xlFezZ

xlFezZ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198209224877[U:1:248959149]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,625Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,748Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating14,724Blue band · top ~29.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,724 -395 1 Sept – 29 Oct · 19 days played
13,29115,119peak 15,1191 Sept29 Oct
15,177Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 395 below peak (15,119)
  • +159 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 276 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate52.2%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy2.9%11.2%12.0%9.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.970.991.020.05 short
Match win rate40.2%43.9%44.7%4.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxlFezZFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,724 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning46
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateLLWWLWTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 667ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.2 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch10.0

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.6
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time644ms+54ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 14–16 · mirage, 9 Oct →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 29 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 20 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 21 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 16mirageWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C229–1341%-0.03
cacheA1610–663%-0.02
ancientC156–940%-0.02
mirageD133–1023%-0.02
infernoA138–562%-0.01
anubisB126–650%-0.03
nukeC83–538%-0.05
vertigo—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,410Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
4,005Matches
40.2%Match win rate
52.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
2.9%Shot accuracy
6,744MVPs
1,658Hours (in match)
2,646Bombs planted
515Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

9,683dust2
8,355inferno
3,144nuke
1,404vertigo
185train
61cbble
44ar_shoots
38lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

23Matches
48%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
71.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

80%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2757%0.8411.3
Mirage743%0.9514.9
Anubis450%0.7913.8
Cache2100%0.909.0
Inferno10%0.7311.0
Nuke10%0.8713.0
Ancient10%0.6111.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
638msReaction time
39.6%T opening success
44.9%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
8.09HE damage / grenade
8.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6006% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–130.0024%29 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0718%29 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.064%29 Oct →
inferno16–12-0.0411%29 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.127%29 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0118%28 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0737%28 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0438%22 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0214%22 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0723%21 Oct →
inferno13–40.0315%21 Oct →
anubis6–130.0015%21 Oct →
cache13–10.0929%21 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0315%20 Oct →
cache13–2-0.0213%20 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0326%20 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0721%20 Oct →
dust213–80.0224%20 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0024%20 Oct →
ancient13–70.0422%20 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0430%20 Oct →
cache13–60.0112%20 Oct →
ancient13–90.0220%20 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0519%20 Oct →
mirage13–20.0929%20 Oct →
inferno13–50.0617%20 Oct →
ancient11–130.0415%19 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.068%19 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.067%19 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0211%19 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.075%19 Oct →
inferno10–130.013%19 Oct →
vertigo6–13-0.016%17 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0914%16 Oct →
cache13–1-0.073%16 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0413%16 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0532%16 Oct →
dust23–13-0.1217%16 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0730%16 Oct →
anubis13–60.0111%15 Oct →
cache13–50.0122%15 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0818%15 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0312%15 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0412%15 Oct →
cache4–130.0315%15 Oct →
cache2–13-0.1213%14 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0327%14 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0116%14 Oct →
dust25–13-0.018%14 Oct →
inferno10–00.088%10 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0213%9 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.1111%9 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0631%9 Oct →
dust213–20.0320%9 Oct →
mirage14–160.1224%9 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0515%8 Oct →
cache13–20.0117%8 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.046%8 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0317%8 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0323%7 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.057%7 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0010%7 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0317%7 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0715%6 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0619%6 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.075%5 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.096%5 Oct →
cache8–13-0.039%5 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0313%5 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.090%5 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.018%5 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0010%4 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0713%1 Oct →
ancient8–130.0019%30 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0416%29 Sept →
inferno13–70.0017%29 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0717%29 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0021%29 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0045%29 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0912%29 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0014%28 Sept →
nuke13–70.0712%28 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0716%28 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0314%28 Sept →
inferno9–130.028%28 Sept →
dust213–40.0223%26 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0120%26 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0317%26 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0218%26 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0113%26 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.076%25 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0812%25 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0518%25 Sept →
inferno13–60.0515%25 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.018%24 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0423%24 Sept →
dust211–130.0515%23 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0225%23 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0126%23 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0310%22 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.