:(((

:((( — CS2 Stats

JP76561198218203545[U:1:257937817]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,015Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,313Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,010Top 50% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#70650 of 261685 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,447 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Nov 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,010 +3,331 26 Jun – 8 Nov · 23 days played
17,67923,231peak 23,23126 Jun8 Nov
23,231Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,447Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2026-02-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,447
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 84 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-27
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,221 below peak (23,231)
  • -2,105 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,574 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,990 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-27
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-27

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2——
Win rate50%——
K/D0.56——
Headshot %61%——

Measured 6 Nov 2026 → 15 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,631), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate42.4%43.8%44.8%2.4% short
Shot accuracy13.8%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.911.021.030.13 short
Match win rate41.9%44.7%45.2%3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG:(((FACEITLevel 5 · 1,447 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,010 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,447csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning48
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–52–6Last 10042%Win rateLLLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility3.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch3.4

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 54% on T to 24% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.8
Utility3.8
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time538ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+4.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–2 · nuke, 14 Sept →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · nuke, 22 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 1–5 · dust2, 28 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 29 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L6Current streak
7–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 15anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D225–1723%-0.02
infernoA169–756%-0.02
mirageC166–1038%-0.01
cacheA159–660%-0.01
ancientA74–357%-0.01
anubisD61–517%-0.03
nukeB63–350%-0.00
overpassC52–340%-0.05
vertigo—42–250%-0.00
office—11–0100%0.02
train—10–10%-0.01
stronghold—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,659Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
3,742Matches
41.9%Match win rate
42.4%Headshot %
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
8,311MVPs
1,356Hours (in match)
1,628Bombs planted
530Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,995dust2
3,662inferno
2,004nuke
1,384vertigo
1,234train
622cbble
208office
173lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

695Matches
50%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
70.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis8851%0.8213.2
Inferno7953%0.8413.5
Mirage7454%0.8413.0
Dust26645%0.7912.4
Nuke5654%0.8112.9
Ancient5555%0.8214.1
Train1553%0.9915.6
Vertigo1553%0.7612.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
69.0%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
548msReaction time
54.2%T opening success
24.4%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
4.82HE damage / grenade
6.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 24.4462% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.0524%8 Nov →
inferno4–13-0.0518%4 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.058%3 Nov →
anubis5–13-0.068%29 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0520%25 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0710%25 Oct →
dust213–40.0221%25 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0712%25 Oct →
dust21–9-0.0240%12 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0427%11 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0528%8 Oct →
mirage13–90.0114%3 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0423%1 Oct →
dust21–50.0133%28 Sept →
inferno10–6-0.0117%28 Sept →
ancient13–100.0217%27 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0421%25 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0417%19 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0715%18 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0325%18 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0011%17 Sept →
anubis7–130.0123%17 Sept →
ancient13–70.0414%17 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0333%15 Sept →
nuke9–20.1926%14 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0448%14 Sept →
dust21–13-0.1213%23 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0317%23 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0356%22 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0121%22 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0710%16 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0520%16 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0511%8 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0612%4 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0315%4 Aug →
anubis10–130.0119%26 Jul →
ancient9–130.0029%21 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0522%12 Jul →
anubis16–14-0.0514%12 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0810%11 Jul →
dust213–50.0636%10 Jul →
inferno13–50.0226%10 Jul →
inferno13–90.0424%10 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.059%9 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0320%9 Jul →
cache13–20.0529%9 Jul →
dust213–3-0.0235%6 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0725%6 Jul →
overpass4–13-0.140%3 Jul →
overpass1–4-0.080%1 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0510%27 Jun →
inferno13–90.0119%27 Jun →
dust215–15-0.0122%26 Jun →
mirage13–90.0524%26 Jun →
dust21–130.0636%24 Jun →
mirage13–40.1414%24 Jun →
overpass13–6-0.0223%23 Jun →
inferno13–70.0828%23 Jun →
mirage13–60.0224%22 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0124%19 Jun →
ancient13–40.0338%19 Jun →
inferno15–15-0.0423%19 Jun →
dust210–130.0017%19 Jun →
overpass8–130.0223%4 Jun →
office13–40.0245%25 May →
mirage2–13-0.0323%25 May →
dust23–13-0.0924%14 May →
cache13–110.0724%10 May →
cache12–120.0221%10 May →
cache13–7-0.0914%1 May →
cache4–130.0214%1 May →
cache13–8-0.0114%1 May →
cache13–11-0.0419%29 Apr →
cache13–10.0417%29 Apr →
cache12–120.1020%29 Apr →
cache6–13-0.0320%29 Apr →
dust212–120.0218%19 Apr →
vertigo11–13-0.0225%19 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0313%18 Apr →
dust210–130.0815%18 Apr →
vertigo7–130.0247%11 Apr →
train10–13-0.0112%11 Apr →
stronghold12–120.0316%11 Apr →
vertigo13–9-0.0314%11 Apr →
dust28–30.0313%11 Apr →
vertigo13–70.0212%10 Apr →
inferno9–7-0.0716%10 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0518%31 Mar →
dust22–13-0.1227%27 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0535%26 Mar →
mirage13–60.0516%21 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0713%12 Mar →
dust28–13-0.059%5 Mar →
inferno16–14-0.0715%3 Mar →
dust213–6-0.0115%3 Mar →
ancient22–19-0.0118%20 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.050%20 Feb →
overpass13–9-0.0110%17 Feb →
inferno4–130.019%15 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0413%15 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.