oxide

oxide — CS2 Stats

FI76561198205862377[U:1:245596649]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,383Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,088 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,088 → 2,088
+7Tracked matches · now 4,383
+3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 9 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,088 +0 31 Aug5 Sept · 2 observations
2,0882,088peak 2,08831 Aug5 Sept
26,402Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,088Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-04-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,088
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 412 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGoxideFACEITLevel 10 · 2,088 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,088csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning62
Utility80

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56413Last 10056%Win rateLLLWWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −91ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility8.0
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels7.1
Clutch3.8

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Utility. Utility score of 80 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.2
Utility8.0
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time548ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 7 May
36%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · inferno, 30 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 1 Jul
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 23 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
115In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 76% over 21nukeWeakest map · 38% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC26101638%0.01
infernoA2213959%0.00
ancientS2116576%0.00
anubisB126650%0.01
mirageA117464%0.00
cache4040%-0.00
overpass330100%0.00
dust2110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,546Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
81.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno27155%1.1517.3
Nuke26960%1.3016.9
Ancient24750%1.0715.8
Anubis18641%1.0415.2
Mirage14442%1.0114.6
Vertigo6650%1.1416.1
Overpass6248%1.1216.7
Dust25435%1.0716.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
12.3°Preaim
532msReaction time
41.0%T opening success
62.8%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
14.3%Flash assists
9.89HE damage / grenade
19.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.3259° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–130.0325%10 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0428%8 Sept
mirage11–130.0323%8 Sept
ancient13–100.0324%8 Sept
mirage13–90.0221%6 Sept
nuke13–30.0912%6 Sept
inferno13–50.0117%6 Sept
mirage13–60.0125%4 Sept
anubis11–130.0118%4 Sept
nuke9–130.0125%4 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0722%1 Sept
inferno2–9-0.1336%30 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0231%23 Aug
inferno9–70.065%23 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0223%19 Aug
nuke14–160.097%12 Aug
nuke13–80.0115%12 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0914%10 Aug
ancient13–110.0418%10 Aug
inferno9–60.1015%10 Aug
anubis13–90.0217%6 Aug
ancient13–40.0314%6 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0323%6 Aug
inferno13–30.0728%6 Aug
nuke13–90.0517%6 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0810%3 Aug
inferno13–110.0415%3 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1715%3 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0716%3 Aug
nuke16–120.0519%26 Jul
mirage7–130.0316%26 Jul
anubis10–13-0.039%26 Jul
anubis13–70.0121%26 Jul
ancient13–110.0116%26 Jul
ancient13–110.0515%26 Jul
nuke9–130.0318%26 Jul
anubis13–80.0518%22 Jul
inferno13–100.0520%7 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0613%7 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0213%7 Jul
ancient13–70.0112%6 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0517%6 Jul
mirage25–22-0.0422%6 Jul
ancient13–80.0918%3 Jul
overpass13–80.0421%3 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0112%3 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0718%1 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0313%1 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0621%1 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0320%1 Jul
mirage13–90.0224%30 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0229%30 Jun
ancient13–90.0527%30 Jun
anubis7–13-0.059%30 Jun
overpass13–80.017%23 Jun
inferno13–90.0122%23 Jun
nuke13–00.0329%23 Jun
ancient6–130.0113%21 Jun
inferno13–100.0027%21 Jun
cache11–13-0.0332%21 Jun
nuke13–90.0313%21 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0113%11 Jun
ancient3–00.000%11 Jun
ancient15–19-0.019%7 Jun
mirage16–130.0213%28 May
nuke13–50.0316%28 May
anubis10–130.0316%28 May
nuke13–90.0323%28 May
ancient10–130.0222%25 May
inferno13–90.0316%25 May
mirage12–16-0.0422%21 May
inferno8–13-0.0320%21 May
mirage13–110.0117%20 May
inferno13–9-0.049%20 May
nuke13–60.0217%20 May
nuke6–9-0.0416%20 May
ancient16–14-0.0412%18 May
cache10–13-0.0022%18 May
nuke5–13-0.0211%13 May
dust213–110.0217%13 May
cache9–130.1026%13 May
cache12–12-0.066%7 May
inferno8–80.0419%7 May
inferno9–40.1614%7 May
inferno13–7-0.0011%6 May
anubis16–13-0.0417%6 May
ancient13–50.0420%6 May
anubis13–70.1023%5 May
nuke8–80.0015%3 May
nuke3–9-0.0016%3 May
ancient16–14-0.0612%26 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0324%20 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0115%17 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0114%17 Apr
anubis13–60.0913%17 Apr
nuke13–80.0717%17 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0313%15 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0321%15 Apr
overpass16–14-0.0411%9 Apr
ancient13–60.0512%9 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →