Affects

Affects — CS2 Stats

76561198259154870[U:1:298889142]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

503Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,099Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 503 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

62Days played since 2026-05-04

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches2——
Win rate50%——
K/D2.00——
Headshot %96%——

Measured 21 Sep 2026 → 18 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,126), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate61.2%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy13.6%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.441.061.07above
Match win rate41.8%46.3%46.9%5.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAffectsFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning72
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–51–1Last 10048%Win rateLWLLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.4
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 44% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning7.2
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time570ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 25.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 23 May →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 27 May →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 13 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 13 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2111–1052%0.02
mirageA2112–957%-0.01
ancientD206–1430%0.00
infernoC114–736%0.03
anubisS96–367%0.03
nukeD61–517%0.01
vertigo—31–233%0.00
cache—32–167%-0.00
train—21–150%0.12
overpass—22–0100%0.03
office—22–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,332Lifetime kills
1.44K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
2,604Matches
41.8%Match win rate
61.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
13.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
8,663MVPs
1,374Hours (in match)
1,502Bombs planted
685Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,855dust2
2,504inferno
718train
558vertigo
457nuke
205cbble
123office
22bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

553Matches
51%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
83.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9151%1.1016.6
Dust27250%1.2017.2
Ancient5847%1.2117.3
Inferno5153%1.1816.1
Cache2250%1.2615.3
Anubis2050%1.2118.5
Overpass1580%1.3816.3
Nuke1233%1.0615.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.7%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
576msReaction time
43.9%T opening success
59.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
9.7%Flash assists
9.30HE damage / grenade
9.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–130.0633%30 Aug →
dust213–80.0130%27 Aug →
inferno0–10-0.0522%27 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0429%26 Aug →
dust216–140.0016%20 Aug →
ancient13–100.0526%19 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0216%18 Aug →
dust213–80.0523%18 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.039%17 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0323%17 Aug →
ancient9–130.0528%17 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0716%14 Aug →
ancient13–90.0530%13 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0223%13 Aug →
ancient13–30.0754%13 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0211%11 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0224%11 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0338%9 Aug →
dust213–100.0623%9 Aug →
anubis8–130.0419%8 Aug →
dust213–70.0025%8 Aug →
vertigo9–130.0238%7 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0528%7 Aug →
nuke10–130.0129%2 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0727%30 Jul →
anubis13–90.0816%30 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0122%29 Jul →
mirage16–140.0223%26 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0023%23 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0230%22 Jul →
mirage7–130.0138%20 Jul →
dust213–70.0324%20 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0615%18 Jul →
cache14–16-0.0431%15 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0028%15 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0219%11 Jul →
anubis13–60.0021%10 Jul →
nuke16–140.1039%10 Jul →
mirage13–40.0430%10 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0916%7 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0324%4 Jul →
anubis19–16-0.0122%3 Jul →
ancient11–130.019%3 Jul →
ancient11–130.0431%3 Jul →
anubis13–40.0615%3 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0416%30 Jun →
dust22–13-0.1318%25 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0121%24 Jun →
train12–120.1233%19 Jun →
train13–70.1132%17 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.089%15 Jun →
inferno9–130.0115%14 Jun →
inferno13–90.0430%14 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0125%12 Jun →
dust213–80.0116%9 Jun →
mirage11–130.0622%9 Jun →
anubis13–70.1113%9 Jun →
dust213–80.0118%8 Jun →
overpass13–110.0831%6 Jun →
vertigo3–13-0.0531%5 Jun →
ancient17–190.0422%4 Jun →
inferno11–130.0113%4 Jun →
vertigo13–70.0425%3 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0126%2 Jun →
cache13–10-0.0518%2 Jun →
dust216–130.0320%29 May →
mirage13–9-0.0314%28 May →
anubis13–20.1017%27 May →
anubis6–13-0.0718%27 May →
dust27–130.0660%27 May →
inferno10–13-0.0126%26 May →
inferno10–13-0.0018%25 May →
ancient7–13-0.0220%25 May →
ancient13–50.0528%25 May →
ancient6–13-0.0213%24 May →
dust213–40.1627%23 May →
dust27–130.1541%23 May →
mirage13–100.0725%21 May →
mirage13–9-0.0113%21 May →
ancient13–30.0511%20 May →
mirage13–60.0130%20 May →
ancient14–160.008%19 May →
dust28–13-0.0027%19 May →
inferno16–19-0.0018%18 May →
office13–3-0.0046%14 May →
dust210–13-0.0212%14 May →
mirage16–14-0.0113%13 May →
inferno13–10.1427%13 May →
office13–30.0834%13 May →
ancient2–13-0.0332%13 May →
mirage13–100.0421%12 May →
inferno13–60.0829%11 May →
ancient11–13-0.0131%9 May →
mirage5–13-0.0625%8 May →
cache13–80.0824%8 May →
dust211–130.0136%7 May →
inferno11–130.0728%7 May →
dust213–110.0238%5 May →
overpass13–9-0.0220%4 May →
mirage7–13-0.0611%4 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.