Juden Jäger Jens

Juden Jäger Jens — CS2 Stats

CN76561198261655722[U:1:301389994]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

92Tracked matches79%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidOpening Duellist
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim99
Positioning67
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–30–10Last 9056%Win rateWWLWLWLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.08 avg rating · −4.3pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 5–13–2 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 90 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Opening Duellist — Winning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+2.4 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.

Aim9.9
Utility2.0
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels8.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 61% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; higher opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 99 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 69% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 69% on CT to 6% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.9
Positioning6.7
Utility2.0
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.10
first ⅓ avg 0.08 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time531ms+84ms
first ⅓ avg 447ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy31.1%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 32.9% → last ⅓ avg 31.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 90 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 8–8 · inferno, 3 Nov →
88%Best headshot accuracy · 3–9 · mirage, 23 Oct →
156msFastest reaction time · 9–0 · nuke, 9 Jun →
16–1Biggest win · inferno, 29 Oct →

Across the last 90 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 79% over 24vertigoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB3014–1647%0.03
mirageS2419–579%0.11
nukeC125–742%0.04
cacheA95–456%0.11
vertigoD72–529%0.01
overpassS64–267%0.00
ancient—10–10%0.14
train—11–0100%0.15

Across the last 90 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

35.5%Headshot accuracy
46.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
5.1°Preaim
411msReaction time
5.9%T opening success
69.0%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
10.01HE damage / grenade
6.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4347 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 5.8861% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–70.0340%24 Aug →
nuke13–80.0238%24 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0134%19 Aug →
mirage13–90.0325%19 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0214%19 Aug →
overpass13–6-0.0427%17 Aug →
overpass6–9-0.0322%14 Dec →
nuke6–9-0.1311%14 Dec →
inferno4–9-0.1514%12 Dec →
inferno8–8-0.0216%12 Dec →
inferno0–9-0.2225%12 Feb →
inferno1–9-0.188%12 Feb →
inferno5–9-0.160%9 Jul →
vertigo7–9-0.0223%11 Apr →
vertigo5–9-0.0560%8 Apr →
vertigo3–9-0.0980%2 Apr →
inferno5–9-0.105%2 Apr →
overpass9–1-0.0333%2 Apr →
vertigo8–8-0.1421%1 Apr →
overpass7–9-0.0929%31 Mar →
overpass9–60.079%31 Mar →
inferno8–8-0.1135%31 Mar →
nuke6–13-0.1130%18 Mar →
mirage13–6-0.0331%14 Nov →
inferno8–00.0943%14 Nov →
cache16–50.1940%25 Jun →
inferno8–80.0226%25 Jun →
nuke9–00.2076%9 Jun →
nuke9–00.2671%9 Jun →
mirage9–40.1846%9 Jun →
mirage16–30.2064%4 Jan →
inferno16–40.1026%4 Jan →
nuke6–160.0534%21 Nov →
mirage9–6-0.0125%21 Nov →
mirage16–130.1023%17 Nov →
inferno16–100.2158%17 Nov →
inferno9–50.1043%16 Nov →
inferno9–10.1535%16 Nov →
mirage9–50.1540%15 Nov →
ancient15–150.1418%14 Nov →
inferno9–40.0829%9 Nov →
cache9–70.1241%9 Nov →
train16–100.1543%9 Nov →
cache3–90.0928%7 Nov →
mirage3–90.1233%7 Nov →
nuke9–20.0839%7 Nov →
vertigo9–10.1122%7 Nov →
mirage9–60.1026%6 Nov →
mirage5–90.0450%6 Nov →
mirage9–50.1137%6 Nov →
inferno8–80.3136%3 Nov →
mirage2–90.0229%2 Nov →
mirage9–70.1624%2 Nov →
mirage9–10.2247%30 Oct →
cache3–90.1347%30 Oct →
cache16–20.1950%29 Oct →
inferno16–10.0713%29 Oct →
inferno8–80.0628%28 Oct →
mirage9–30.1542%28 Oct →
cache9–50.1127%28 Oct →
inferno8–80.1273%28 Oct →
mirage16–90.1234%28 Oct →
inferno15–40.2231%27 Oct →
inferno8–80.1222%27 Oct →
vertigo9–20.0731%27 Oct →
nuke7–90.1217%27 Oct →
inferno9–40.1638%27 Oct →
mirage16–90.1123%26 Oct →
mirage9–10.1760%24 Oct →
mirage9–60.0633%24 Oct →
mirage9–10.3055%24 Oct →
mirage3–90.2688%23 Oct →
cache5–90.1672%23 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0388%23 Oct →
inferno9–30.0823%23 Oct →
inferno9–60.2027%23 Oct →
overpass9–40.1421%21 Oct →
vertigo5–90.1627%21 Oct →
mirage9–70.0519%2 Aug →
inferno9–3-0.0223%7 Feb →
inferno9–4-0.0240%7 Feb →
inferno6–9-0.0021%7 Feb →
nuke15–15-0.038%6 Feb →
inferno6–9-0.0524%6 Feb →
inferno16–50.0022%30 Jan →
mirage13–160.0016%29 Oct →
nuke11–160.009%16 Oct →
cache16–130.0016%12 Oct →
mirage16–140.009%25 Sept →
inferno11–160.0016%19 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Aim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.