JtVS — CS2 Stats

FI76561198213508789[U:1:253243061]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,176Tracked matches55%Win rate2024Tracked since

1,774Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,302Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11503 of 57085 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,717 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,302 +0 28 Aug – 30 Aug · 2 observations

Faceit ELO: 1,717 +0 28 Aug – 30 Aug · 2 observations

23,302Peak Premier on CSDB

1,717Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

2Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,717
Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 34 to go
Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 23,302
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,698 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=7,415), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	58.8%	51.7%
Shot accuracy	0.2%	13.8%
Kill/death ratio	1.67	1.09
Match win rate	50.8%	48.7%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning50

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateWLWWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5

Aggression5.4

Utility6.2

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels0.6

Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning5.0

Utility6.2

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels0.6

Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time575ms−48ms

first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms

Headshot accuracy18.5%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–5

13–1Biggest win — inferno

4Longest win streak

4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 86% over 7dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	20	10–10	50%	0.02
inferno	A	19	12–7	63%	0.01
anubis	B	18	9–9	50%	0.00
cache	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.01
ancient	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.01
mirage	S	7	6–1	86%	-0.01
dust2	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.01
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.02
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

83,635Lifetime kills

1.67K/D · Top 5% of Level 10 players

2,382Matches

50.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players

58.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players

0.2%Shot accuracy

4,957MVPs

1,694Hours (in match)

2,374Bombs planted

917Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,867

AWP7,191

P2000 / USP-S6,663

M4A4 / M4A1-S5,854

Desert Eagle4,475

Glock-182,534

MP92,508

FAMAS2,286

MAC-101,784

Galil AR1,524

Lifetime map wins

3,907nuke

3,454inferno

2,809dust2

1,097train

949vertigo

98office

26italy

17ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

225Matches

58%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

79.4ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	49	55%	1.15	17.1
Nuke	39	67%	1.26	17.5
Inferno	35	66%	1.11	15.7
Mirage	28	46%	1.09	14.7
Anubis	27	56%	1.01	16.0
Dust2	23	57%	1.01	14.2
Cache	10	50%	1.21	15.2
Overpass	8	62%	0.90	14.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy

36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.2%Spray accuracy

83.7%Counter-strafing

11.2°Preaim

559msReaction time

31.9%T opening success

33.3%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

8.1%Flash assists

10.12HE damage / grenade

8.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.8976% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–1	0.04	25%	28 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	18%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.03	29%	27 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.01	21%	26 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	14%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.09	30%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	25%	19 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.01	11%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.05	21%	19 Aug →
vertigo	1–6	-0.04	6%	19 Aug →
inferno	3–13	0.03	26%	19 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	16%	18 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.03	15%	18 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	13%	17 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.04	37%	17 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.01	14%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	16%	16 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	15%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.13	22%	15 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.00	11%	15 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	10%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	8%	15 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	35%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.02	24%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.06	11%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	24%	13 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.00	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	17%	13 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	13%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.02	20%	12 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	16%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	21%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.01	14%	11 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.02	18%	10 Aug →
nuke	3–10	-0.05	22%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	24%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.00	21%	10 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	22%	10 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.08	14%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	19%	8 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	23%	7 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.09	10%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	26%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.14	22%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.02	11%	7 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	14%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.03	14%	6 Aug →
cache	0–13	-0.04	17%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	18%	6 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	18%	6 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	14%	6 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	20%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	15%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.06	10%	5 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.02	8%	4 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	16%	3 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	4%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.10	29%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.07	15%	28 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	16%	28 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	15%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	37%	28 Jul →
ancient	12–16	0.02	17%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.05	22%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.01	15%	28 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.06	7%	27 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	16%	27 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.00	14%	26 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.02	23%	26 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.12	0%	26 Jul →
train	7–13	-0.06	18%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.04	18%	25 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.01	21%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.05	20%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.08	11%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.07	5%	25 Jul →
anubis	9–1	-0.04	0%	25 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	8%	24 Jul →
nuke	2–6	-0.00	36%	24 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	5%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.08	18%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	14%	23 Jul →
cache	14–16	0.00	25%	22 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.00	23%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	20%	22 Jul →
nuke	3–5	0.09	21%	22 Jul →
nuke	5–1	0.14	33%	22 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	19%	21 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.02	20%	21 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.07	35%	21 Jul →
ancient	16–13	-0.04	19%	20 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	19%	20 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	29%	15 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.08	41%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.07	25%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	12%	15 Jul →
cache	16–12	-0.02	16%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.08	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	22%	14 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	12%	14 Jul →