Phantom-_ — CS2 Stats

76561198256371590[U:1:296105862]

1,647Tracked matches67%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,804Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,301 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning56

Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–42–6Last 10052%Win rateLLWWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2

Aggression7.3

Utility4.8

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning5.6

Utility4.8

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time601ms−16ms

first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms

Headshot accuracy27.3%−1.9%

first ⅓ avg 29.2% → last ⅓ avg 27.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 9–4

13–1Biggest win — mirage

11Longest win streak

L2Current streak

6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 66% over 35infernoWeakest map · 29% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	35	23–12	66%	0.00
nuke	A	16	9–7	56%	0.04
inferno	D	14	4–10	29%	0.01
ancient	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.00
cache	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.01
dust2	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

984Matches

52%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

78.7ADR

56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	297	49%	1.03	15.4
Ancient	206	54%	1.07	17.1
Anubis	176	56%	1.15	16.8
Nuke	115	52%	1.10	16.2
Vertigo	74	51%	1.08	15.9
Inferno	52	54%	1.30	16.5
Dust2	32	50%	0.88	14.5
Overpass	31	55%	0.89	14.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.1%Headshot accuracy

33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.8%Spray accuracy

84.9%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

605msReaction time

35.0%T opening success

46.7%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

4.4%Flash assists

8.04HE damage / grenade

9.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4873 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.9569% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	3–13	-0.07	22%	24 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.00	27%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	21%	23 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.04	18%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	26%	19 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	19%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	29%	17 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.08	33%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	31%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	27%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	29%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	24%	13 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	17%	13 Aug →
nuke	8–8	-0.01	25%	12 Aug →
nuke	9–3	0.02	23%	12 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	25%	12 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	37%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	30%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.07	30%	8 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.05	33%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	27%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	28%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.01	27%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	42%	8 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.04	26%	7 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.02	27%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.12	31%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.05	38%	7 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	32%	7 Aug →
nuke	1–13	0.04	26%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	15%	7 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.03	26%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	30%	5 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.03	31%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.05	33%	5 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	27%	4 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	35%	4 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.07	33%	4 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	28%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.05	38%	3 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.00	30%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.09	35%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.10	38%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	23%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.07	33%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.07	41%	3 Aug →
inferno	12–16	0.05	43%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	37%	3 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.04	36%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	47%	2 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.07	35%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.06	25%	2 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	31%	2 Aug →
nuke	9–4	0.15	27%	2 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	38%	2 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.06	36%	23 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.11	67%	23 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	7%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	18%	23 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.06	19%	23 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	19%	22 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.06	10%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.05	27%	21 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.05	21%	21 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.02	27%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.04	37%	20 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.00	21%	20 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.02	22%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	31%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.04	25%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–16	-0.01	26%	19 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.05	53%	19 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	8%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	45%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–1	-0.02	21%	18 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.02	23%	18 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.01	29%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	20%	18 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.01	33%	18 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	18%	18 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.03	23%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	13%	18 Jul →
cache	0–9	-0.11	0%	17 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	26%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.03	28%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.07	37%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	28%	17 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	26%	17 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.06	31%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.06	44%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.03	36%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.05	44%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	30%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.05	36%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.00	37%	15 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	54%	15 Jul →
dust2	12–16	0.03	22%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	36%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.00	31%	14 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.01	27%	14 Jul →