rootsi kunn

rootsi kunn — CS2 Stats

EE76561198206972084[U:1:246706356]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

140Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
359Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,582 -4,002 11 Jun – 28 Mar · 15 days played
6,99114,584peak 14,58411 Jun28 Mar
14,584Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2025-04-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,259), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate32.2%41.8%42.7%10.5% short
Shot accuracy16.1%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.670.980.990.33 short
Match win rate31.8%43.3%43.9%12.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrootsi kunnFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning28
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateWWWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility2.3
Positioning2.8
Opening Duels0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning2.8
Utility2.3
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact7.4

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time609ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy8.6%−3.9%
first ⅓ avg 12.5% → last ⅓ avg 8.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 17 Apr →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 17 Apr →
461msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 10 Jun →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 17 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 58% over 31ancientWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3118–1358%-0.04
infernoB178–947%-0.05
anubisB168–850%-0.04
ancientD133–1023%-0.07
dust2B137–654%-0.06
overpass—41–325%-0.07
nuke—30–30%-0.07
cache—22–0100%-0.02
train—10–10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

8,154Lifetime kills
0.67K/D
696Matches
31.8%Match win rate
32.2%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
767MVPs
202Hours (in match)
521Bombs planted
56Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

534inferno
353dust2
324vertigo
167train
88nuke
67office
38lake
18safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
0%Win rate
0.31Avg K/D
—ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.1%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
69.8%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
614msReaction time
15.1%T opening success
20.0%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
4.37HE damage / grenade
3.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.1496% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.266 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.0538% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–5-0.007%21 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0613%21 Oct →
mirage13–70.0211%20 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0814%19 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.053%19 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0612%19 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.032%18 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.143%18 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0810%15 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0011%15 Oct →
inferno16–12-0.097%15 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.096%14 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.099%14 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0314%14 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0610%14 Oct →
dust26–13-0.088%14 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.094%28 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0217%28 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.054%28 Mar →
ancient15–15-0.052%5 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0019%5 Mar →
dust24–13-0.083%25 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.006%25 Feb →
anubis13–90.0411%22 Feb →
dust213–7-0.0610%22 Feb →
anubis13–4-0.130%18 Feb →
dust213–100.0026%18 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0616%18 Feb →
dust213–10-0.053%17 Feb →
anubis13–1-0.036%17 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.022%16 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.058%16 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.034%16 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.065%15 Feb →
mirage13–4-0.0725%15 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.072%15 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.052%15 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.0412%13 Feb →
overpass11–13-0.0312%13 Feb →
dust213–9-0.084%13 Feb →
inferno16–14-0.062%13 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0613%13 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0410%11 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.088%11 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0613%11 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.033%11 Feb →
overpass13–10-0.0813%11 Feb →
inferno4–13-0.0417%11 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0415%10 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0416%10 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.047%3 Feb →
mirage13–90.0016%2 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.109%2 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.069%2 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.077%2 Feb →
dust216–14-0.0412%2 Feb →
ancient15–15-0.084%1 Feb →
anubis13–20.0413%1 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.100%1 Feb →
dust213–8-0.110%1 Feb →
dust213–16-0.0821%1 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0515%1 Feb →
inferno13–8-0.020%1 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.076%1 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.1019%1 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0819%1 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0714%31 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.049%31 Jan →
mirage8–13-0.0523%31 Jan →
anubis13–100.0311%31 Jan →
inferno13–16-0.056%31 Jan →
ancient7–13-0.0517%26 Jan →
mirage16–13-0.0616%26 Jan →
mirage13–7-0.094%25 Jan →
anubis13–16-0.087%25 Jan →
dust22–13-0.0717%25 Jan →
overpass3–13-0.0717%25 Jan →
dust211–13-0.0411%25 Jan →
mirage11–13-0.0817%25 Jan →
mirage13–11-0.063%25 Jan →
inferno5–13-0.0617%25 Jan →
mirage1–13-0.1017%28 Dec →
overpass2–13-0.095%28 Dec →
inferno10–13-0.078%28 Dec →
mirage1–13-0.050%28 Dec →
inferno5–13-0.0410%27 Dec →
nuke4–13-0.093%27 Dec →
ancient13–5-0.0610%11 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0110%10 Jun →
anubis13–70.0410%10 Jun →
mirage12–16-0.0315%27 May →
anubis5–13-0.059%4 May →
inferno13–90.0311%4 May →
mirage13–40.1122%4 May →
dust215–150.0514%4 May →
mirage13–40.0514%4 May →
mirage14–16-0.0227%17 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.058%17 Apr →
mirage13–20.1236%17 Apr →
train10–130.0010%11 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.