%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · office, 2 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · office, 2 Sept
13–1Biggest win · stronghold, 29 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 14% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC31131842%-0.03
dust2D1421214%-0.03
infernoS139469%-0.00
nukeC94544%-0.01
anubisD82625%-0.04
ancientA74357%-0.03
vertigoB63350%-0.05
cache_bC52340%-0.03
cache220100%0.02
office1010%-0.07
overpass1010%-0.06
stronghold110100%0.01
alpine110100%-0.01
warden110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,448Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
2,884Matches
43.8%Match win rate
39.5%Headshot %
7.6%Shot accuracy
4,348MVPs
1,047Hours (in match)
2,799Bombs planted
763Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,702inferno
2,148nuke
2,143dust2
1,499vertigo
534train
373cbble
108office
46assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

115Matches
50%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
63.1ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4452%0.8811.9
Dust21741%0.7612.0
Inferno1553%0.9414.1
Nuke1457%0.8311.5
Ancient1354%1.0013.9
Anubis540%0.659.0
Vertigo333%1.3113.3
Train333%0.7710.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.5%Headshot accuracy
28.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.3%Spray accuracy
52.4%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
605msReaction time
14.2%T opening success
31.0%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
0.4%Flash assists
7.87HE damage / grenade
3.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.4736% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2661 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 14.2388% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office0–13-0.0733%2 Sept
dust20–13-0.070%2 Sept
dust24–13-0.0921%2 Sept
mirage9–40.078%1 Sept
dust26–13-0.073%1 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0323%1 Sept
dust211–13-0.0117%23 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0013%23 Aug
mirage15–15-0.037%23 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0513%15 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0116%14 Aug
nuke7–130.0116%14 Aug
cache13–5-0.0010%14 Aug
cache13–50.057%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0410%14 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0917%14 Aug
mirage8–13-0.066%14 Aug
vertigo13–6-0.069%14 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0722%14 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0133%14 Aug
mirage6–13-0.069%14 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0516%6 May
mirage13–9-0.037%6 May
nuke15–15-0.0212%16 Apr
mirage7–13-0.1013%16 Apr
inferno13–2-0.050%2 Apr
inferno13–70.0011%2 Apr
mirage13–11-0.033%2 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0312%31 Mar
dust213–7-0.039%31 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0711%19 Mar
dust220–22-0.0615%18 Mar
dust28–130.0322%18 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0320%18 Mar
mirage9–40.0222%18 Mar
dust212–120.008%15 Mar
mirage12–12-0.079%14 Mar
anubis13–160.0117%14 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0318%14 Mar
mirage13–11-0.066%14 Mar
ancient19–17-0.005%14 Mar
cache_b8–13-0.0710%14 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0319%5 Mar
mirage13–50.0211%5 Mar
mirage19–17-0.0914%2 Mar
vertigo13–8-0.0514%1 Mar
cache_b9–13-0.0214%1 Mar
cache_b13–90.0020%1 Mar
anubis13–10-0.036%1 Mar
cache_b13–10-0.0231%1 Mar
dust28–13-0.0816%1 Mar
nuke13–70.0115%1 Mar
ancient15–150.0011%1 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0313%1 Mar
inferno16–12-0.019%1 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0821%1 Mar
mirage16–14-0.0413%1 Mar
inferno13–110.0211%1 Mar
mirage13–40.0620%1 Mar
ancient16–13-0.046%1 Mar
dust29–13-0.0029%1 Mar
vertigo7–130.0111%1 Mar
mirage8–130.0114%1 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0429%1 Mar
inferno13–20.0910%1 Mar
inferno13–70.1316%1 Mar
ancient9–13-0.053%1 Mar
mirage13–50.069%1 Mar
dust213–40.1213%21 Feb
vertigo12–16-0.064%21 Feb
mirage7–13-0.018%21 Feb
dust28–13-0.0621%21 Feb
mirage13–110.0212%21 Feb
inferno10–3-0.029%21 Feb
cache_b13–16-0.0520%21 Feb
mirage16–140.0115%21 Feb
vertigo9–13-0.0410%21 Feb
mirage2–13-0.1117%21 Feb
anubis13–16-0.0417%21 Feb
mirage10–13-0.048%21 Feb
dust26–13-0.0618%20 Feb
ancient14–16-0.0011%20 Feb
vertigo13–8-0.0812%20 Feb
mirage13–9-0.029%20 Feb
nuke12–12-0.027%20 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0811%20 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0123%20 Feb
mirage10–130.0416%12 Feb
dust212–12-0.0415%12 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0112%4 Feb
overpass11–13-0.066%4 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0312%4 Feb
anubis9–13-0.035%30 Jan
nuke12–12-0.0322%29 Jan
stronghold13–10.015%29 Jan
alpine13–4-0.015%29 Jan
warden11–30.0115%29 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0321%28 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0410%28 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0619%28 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →