hermit crab

hermit crab — CS2 Stats

76561198077781426[U:1:117515698]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,356Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,431Purple band · top ~18.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,859 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 2 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,431 -4,886 2 May8 Sept · 20 days played
17,43122,691peak 22,6912 May8 Sept
23,436Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,859Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-05-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,859
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 142 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,260 below peak (22,691)
  • -2,462 over 30 days · declining
  • -4,712 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,569 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhermit crabFACEITLevel 6 · 1,859 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,431 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,859csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning39
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49447Last 10049%Win rateWLWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · −54ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility5.6
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning3.9
Utility5.6
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time624ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 12–12 · nuke, 6 Jul
41%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · ancient, 9 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 13 Sept
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 23 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9cacheWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2291341%-0.02
mirageB178947%-0.03
nukeS1711665%0.01
infernoB137654%-0.01
dust2D113827%-0.03
anubisS97278%-0.01
cacheD82625%-0.02
overpass32167%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,209Matches
50%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
73.6ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno16954%0.8813.4
Nuke15964%0.9614.0
Ancient14945%0.8113.0
Anubis11439%0.8513.4
Mirage8334%0.8313.0
Vertigo5250%0.8113.0
Overpass4347%0.9517.6
Dust23633%0.9214.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
69.2%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
604msReaction time
21.4%T opening success
45.6%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
7.73HE damage / grenade
10.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.3612% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–12-0.0316%13 Sept
mirage9–130.0225%13 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0011%13 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0419%13 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0321%8 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0812%8 Sept
cache4–13-0.0512%8 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0718%8 Sept
nuke13–30.0120%6 Sept
inferno13–50.0014%6 Sept
ancient13–6-0.075%9 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0341%9 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0640%9 Aug
dust24–13-0.0627%9 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0711%9 Aug
inferno13–8-0.057%9 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0819%9 Aug
nuke13–70.0724%9 Aug
mirage5–13-0.110%9 Aug
ancient9–13-0.079%9 Aug
mirage13–30.0412%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0718%4 Aug
nuke13–110.0519%3 Aug
nuke13–70.0222%3 Aug
ancient13–11-0.019%3 Aug
inferno13–100.0712%3 Aug
nuke13–5-0.060%3 Aug
ancient15–150.0217%2 Aug
nuke13–40.056%30 Jul
mirage13–90.0225%30 Jul
cache14–16-0.0616%30 Jul
cache13–110.0326%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0415%30 Jul
mirage13–110.015%30 Jul
mirage8–130.0112%30 Jul
inferno11–130.0119%28 Jul
inferno13–160.0316%28 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0311%28 Jul
ancient6–13-0.067%28 Jul
dust211–13-0.028%28 Jul
cache1–13-0.008%28 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0325%28 Jul
cache8–13-0.0313%28 Jul
ancient13–70.0716%28 Jul
ancient13–90.0516%28 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0320%28 Jul
dust213–8-0.0110%28 Jul
cache13–11-0.0517%28 Jul
nuke13–50.079%28 Jul
mirage0–5-0.070%28 Jul
anubis13–80.0515%22 Jul
cache15–150.0024%22 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0610%20 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0330%20 Jul
ancient2–13-0.1113%11 Jul
nuke12–120.1012%6 Jul
ancient13–80.059%3 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0216%3 Jul
ancient13–20.0119%3 Jul
dust24–13-0.0325%2 Jul
ancient13–90.0316%2 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0720%1 Jul
dust26–13-0.0411%1 Jul
dust216–12-0.0311%25 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0620%24 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0226%23 Jun
inferno13–90.0020%23 Jun
nuke13–00.0925%23 Jun
anubis13–60.0212%22 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0215%21 Jun
dust29–13-0.0616%11 Jun
anubis8–130.0016%9 Jun
mirage13–20.0021%8 Jun
ancient15–19-0.0211%7 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0327%6 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0713%6 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0015%6 Jun
anubis13–80.0412%6 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0425%6 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0217%6 Jun
inferno13–80.0718%6 Jun
dust213–4-0.0116%5 Jun
mirage13–9-0.098%3 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0514%2 Jun
nuke11–130.0434%2 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0130%28 May
nuke13–8-0.0418%28 May
dust26–13-0.0820%21 May
dust211–130.0217%21 May
ancient6–13-0.0222%21 May
cache12–12-0.0219%7 May
inferno8–8-0.0520%7 May
anubis13–7-0.0415%5 May
nuke8–8-0.0226%3 May
nuke3–9-0.178%3 May
inferno7–13-0.0731%2 May
dust29–13-0.0311%2 May
inferno13–40.0129%2 May
nuke9–13-0.0620%2 May
anubis13–11-0.0417%2 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →