Dane

Dane — CS2 Stats

TW76561198232741468[U:1:272475740]Steam profile ↗

2,014Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,284 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDaneFACEITLevel 10 · 2,284 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning56
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51445Last 10051%Win rateWWTWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression5.4
Utility4.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.6
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time600ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy31.5%+4.8%
first ⅓ avg 26.7% → last ⅓ avg 31.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.50Best rating — nuke 9–0
132Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 20anubisWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2012860%0.03
ancientB168850%0.04
nukeB157847%0.03
dust2B136746%-0.02
anubisC94544%0.01
cacheB63350%0.03
overpassB63350%0.07
inferno43175%0.06
train31233%0.04
vertigo3030%-0.01
fachwerk110100%0.16
shelter1010%-0.05
sanctum110100%0.33
poseidon110100%0.18
cache_b110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,987Matches
52%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
86.4ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient38853%1.2418.8
Mirage26451%1.1617.6
Nuke23652%1.1817.9
Anubis19449%1.1117.3
Dust216746%1.1117.3
Train10758%1.2518.7
Overpass10759%1.1618.6
Inferno6638%1.0416.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.7%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
589msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
7.68HE damage / grenade
6.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4283 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.3076% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–6-0.0330%24 Aug
fachwerk13–90.1638%23 Aug
shelter12–12-0.0532%23 Aug
dust213–70.0127%6 Aug
cache13–20.0448%2 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0224%28 Jul
dust213–11-0.0216%27 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0125%24 Jul
dust213–60.1030%13 Jul
mirage13–80.1228%30 Jun
dust22–13-0.0926%28 Jun
dust26–13-0.0538%23 Jun
ancient11–130.0227%17 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0035%4 Jun
dust29–130.0121%4 Jun
nuke16–13-0.0428%3 Jun
nuke13–90.0124%15 May
cache13–9-0.0523%15 May
cache7–130.0634%14 May
nuke11–130.0035%13 May
mirage9–13-0.0241%7 May
cache12–120.0842%6 May
sanctum9–40.3326%6 May
poseidon9–30.1860%6 May
nuke13–16-0.0324%2 May
cache13–80.0429%29 Apr
cache0–13-0.0012%29 Apr
train13–50.1056%26 Apr
ancient17–190.0629%25 Apr
anubis13–100.1330%22 Apr
mirage13–110.0135%17 Apr
ancient9–130.0631%16 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0236%12 Apr
vertigo9–130.0434%8 Apr
dust213–11-0.0153%6 Apr
ancient13–100.0731%1 Apr
dust27–13-0.0511%26 Mar
ancient11–130.0835%20 Mar
mirage5–130.0528%20 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0828%19 Mar
inferno2–130.0234%19 Mar
inferno13–100.1255%14 Mar
overpass15–150.1038%14 Mar
ancient13–80.1134%14 Mar
nuke15–150.0227%14 Mar
anubis15–150.1430%13 Mar
mirage3–100.0224%13 Mar
ancient13–110.0832%13 Mar
nuke13–90.0441%2 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0330%1 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0023%28 Feb
anubis13–4-0.0232%28 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0229%27 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0136%26 Feb
ancient9–130.0220%25 Feb
mirage16–140.0031%15 Feb
mirage13–90.0324%31 Jan
mirage14–16-0.0517%30 Jan
ancient5–13-0.0517%30 Jan
ancient13–8-0.0717%30 Jan
overpass13–40.1119%26 Jan
dust219–17-0.0119%23 Jan
mirage13–80.0921%23 Jan
anubis13–9-0.0030%19 Jan
anubis13–160.0333%14 Jan
anubis7–13-0.0627%10 Jan
mirage13–70.1529%1 Jan
train8–130.0138%1 Jan
overpass13–100.1129%1 Jan
dust210–130.0221%28 Dec
inferno13–20.0815%19 Dec
mirage13–90.0720%16 Dec
mirage13–100.1329%15 Dec
nuke9–00.5030%15 Dec
vertigo11–130.0221%14 Dec
anubis8–130.0119%14 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0227%14 Dec
vertigo11–13-0.0838%14 Dec
anubis13–11-0.0119%14 Dec
cache_b13–30.0923%14 Dec
ancient13–50.0826%13 Dec
overpass13–20.0215%7 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0327%2 Dec
ancient7–130.0125%30 Nov
dust26–13-0.0714%28 Nov
dust216–14-0.0520%21 Nov
ancient13–70.0225%20 Nov
overpass9–130.0128%19 Nov
ancient13–110.1733%19 Nov
nuke3–130.0333%19 Nov
inferno13–30.0150%15 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0130%13 Nov
mirage6–00.1050%13 Nov
nuke13–80.0831%12 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0621%12 Nov
nuke0–13-0.0733%2 Nov
dust211–13-0.0121%31 Oct
mirage7–13-0.0318%23 Oct
train6–130.0126%22 Oct
overpass10–130.0826%21 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →