DeRamos

DeRamos — CS2 Stats

ES76561198254484575[U:1:294218847]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,143Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,829Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating27,484Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3628 of 219839 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 30 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,484 +412 30 May16 Sept · 29 days played
26,58028,329peak 28,32930 May16 Sept
28,368Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-05-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 845 below peak (28,329)
  • +333 over 30 days · steady
  • +904 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,516 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches312−9
Win rate67%67%0pp
K/D0.590.77−0.18
Headshot %37%33%+4pp

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate51.8%45.8%46.8%above
Shot accuracy15.7%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.761.051.060.30 short
Match win rate44.3%45.7%46.3%2.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDeRamosFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER27,484 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning36
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53434Last 10053%Win rateWLLLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.9 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility7.6
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning3.6
Utility7.6
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time552ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 15 Jul
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · ancient, 27 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 8–2 · nuke, 14 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 6 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB22111150%0.00
dust2C2071335%-0.01
ancientA1710759%0.01
infernoB137654%-0.01
nukeS118373%0.01
anubisA74357%0.04
cacheS54180%0.01
overpassC52340%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

243,838Lifetime kills
0.76K/D
7,791Matches
44.3%Match win rate
51.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
17,895MVPs
5,829Hours (in match)
9,832Bombs planted
2,293Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4783,106
AWP33,847
MP97,644
MAC-106,044
SSG 084,932
P2504,308

Lifetime map wins

15,502dust2
11,834inferno
3,277vertigo
3,271nuke
2,023train
554cbble
251lake
224safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
576msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
23.4%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
11.09HE damage / grenade
21.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7802% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–7-0.0940%16 Sept
dust29–130.0728%16 Sept
dust25–13-0.0343%15 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0825%9 Sept
mirage13–70.0634%9 Sept
inferno1–13-0.070%9 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0217%7 Sept
inferno5–130.0121%7 Sept
inferno13–1-0.025%7 Sept
anubis9–130.0825%7 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0310%6 Sept
mirage13–00.010%6 Sept
mirage13–40.0027%4 Sept
anubis13–50.0521%4 Sept
mirage13–00.048%4 Sept
anubis13–110.1015%3 Sept
mirage2–13-0.1327%27 Aug
ancient1–13-0.06100%27 Aug
dust20–3-0.160%27 Aug
dust213–8-0.0424%27 Aug
dust20–3-0.0633%27 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0214%26 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0614%26 Aug
mirage13–30.0433%26 Aug
nuke13–30.0544%26 Aug
cache13–50.0225%26 Aug
nuke0–13-0.080%26 Aug
dust213–70.0528%26 Aug
cache13–50.0224%26 Aug
nuke0–2-0.060%26 Aug
mirage7–130.0217%14 Aug
nuke8–2-0.048%14 Aug
mirage9–13-0.018%9 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0318%9 Aug
dust213–5-0.0421%8 Aug
cache13–90.0019%7 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0215%7 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0717%7 Aug
dust22–130.0317%30 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0415%30 Jul
inferno13–7-0.018%30 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0338%29 Jul
inferno13–80.0747%29 Jul
dust213–110.0214%29 Jul
nuke13–60.0322%29 Jul
ancient13–10.0524%29 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0027%29 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0217%29 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0431%29 Jul
dust26–130.0119%29 Jul
cache13–10-0.0016%28 Jul
dust23–13-0.0920%28 Jul
ancient13–10.0615%28 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0119%28 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0322%28 Jul
nuke13–90.0138%22 Jul
nuke13–50.0824%22 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0317%22 Jul
ancient13–50.1313%15 Jul
inferno13–40.0721%9 Jul
mirage7–1-0.0020%9 Jul
nuke13–90.0126%9 Jul
anubis13–30.0130%3 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0319%3 Jul
overpass13–20.1225%2 Jul
ancient3–130.0138%2 Jul
mirage15–150.0315%2 Jul
overpass10–130.0216%2 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0030%1 Jul
mirage13–100.0322%1 Jul
dust215–150.0224%1 Jul
ancient13–70.0932%1 Jul
overpass13–100.1029%1 Jul
inferno5–130.0321%1 Jul
cache5–130.0121%1 Jul
anubis13–60.0521%25 Jun
dust211–00.0417%25 Jun
overpass11–130.0122%25 Jun
ancient13–100.1230%24 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0226%24 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0029%19 Jun
mirage9–130.0123%19 Jun
mirage8–130.0418%17 Jun
ancient5–12-0.0029%16 Jun
dust27–13-0.0220%16 Jun
dust211–130.0315%12 Jun
mirage13–70.0235%12 Jun
dust213–70.0529%12 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0312%11 Jun
ancient0–30.0422%11 Jun
dust211–13-0.0226%11 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0419%11 Jun
mirage13–40.0421%8 Jun
nuke13–100.1322%8 Jun
dust212–120.0519%8 Jun
anubis11–130.0212%30 May
mirage4–130.0419%30 May
overpass0–13-0.0623%30 May
dust24–13-0.0122%30 May
nuke13–110.0113%30 May

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →