VilenasFPV

VilenasFPV — CS2 Stats

LV76561198207898623[U:1:247632895]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,154Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,817Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,674Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#73735 of 258979 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,674 +5,568 23 Jul – 28 Oct · 22 days played
15,10621,628peak 21,62823 Jul28 Oct
21,763Peak Premier in tracked matches
25Days played since 2026-07-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 954 below peak (21,628)
  • -131 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,673 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,326 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate49.9%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy6.3%12.2%11.2%5.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.130.980.99above
Match win rate48.4%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVilenasFPVFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER20,674 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning54
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateWLWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility5.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 51% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time585ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 665ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 2–9 · mirage, 23 Jul →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 24 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 2 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 27 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
4–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 68% over 25mirageWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2517–868%0.02
ancientB168–850%0.02
infernoB158–753%0.02
anubisB147–750%0.00
nukeA106–460%0.00
cacheB105–550%0.02
mirageC104–640%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,684Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
3,548Matches
48.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
49.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
6.3%Shot accuracy
9,452MVPs
1,475Hours (in match)
3,496Bombs planted
721Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,078
AWP10,343
FAMAS1,680
MAC-101,485
MP9951

Lifetime map wins

6,187dust2
4,960inferno
3,036nuke
2,210vertigo
848train
139office
72cbble
26lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

212Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
—ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
584msReaction time
50.6%T opening success
32.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
11.70HE damage / grenade
10.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.3798% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–130.0015%28 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0710%28 Oct →
dust213–80.0329%28 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0018%28 Oct →
dust211–130.0017%28 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0011%27 Oct →
ancient4–130.0719%14 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.1113%14 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0615%24 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0218%24 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0219%24 Sept →
dust213–90.0719%21 Sept →
dust213–50.0033%21 Sept →
nuke13–30.0530%21 Sept →
cache10–13-0.088%21 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0017%21 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0227%27 Aug →
dust26–130.010%26 Aug →
anubis3–0-0.050%26 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0311%26 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.064%26 Aug →
cache13–80.0019%26 Aug →
ancient9–130.0019%26 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0718%10 Aug →
dust26–130.1025%10 Aug →
ancient13–30.0431%9 Aug →
inferno13–50.0615%9 Aug →
anubis13–90.0012%9 Aug →
ancient4–80.0017%9 Aug →
ancient13–50.0213%7 Aug →
mirage13–70.0021%7 Aug →
nuke13–70.0227%7 Aug →
inferno11–130.0726%7 Aug →
cache11–130.0213%7 Aug →
dust216–140.0621%7 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0023%7 Aug →
inferno13–90.0517%5 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0531%4 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0419%4 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0615%4 Aug →
anubis15–150.0319%4 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0316%4 Aug →
cache13–160.0720%3 Aug →
ancient13–100.0523%2 Aug →
ancient13–100.0826%2 Aug →
inferno8–130.1120%2 Aug →
anubis11–130.1022%2 Aug →
cache13–100.0323%1 Aug →
dust213–110.0114%1 Aug →
cache11–130.0125%1 Aug →
ancient13–50.0713%1 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0320%1 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0315%1 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0213%31 Jul →
mirage13–80.0220%30 Jul →
mirage13–110.0021%29 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0710%28 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0631%28 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0326%28 Jul →
nuke15–150.1119%28 Jul →
inferno8–130.0416%28 Jul →
cache13–40.0715%27 Jul →
dust213–20.1026%27 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0016%27 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0711%27 Jul →
dust213–4-0.016%24 Jul →
cache11–130.0726%24 Jul →
ancient13–90.0725%24 Jul →
nuke13–50.0324%24 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0424%24 Jul →
dust213–80.019%24 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0213%24 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0326%24 Jul →
ancient13–50.1325%24 Jul →
inferno13–70.0113%24 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0141%24 Jul →
ancient10–130.0419%24 Jul →
dust216–120.0715%24 Jul →
dust28–130.0422%24 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0616%24 Jul →
dust213–60.0522%23 Jul →
mirage2–90.1326%23 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0020%23 Jul →
dust213–90.0423%23 Jul →
dust213–90.0614%23 Jul →
anubis13–40.1321%23 Jul →
anubis13–90.0822%22 Jul →
dust213–50.0615%22 Jul →
anubis13–60.0731%22 Jul →
inferno13–20.0430%22 Jul →
dust26–130.0116%22 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.007%22 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0519%22 Jul →
inferno10–130.0133%22 Jul →
cache13–3-0.0126%22 Jul →
inferno15–150.0933%22 Jul →
mirage13–50.0819%22 Jul →
mirage11–130.0415%22 Jul →
anubis11–130.014%21 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0812%20 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.