PolishEagle — CS2 Stats

76561198211567141[U:1:251301413]

1,650Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,209Purple band · top ~11.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21212 of 49066 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,731 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

19,310Peak Premier on CSDB
1,731Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,731
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 20 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 101 below peak (19,310)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 791 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPolishEagleFACEITLevel 8 · 1,731 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,209 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,731csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning49
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54451Last 10054%Win rateLLWLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression5.2
Utility4.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.9
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time525ms−91ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — inferno 9–5
130Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS29191066%-0.02
dust2C26101638%-0.02
ancientA116555%-0.02
anubisA116555%-0.02
cacheS118373%0.02
infernoC114736%-0.01
nuke110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

985Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
80.9ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26655%1.0917.1
Anubis11347%1.0616.9
Ancient10855%1.0116.5
Inferno9342%0.9014.4
Dust27541%0.9215.3
Vertigo6149%1.1817.0
Nuke3850%1.0116.4
Overpass1638%1.0614.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
533msReaction time
25.8%T opening success
49.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
9.51HE damage / grenade
5.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.8021% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0227%29 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0529%29 Aug
ancient13–90.0527%29 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0123%28 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0513%28 Aug
dust213–10-0.0850%28 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0217%28 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0625%27 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0517%25 Aug
dust213–6-0.0713%25 Aug
mirage13–20.0323%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.0533%24 Aug
cache13–110.0820%21 Aug
anubis13–70.0214%21 Aug
dust213–7-0.0217%21 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0418%21 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0318%21 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0218%21 Aug
mirage1–4-0.0329%21 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0020%18 Aug
cache13–11-0.0213%18 Aug
ancient13–00.0324%17 Aug
mirage13–100.0322%17 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0422%17 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0818%17 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0617%17 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0721%16 Aug
ancient13–160.0036%13 Aug
inferno6–1-0.140%13 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0419%13 Aug
dust211–13-0.0122%12 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0635%12 Aug
cache3–13-0.0336%12 Aug
dust213–70.0520%11 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0225%11 Aug
cache10–13-0.0120%10 Aug
dust213–20.0319%10 Aug
inferno5–13-0.053%10 Aug
mirage13–50.0618%10 Aug
anubis0–13-0.0825%9 Aug
cache13–100.1036%9 Aug
mirage13–80.0315%7 Aug
dust216–140.0312%7 Aug
dust24–13-0.0422%6 Aug
anubis8–130.0634%6 Aug
mirage16–120.0527%6 Aug
cache13–10-0.0117%5 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0623%5 Aug
dust211–130.0317%5 Aug
dust213–11-0.0219%5 Aug
anubis7–20.0178%5 Aug
mirage13–20.1024%5 Aug
dust213–40.0223%5 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0713%5 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0318%5 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0619%4 Aug
mirage13–70.0220%2 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0521%30 Jul
mirage9–2-0.087%30 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0230%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0229%29 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0319%28 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0831%28 Jul
mirage13–90.0023%28 Jul
dust211–13-0.0630%28 Jul
inferno13–50.0311%27 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0127%27 Jul
dust211–13-0.0618%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0529%26 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0516%26 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0127%25 Jul
dust24–13-0.0717%25 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0714%19 Jul
dust210–13-0.0523%19 Jul
cache13–11-0.0514%18 Jul
inferno9–50.2528%18 Jul
cache13–80.0727%18 Jul
dust26–13-0.0219%12 Jul
inferno13–100.1115%11 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0420%11 Jul
dust213–10-0.0239%10 Jul
cache13–8-0.0020%9 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0214%7 Jul
dust213–8-0.0719%7 Jul
cache13–30.0515%7 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0721%5 Jul
dust214–16-0.0930%5 Jul
mirage13–100.0425%27 Jun
dust28–130.0115%25 Jun
dust215–150.0115%24 Jun
cache4–130.0328%24 Jun
dust211–13-0.0314%22 Jun
dust28–13-0.0119%19 Jun
dust25–13-0.0019%19 Jun
mirage5–13-0.1118%19 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0520%17 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0426%15 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0339%15 Jun
dust21–130.0024%15 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0525%14 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →