iRaesk

iRaesk — CS2 Stats

VE76561198236173892[U:1:275908164]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,345Tracked matches63%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,952Hours in CS47Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,800Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40176 of 221126 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 10 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,800 +2,801 12 Aug16 Sept · 15 days played
19,99922,800peak 22,80012 Aug16 Sept
22,800Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-08-10

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,800
  • +1,528 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,200 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches4425+19
Win rate50%56%−6pp
K/D1.251.18+0.08
Headshot %52%51%+1pp

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate59.3%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy0.4%13.0%13.2%12.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.551.061.07above
Match win rate50.8%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGiRaeskFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,800 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning50
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY484111Last 10048%Win rateTWWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 875 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.0
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact9.2

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time594ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.35Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 28 Aug
42%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · dust2, 19 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 20 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
34In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C32141844%0.04
mirageB23111248%0.02
infernoB147750%0.02
vertigoC104640%0.04
cacheS86275%0.02
anubisD62433%-0.03
nuke32167%0.13
train21150%-0.01
ancient110100%0.09
office1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

73,291Lifetime kills
1.55K/D · Top 5% of Level 8 players
3,285Matches
50.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
59.3%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
0.4%Shot accuracy
7,987MVPs
1,075Hours (in match)
4,208Bombs planted
1,016Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,508
AWP4,925
MP91,645
MAC-101,632
MP71,153

Lifetime map wins

6,182inferno
5,071dust2
4,524vertigo
2,831nuke
162train
137office
59italy
8ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

188Matches
54%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
76.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25648%1.2717.5
Mirage4846%0.9913.8
Inferno3962%1.2515.6
Anubis2564%1.1814.8
Ancient771%1.0312.4
Cache475%1.8714.0
Vertigo425%1.2923.8
Nuke450%0.789.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
41.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
592msReaction time
37.7%T opening success
38.9%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
8.25HE damage / grenade
8.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.6627% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0011%16 Sept
inferno13–60.0216%16 Sept
vertigo13–50.0915%16 Sept
anubis0–13-0.0624%16 Sept
dust213–30.1013%15 Sept
mirage8–130.1225%14 Sept
cache13–11-0.0123%13 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0125%13 Sept
mirage13–50.1034%13 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0228%12 Sept
mirage11–9-0.0224%12 Sept
vertigo13–60.0322%12 Sept
mirage2–6-0.0523%12 Sept
dust25–13-0.0714%10 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0214%10 Sept
dust212–120.0834%9 Sept
vertigo12–12-0.0226%9 Sept
dust23–13-0.0927%9 Sept
dust213–90.0117%9 Sept
vertigo12–120.0731%9 Sept
inferno8–80.1023%9 Sept
cache13–20.0317%8 Sept
dust213–5-0.0221%8 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0112%7 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0321%7 Sept
cache3–13-0.0118%6 Sept
mirage13–80.0015%6 Sept
cache13–100.0419%6 Sept
mirage13–60.1227%6 Sept
dust212–120.0829%6 Sept
cache13–9-0.0617%6 Sept
cache7–13-0.0313%5 Sept
dust24–13-0.1021%5 Sept
dust213–70.1131%5 Sept
mirage13–00.0719%5 Sept
inferno11–130.0425%5 Sept
dust29–130.0627%4 Sept
dust213–70.0831%4 Sept
inferno4–9-0.0218%4 Sept
ancient13–90.0934%3 Sept
inferno11–130.0136%3 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0330%2 Sept
inferno13–50.0525%1 Sept
cache13–70.1420%1 Sept
mirage13–60.0222%1 Sept
mirage5–130.0119%30 Aug
mirage8–13-0.067%30 Aug
cache13–30.0419%30 Aug
mirage13–50.0122%30 Aug
dust21–13-0.0226%30 Aug
vertigo12–120.0638%30 Aug
vertigo9–6-0.0115%29 Aug
mirage11–130.0413%29 Aug
nuke9–00.3517%28 Aug
dust213–10.3330%28 Aug
inferno9–00.2819%27 Aug
dust213–50.0516%27 Aug
mirage13–30.1033%27 Aug
inferno9–20.176%26 Aug
dust210–130.1023%26 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0614%26 Aug
dust213–50.0433%26 Aug
inferno13–50.0413%25 Aug
mirage10–130.0218%24 Aug
dust29–130.0230%23 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0316%23 Aug
dust213–20.0214%23 Aug
mirage4–130.0134%23 Aug
inferno0–4-0.320%23 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0616%23 Aug
vertigo12–120.1824%23 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0316%23 Aug
vertigo13–20.1323%22 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0619%22 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0216%22 Aug
dust213–90.0021%20 Aug
dust26–130.0118%20 Aug
dust26–130.1928%20 Aug
dust213–11-0.0218%20 Aug
dust29–13-0.0229%19 Aug
dust211–13-0.0321%19 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0016%19 Aug
dust28–13-0.0042%19 Aug
mirage13–50.1225%18 Aug
anubis13–10.0313%18 Aug
mirage12–120.0222%16 Aug
dust26–130.0728%16 Aug
office7–13-0.0219%15 Aug
dust212–120.0315%15 Aug
train13–4-0.0021%15 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0423%14 Aug
nuke13–60.0822%13 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0228%13 Aug
dust213–90.0220%12 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0414%12 Aug
dust28–13-0.0331%11 Aug
dust28–130.0722%11 Aug
train2–13-0.0232%11 Aug
dust213–10.1140%11 Aug
dust29–20.035%10 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →