i use arch btw

i use arch btw — CS2 Stats

76561198196641113[U:1:236375385]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

235Tracked matches80%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongOpening Duellist
Premier CS Rating23,934Top 25% of 203,074 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31610 of 250048 tracked
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Jan 2024 (995 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,934 +3,183 6 Dec – 15 Jan · 13 days played
20,75124,894peak 24,8946 Dec15 Jan
24,894Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2023-11-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 960 below peak (24,894)
  • -640 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,066 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGi use arch btwPREMIER23,934 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning63
Utility13

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY78–17–5Last 10078%Win rateLTWWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +6.2pp headshot accuracy · −58ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Opening Duellist — Winning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+2 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.

Aim9.5
Utility1.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels6.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 5% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning6.3
Utility1.3
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.11
first ⅓ avg 0.12 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time576ms+124ms
first ⅓ avg 451ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.41Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 6 Dec →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · inferno, 15 Dec →
219msFastest reaction time · 9–3 · inferno, 6 Dec →
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 14 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

22Longest win streak
11–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 85% over 13mirageWeakest map · 73% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS3123–874%0.09
nukeS2318–578%0.08
vertigoS1714–382%0.09
overpassS1311–285%0.10
mirageS118–373%0.05
ancient—22–0100%0.02
dust2—22–0100%0.13
palais—10–10%-0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (73% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.6%Spray accuracy
88.4%Counter-strafing
6.7°Preaim
479msReaction time
4.9%T opening success
61.3%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
12.42HE damage / grenade
6.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 4.935% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–9-0.0318%2 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0538%1 Oct →
overpass9–7-0.1030%1 Oct →
vertigo9–40.1524%30 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0833%26 Dec →
inferno9–7-0.0311%26 Dec →
inferno9–7-0.068%6 Jul →
inferno0–9-0.1125%12 Feb →
inferno1–9-0.0810%12 Feb →
inferno4–90.0111%10 Feb →
overpass9–20.1215%3 Feb →
vertigo9–40.0715%3 Feb →
inferno4–9-0.118%23 Jan →
inferno9–60.0515%22 Jan →
nuke13–6-0.0716%20 Jan →
mirage5–130.0116%20 Jan →
nuke9–7-0.0321%17 Jan →
inferno4–9-0.076%9 Jan →
nuke5–9-0.200%8 Jan →
palais3–9-0.1833%6 Jan →
inferno9–60.1345%16 Jan →
overpass9–4-0.1120%16 Jan →
overpass9–20.2022%16 Jan →
inferno9–30.1752%16 Jan →
nuke9–60.1138%15 Jan →
overpass6–90.0136%15 Jan →
nuke9–30.1433%15 Jan →
vertigo8–80.0339%15 Jan →
nuke8–8-0.007%15 Jan →
mirage13–7-0.0624%15 Jan →
vertigo8–8-0.019%15 Jan →
vertigo9–70.1528%15 Jan →
overpass9–10.4040%15 Jan →
inferno9–10.4040%15 Jan →
nuke9–20.2635%15 Jan →
overpass9–20.1725%15 Jan →
nuke9–30.0745%15 Jan →
inferno9–50.3121%14 Jan →
nuke9–60.2414%14 Jan →
nuke3–9-0.0827%14 Jan →
inferno9–10.2847%14 Jan →
overpass13–00.2034%14 Jan →
vertigo9–130.0520%14 Jan →
overpass6–90.0119%14 Jan →
inferno13–90.0227%13 Jan →
inferno9–10.1456%13 Jan →
inferno13–00.1927%9 Jan →
nuke13–20.1050%9 Jan →
mirage13–110.0929%20 Dec →
vertigo13–00.1211%20 Dec →
nuke9–50.2122%18 Dec →
nuke9–70.1117%18 Dec →
inferno13–9-0.0332%18 Dec →
inferno13–90.0210%16 Dec →
nuke9–40.1524%16 Dec →
vertigo9–7-0.049%15 Dec →
vertigo9–20.0624%15 Dec →
inferno9–40.1950%15 Dec →
inferno9–20.09100%15 Dec →
mirage13–20.1325%15 Dec →
inferno9–10.0436%15 Dec →
inferno9–5-0.0122%15 Dec →
mirage13–20.1017%15 Dec →
nuke9–10.2638%15 Dec →
overpass9–7-0.0015%15 Dec →
ancient13–70.0413%15 Dec →
nuke9–130.0616%14 Dec →
inferno4–13-0.0122%14 Dec →
overpass13–50.1219%14 Dec →
nuke9–00.3720%14 Dec →
nuke9–20.0925%14 Dec →
vertigo9–50.1210%14 Dec →
vertigo9–7-0.0221%14 Dec →
vertigo9–30.2019%14 Dec →
overpass9–30.1333%14 Dec →
mirage14–160.0515%12 Dec →
vertigo13–110.0621%12 Dec →
mirage13–7-0.0114%11 Dec →
nuke9–30.0324%11 Dec →
nuke13–100.0417%11 Dec →
inferno13–20.0418%10 Dec →
ancient13–2-0.0019%10 Dec →
vertigo13–70.1522%7 Dec →
mirage13–10.1716%7 Dec →
mirage13–50.0511%7 Dec →
vertigo9–50.129%7 Dec →
dust213–50.1117%7 Dec →
vertigo9–30.2315%7 Dec →
nuke9–00.1232%7 Dec →
mirage13–50.149%7 Dec →
nuke13–9-0.0132%7 Dec →
inferno13–20.1519%6 Dec →
inferno8–80.1024%6 Dec →
inferno9–30.1915%6 Dec →
inferno9–40.2921%6 Dec →
inferno9–30.4131%6 Dec →
inferno13–70.1137%6 Dec →
vertigo13–10.0422%6 Dec →
overpass9–40.1818%3 Dec →
dust213–20.1529%29 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches22-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.