YASHRU

YASHRU — CS2 Stats

76561198260623599[U:1:300357871]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,213Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,061Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,808 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (34 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−46Faceit ELO · 1,854 → 1,808

Rating over time

20,714Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,854Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
75Days played since 2026-01-19

Faceit ELO

  • 46 below peak (1,854)
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 193 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-24
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.1%46.8%48.2%5.2% short
Shot accuracy10.6%13.0%13.2%2.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.091.061.07meets
Match win rate40.0%46.3%46.9%6.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGYASHRUFACEITLevel 8 · 1,808 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,854csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning62
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateLWLWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility7.4
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 42% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning6.2
Utility7.4
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time599ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy14.2%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 6 Aug →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 4–5 · nuke, 25 Mar →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · cache, 29 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 21 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A4427–1761%0.01
mirageB147–750%-0.03
ancientD124–833%-0.02
infernoD82–625%-0.02
anubisC73–443%-0.00
cacheS54–180%-0.02
overpassC52–340%-0.02
nuke—40–40%-0.00
train—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

320,044Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
12,622Matches
40.0%Match win rate
43.1%Headshot %
10.6%Shot accuracy
32,366MVPs
5,133Hours (in match)
10,064Bombs planted
2,594Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47117,497
AWP28,498
P9019,546
Glock-1816,073
FAMAS5,806
SSG 084,519

Lifetime map wins

81,811dust2
8,679inferno
4,681vertigo
1,836nuke
1,420train
189cbble
130lake
74ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,501Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
87.9ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust260359%1.1217.3
Ancient37252%1.0817.3
Mirage32040%0.9415.5
Inferno18141%0.9815.9
Anubis9338%0.9015.3
Nuke5939%0.8915.0
Vertigo5342%1.0416.6
Overpass3247%0.9015.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.0%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
600msReaction time
41.7%T opening success
60.0%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
12.4%Flash assists
12.34HE damage / grenade
12.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.9837% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0615%9 Nov →
ancient13–100.029%15 Oct →
dust210–130.0318%29 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0214%22 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0314%13 Sept →
inferno7–130.0112%13 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0117%1 Sept →
anubis13–60.0413%29 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0914%29 Aug →
nuke4–130.0110%29 Aug →
cache13–5-0.1111%29 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0425%29 Aug →
mirage13–20.029%21 Aug →
inferno13–60.0513%18 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.068%15 Aug →
cache13–100.0319%13 Aug →
inferno5–130.0111%12 Aug →
inferno9–50.1414%6 Aug →
nuke6–9-0.0421%1 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.1922%30 Jul →
dust213–100.0919%29 Jul →
dust213–90.0316%29 Jul →
ancient9–130.0110%10 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0114%10 Jul →
dust213–4-0.0214%10 Jul →
dust213–70.0016%10 Jul →
dust26–130.0615%8 Jul →
overpass9–40.0215%8 Jul →
dust213–100.0914%7 Jul →
dust213–90.0514%7 Jul →
nuke11–130.0719%6 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.069%5 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.059%2 Jul →
dust213–30.0717%2 Jul →
dust28–130.036%1 Jul →
dust213–4-0.0219%30 Jun →
dust213–100.046%24 Jun →
dust22–60.1121%24 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.088%20 Jun →
dust212–6-0.0120%16 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0010%7 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.019%3 Jun →
cache10–13-0.0318%22 May →
mirage5–13-0.0322%20 May →
ancient8–13-0.023%19 May →
inferno8–13-0.086%17 May →
dust215–15-0.0314%15 May →
ancient3–130.028%11 May →
dust211–13-0.0310%4 May →
mirage13–50.0219%4 May →
ancient16–130.0112%2 May →
cache13–40.042%29 Apr →
anubis8–130.0813%29 Apr →
dust29–130.0316%28 Apr →
overpass14–16-0.0414%27 Apr →
anubis13–4-0.0316%23 Apr →
train9–13-0.0211%22 Apr →
dust213–7-0.0326%20 Apr →
dust28–130.0714%17 Apr →
dust213–20.088%17 Apr →
dust213–70.0715%16 Apr →
overpass9–13-0.0414%13 Apr →
dust24–130.0416%13 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0819%11 Apr →
dust28–130.0623%2 Apr →
dust213–50.0625%31 Mar →
mirage14–16-0.0317%30 Mar →
inferno11–130.0117%28 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0117%27 Mar →
nuke4–5-0.0667%25 Mar →
mirage13–110.0111%25 Mar →
dust213–7-0.059%24 Mar →
dust213–5-0.0513%24 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0620%17 Mar →
dust213–50.0120%15 Mar →
overpass13–70.017%14 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.045%9 Mar →
dust213–7-0.0421%7 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.083%2 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.087%1 Mar →
anubis15–15-0.009%28 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0113%28 Feb →
dust213–80.049%24 Feb →
overpass4–13-0.047%22 Feb →
dust25–13-0.039%21 Feb →
dust216–120.0417%21 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0613%19 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0411%13 Feb →
inferno4–9-0.0911%12 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0020%12 Feb →
anubis13–110.0212%10 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.049%7 Feb →
dust213–80.0220%5 Feb →
dust23–13-0.0222%3 Feb →
mirage13–16-0.028%3 Feb →
dust216–13-0.0119%3 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.0615%3 Feb →
ancient14–160.028%23 Jan →
dust213–11-0.009%22 Jan →
mirage13–11-0.0214%19 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.