John Johnsen Adamec

John Johnsen Adamec — CS2 Stats

DE76561198252994172[U:1:292728444]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,977Tracked matches63%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,935Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#95053 of 247887 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,210 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−403Premier CS Rating · 19,338 → 18,935

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,935 +940 28 Aug – 1 Oct · 25 days played
16,43120,104peak 20,10428 Aug1 Oct
20,104Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,210Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,210
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 141 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,169 below peak (20,104)
  • +1,751 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,065 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJohn Johnsen AdamecFACEITLevel 8 · 1,210 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,935 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,210csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning48
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −5.6pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.8
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time528ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy25.5%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 16 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · mirage, 12 Sept →
219msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · mirage, 12 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 21 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 20mirageWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2212–1055%0.02
ancientA2012–860%-0.00
cacheB1910–953%0.02
anubisB105–550%-0.00
nukeC94–544%0.03
mirageC83–538%-0.02
dust2A74–357%-0.01
poseidon—20–20%-0.15
office—21–150%0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

683Matches
49%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
75.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno16353%1.1815.9
Mirage8545%1.0013.6
Anubis8449%1.1014.7
Dust28341%1.0414.1
Ancient7149%1.1516.0
Nuke6456%1.0915.3
Cache4747%1.2716.4
Overpass3373%1.2315.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.9%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.1%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
513msReaction time
29.6%T opening success
43.6%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
12.50HE damage / grenade
10.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.47 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6363% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.0522%1 Oct →
ancient1–8-0.0225%26 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0113%26 Sept →
nuke13–40.0814%25 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0518%25 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0115%23 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0433%23 Sept →
inferno13–40.0634%21 Sept →
nuke13–10.1022%21 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0414%21 Sept →
inferno16–120.048%20 Sept →
inferno16–120.0515%20 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0215%20 Sept →
ancient13–70.0429%19 Sept →
ancient13–10.0426%19 Sept →
cache13–90.0126%19 Sept →
cache4–130.0828%18 Sept →
cache13–20.0628%17 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0157%17 Sept →
inferno13–70.0236%17 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0319%17 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0029%17 Sept →
ancient13–70.0127%16 Sept →
inferno13–90.0317%16 Sept →
ancient13–80.0516%16 Sept →
cache13–30.1132%16 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0128%16 Sept →
anubis0–13-0.0333%16 Sept →
ancient13–1-0.0224%16 Sept →
dust213–100.0435%16 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0716%16 Sept →
cache13–30.1446%16 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0142%15 Sept →
inferno13–80.1016%15 Sept →
ancient11–130.0430%15 Sept →
anubis13–40.0523%15 Sept →
inferno13–60.0318%14 Sept →
anubis10–130.0926%14 Sept →
dust213–100.0315%14 Sept →
inferno13–90.0219%14 Sept →
cache13–30.0820%14 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0116%14 Sept →
cache1–130.0030%14 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0617%14 Sept →
inferno10–130.0329%13 Sept →
inferno1–70.0318%13 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0427%13 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0018%13 Sept →
mirage0–4-0.02100%12 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.0626%12 Sept →
poseidon6–9-0.110%12 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0733%12 Sept →
inferno8–130.0020%11 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0223%11 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0310%11 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0229%10 Sept →
ancient13–90.0123%10 Sept →
nuke13–40.0922%10 Sept →
ancient13–30.0410%10 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0219%10 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0317%9 Sept →
office6–13-0.076%9 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0414%8 Sept →
nuke9–130.0522%8 Sept →
mirage13–90.1017%7 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0610%7 Sept →
ancient3–130.0125%5 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0717%5 Sept →
ancient8–130.0120%4 Sept →
mirage13–110.0022%4 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0028%4 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0421%4 Sept →
inferno15–150.0329%3 Sept →
ancient13–90.0219%3 Sept →
dust216–14-0.007%3 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0515%2 Sept →
anubis13–70.0260%2 Sept →
inferno13–100.0032%2 Sept →
anubis10–130.0328%2 Sept →
cache2–8-0.0436%2 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0122%2 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0112%1 Sept →
cache13–60.0032%1 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0920%31 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0117%31 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0322%31 Aug →
cache13–90.0323%31 Aug →
office13–80.0926%31 Aug →
nuke3–8-0.0012%31 Aug →
nuke6–130.0532%31 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0015%30 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0522%30 Aug →
inferno6–130.0225%30 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0218%29 Aug →
poseidon4–9-0.190%29 Aug →
cache13–50.0731%29 Aug →
cache13–80.0017%29 Aug →
ancient13–20.0341%29 Aug →
inferno16–120.0431%29 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0713%28 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.