Clanker

Clanker — CS2 Stats

76561198206045671[U:1:245779943]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,968Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,011Top 25% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41911 of 252578 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,711 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,011 +1,368 11 Sept – 13 Oct · 8 days played
21,64323,011peak 23,01111 Sept13 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,711 +0 29 Aug – 5 Oct · 2 observations
1,7111,711peak 1,71129 Aug5 Oct
23,011Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,711Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-07-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,711
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 40 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,011
  • +1,368 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,989 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-10-05
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGClankerFACEITLevel 9 · 1,711 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,011 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,711csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning57
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–52Last 10048%Win rateWWWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.5
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.7
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time595ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 4 Oct →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 3 Aug →
430msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · mirage, 19 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
11–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 59% over 17nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2715–1256%-0.01
dust2C207–1335%-0.01
anubisC198–1142%-0.00
ancientA1710–759%0.00
cacheA95–456%0.00
nukeD62–433%0.01
inferno—21–150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,529Matches
50%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
74.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage46148%0.9614.9
Dust229049%0.9814.6
Ancient28652%1.0414.8
Anubis18248%1.0414.9
Nuke12857%1.0414.9
Inferno7947%0.9014.8
Train5459%1.0715.4
Overpass3438%0.9015.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
600msReaction time
53.9%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
10.54HE damage / grenade
12.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0418%16 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0144%16 Oct →
nuke13–100.0017%13 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0025%13 Oct →
mirage13–90.0022%12 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0124%8 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0416%8 Oct →
dust215–19-0.0114%7 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0217%7 Oct →
mirage13–70.0418%6 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.089%5 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0428%5 Oct →
anubis7–130.0019%4 Oct →
ancient13–10.1518%4 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.0115%4 Oct →
anubis9–130.0420%4 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0118%3 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0215%3 Oct →
cache10–130.0115%3 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0319%2 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0528%1 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.047%30 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0213%30 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0416%29 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0126%29 Sept →
mirage10–130.0223%29 Sept →
anubis8–130.0316%29 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0222%29 Sept →
ancient13–50.0123%28 Sept →
nuke16–140.0221%28 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0717%27 Sept →
mirage13–40.0147%26 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0620%25 Sept →
anubis13–100.0220%25 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0224%25 Sept →
dust213–60.0524%25 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0321%25 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0124%24 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0132%23 Sept →
cache10–130.0327%23 Sept →
cache13–110.0427%22 Sept →
nuke8–130.0632%22 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0523%22 Sept →
dust222–200.0529%21 Sept →
dust213–60.1134%21 Sept →
anubis10–130.0321%21 Sept →
mirage13–90.029%21 Sept →
ancient13–100.0212%21 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0325%21 Sept →
anubis13–90.0023%21 Sept →
ancient13–50.0624%20 Sept →
mirage13–0-0.0121%19 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0525%19 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0426%19 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0414%19 Sept →
anubis18–22-0.0421%18 Sept →
dust222–25-0.0314%18 Sept →
anubis13–60.0620%17 Sept →
dust211–130.0023%17 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0110%17 Sept →
dust213–50.0214%16 Sept →
mirage17–190.0111%16 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0319%15 Sept →
anubis13–50.0023%14 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0327%14 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0723%14 Sept →
anubis13–100.0417%13 Sept →
cache13–30.0629%13 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0418%13 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0219%12 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0811%12 Sept →
mirage13–90.0216%11 Sept →
ancient13–60.0314%11 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0114%10 Sept →
cache13–50.0133%9 Sept →
mirage13–110.0120%8 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0523%7 Sept →
dust29–130.0219%2 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0623%2 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0338%2 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0126%25 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0114%25 Aug →
mirage13–00.0429%18 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0419%18 Aug →
nuke9–130.0623%17 Aug →
mirage1–12-0.1114%7 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0413%4 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0648%3 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0215%3 Aug →
mirage7–130.0125%3 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0022%31 Jul →
nuke5–8-0.0510%24 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0321%24 Jul →
ancient13–100.0218%16 Jul →
ancient11–130.0330%16 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0317%13 Jul →
dust213–110.0315%10 Jul →
mirage13–40.0024%10 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0313%10 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0523%9 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.