Cr4wl3r

Cr4wl3r — CS2 Stats

76561198216705861[U:1:256440133]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,185Tracked matches63%Win rate2025Tracked since
2,118Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating12,658Blue band · top ~40.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 663 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,658 +1,300 3 Aug – 31 Oct · 27 days played
10,00013,502peak 13,5023 Aug31 Oct
Faceit ELO: 663 +0 2 Sept – 4 Sept · 2 observations
663663peak 6632 Sept4 Sept
13,502Peak Premier in tracked matches
663Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-08-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 663
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 88 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 844 below peak (13,502)
  • +973 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,300 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,342 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate63.1%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.211.021.03above
Match win rate42.4%44.7%45.2%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCr4wl3rFACEITLevel 5 · 663 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,658 · Blue bandPEAK ELO663csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning51
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–39–4Last 10057%Win rateWLWWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.1
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact9.4

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time593ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy13.3%−5.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 22 Oct →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · inferno, 25 Aug →
453msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · dust2, 11 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 30 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
12–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 48% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB2512–1348%0.01
ancientA2213–959%-0.01
dust2A148–657%-0.01
nukeB137–654%-0.02
mirageA117–464%-0.01
cacheS64–267%0.01
infernoA53–260%-0.02
train—43–175%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

49,115Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
1,786Matches
42.4%Match win rate
63.1%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,805MVPs
2,118Hours (in match)
2,239Bombs planted
483Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,808dust2
3,663inferno
2,235nuke
368train
106office
101vertigo
7ar_shoots
3ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

410Matches
50%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
73.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust211347%0.8813.3
Inferno9052%1.0114.9
Anubis7359%0.9914.2
Nuke5254%1.0415.3
Ancient4840%0.7813.0
Mirage2454%0.7811.4
Overpass633%0.7111.5
Cache333%0.549.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
591msReaction time
43.7%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
7.34HE damage / grenade
9.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.5445% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.5291% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–5-0.014%31 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0614%31 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0416%31 Oct →
ancient13–10.0715%31 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0410%30 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0121%30 Oct →
anubis7–130.0010%30 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0613%30 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0816%29 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0213%29 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0720%28 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.065%28 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.039%28 Oct →
anubis13–40.0432%28 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0012%26 Oct →
ancient13–30.067%26 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.1113%26 Oct →
anubis6–130.0110%25 Oct →
anubis9–130.0114%23 Oct →
mirage13–60.029%23 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0114%23 Oct →
dust213–110.0726%23 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0218%23 Oct →
ancient13–50.1514%22 Oct →
anubis13–50.146%22 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0112%22 Oct →
ancient13–100.0313%22 Oct →
mirage13–20.016%22 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0219%22 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0413%22 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.0210%21 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.039%19 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0514%19 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0810%19 Oct →
dust27–130.0223%19 Oct →
dust213–90.0137%18 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0817%18 Oct →
anubis12–12-0.0319%16 Oct →
ancient5–3-0.0520%16 Oct →
dust213–50.0417%15 Oct →
mirage16–120.0315%15 Oct →
anubis13–10.1129%14 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0020%14 Oct →
train13–90.0318%13 Oct →
train13–100.0614%13 Oct →
ancient13–40.1215%29 Sept →
anubis9–130.0122%23 Sept →
anubis13–80.0717%22 Sept →
anubis7–130.0124%18 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0517%14 Sept →
anubis13–70.0422%14 Sept →
anubis13–110.0410%13 Sept →
cache13–100.1019%8 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0318%8 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0218%6 Sept →
mirage6–130.0216%6 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0130%4 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0713%3 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0413%3 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0712%3 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0215%2 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0533%1 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0611%1 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0223%1 Sept →
anubis13–90.0112%31 Aug →
ancient13–70.0622%31 Aug →
cache13–50.0010%31 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0110%31 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0519%31 Aug →
dust213–40.0617%31 Aug →
inferno7–130.0216%30 Aug →
dust213–0-0.029%30 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.096%30 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0221%28 Aug →
cache13–50.0410%28 Aug →
anubis13–60.0635%25 Aug →
dust22–13-0.1233%25 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0028%25 Aug →
inferno7–130.0038%25 Aug →
anubis9–130.0117%25 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0124%25 Aug →
anubis12–12-0.0917%25 Aug →
mirage5–0-0.0015%25 Aug →
anubis13–30.0229%14 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0414%13 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0610%13 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0810%12 Aug →
train12–120.0725%12 Aug →
train13–3-0.0321%12 Aug →
dust213–11-0.064%11 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0617%11 Aug →
nuke13–40.0817%11 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0615%10 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0517%6 Aug →
ancient13–40.0716%6 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0413%5 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0313%4 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0223%4 Aug →
dust213–40.0923%4 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0020%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.