Machinix

Machinix — CS2 Stats

76561198215372269[U:1:255106541]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,487Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,198Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,487Purple band · top ~26.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,315 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−29Premier CS Rating · 15,516 → 15,487
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 17 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,487 -1,588 17 Apr17 Sept · 44 days played
12,74118,138peak 18,13817 Apr17 Sept
18,341Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,315Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
56Days played since 2026-04-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,315
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 36 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,651 below peak (18,138)
  • +23 over 30 days · steady
  • +487 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,513 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate41.8%42.7%43.8%2.0% short
Shot accuracy12.5%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.010.991.02meets
Match win rate44.7%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMachinixFACEITLevel 4 · 1,315 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,487 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,315csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning44
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46522Last 10046%Win rateLWWLWTLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · −64ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility5.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 647ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning4.4
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time641ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 641ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 25 Apr
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 30 May
438msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · nuke, 26 Jun
13–0Biggest win · vertigo, 6 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 11dust2Weakest map · 39% over 31
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C31121939%0.01
mirageB23111248%-0.01
infernoB168850%-0.01
nukeA116555%-0.03
ancientC73443%0.02
anubis4040%-0.00
cache42250%-0.01
train330100%-0.05
vertigo110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

158,648Lifetime kills
1.01K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
8,565Matches
44.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
41.8%Headshot %
12.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
17,911MVPs
3,623Hours (in match)
11,053Bombs planted
1,895Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4746,007
AWP27,190
AUG8,794
SG 5534,737
MAC-103,379
MP92,999

Lifetime map wins

31,527dust2
16,026inferno
3,635nuke
1,869vertigo
1,190train
79office
48cbble
29lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

589Matches
48%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
83.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust214546%1.2717.8
Mirage10241%1.1216.4
Inferno10054%1.1917.0
Anubis7655%1.2216.3
Ancient6946%1.1917.6
Nuke4547%1.2015.9
Train1856%1.3718.7
Vertigo1436%1.1417.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
29.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.3%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
647msReaction time
44.0%T opening success
32.8%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
10.27HE damage / grenade
8.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4477 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.8094% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 31 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient3–130.0820%17 Sept
inferno13–90.0531%17 Sept
nuke16–120.0021%11 Sept
mirage0–13-0.0922%9 Sept
ancient16–13-0.0118%4 Sept
anubis15–150.0325%3 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0024%1 Sept
cache5–13-0.0824%26 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0830%26 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0423%26 Aug
dust26–130.0033%20 Aug
train13–6-0.0412%12 Aug
train13–11-0.0214%12 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0524%12 Aug
dust213–2-0.0211%12 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0738%12 Aug
mirage13–50.0119%5 Aug
dust213–11-0.0519%5 Aug
mirage8–130.0518%5 Aug
inferno13–80.0021%1 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0333%29 Jul
ancient9–130.0025%28 Jul
ancient2–130.0015%27 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0221%25 Jul
inferno13–100.0215%21 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0620%21 Jul
cache13–60.0636%20 Jul
mirage13–50.0116%20 Jul
dust28–130.0128%13 Jul
ancient13–100.0619%3 Jul
cache5–13-0.0915%2 Jul
dust20–13-0.020%2 Jul
dust213–2-0.0110%2 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0220%2 Jul
dust26–130.1015%1 Jul
inferno3–13-0.057%1 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0023%28 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0327%26 Jun
dust213–10.0324%26 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0525%26 Jun
mirage3–4-0.0522%21 Jun
inferno13–90.0214%20 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0220%20 Jun
train13–5-0.086%18 Jun
dust22–13-0.0129%18 Jun
mirage0–13-0.030%18 Jun
dust213–20.0116%14 Jun
vertigo13–00.0926%6 Jun
dust27–13-0.0146%6 Jun
mirage13–20.0336%3 Jun
dust24–13-0.050%30 May
nuke3–13-0.1050%30 May
dust213–8-0.0127%30 May
dust210–130.0123%30 May
mirage1–50.0727%30 May
anubis15–15-0.0111%27 May
nuke13–10-0.073%26 May
dust213–11-0.0233%23 May
mirage13–110.037%23 May
dust29–13-0.0317%21 May
mirage2–6-0.0027%19 May
inferno13–8-0.0417%19 May
dust21–13-0.0332%19 May
dust21–130.0227%19 May
dust210–13-0.0429%17 May
dust23–13-0.0613%16 May
inferno10–2-0.046%16 May
ancient7–13-0.0317%15 May
nuke13–70.019%10 May
anubis11–13-0.0311%10 May
mirage13–60.0210%9 May
dust23–13-0.0018%7 May
mirage2–13-0.0713%6 May
mirage13–40.1424%5 May
inferno2–13-0.0622%5 May
dust213–70.0527%5 May
mirage14–16-0.0721%4 May
mirage13–6-0.0412%2 May
cache13–90.0523%2 May
dust25–13-0.0614%2 May
nuke13–60.0118%2 May
inferno13–80.0817%1 May
dust213–80.1024%1 May
dust213–20.0513%1 May
mirage13–70.0616%1 May
inferno11–13-0.0516%29 Apr
dust213–160.0332%27 Apr
dust28–130.0330%26 Apr
ancient13–100.0116%25 Apr
dust213–20.1827%25 Apr
dust213–90.0624%23 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0017%22 Apr
nuke13–5-0.058%20 Apr
dust211–13-0.0213%19 Apr
dust24–13-0.0616%19 Apr
nuke11–130.0436%18 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0011%18 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0030%18 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0814%18 Apr
mirage13–80.0127%17 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →