kacpersky

kacpersky — CS2 Stats

IM76561198205773728[U:1:245508000]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,396Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,621Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,818Blue band · top ~29.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,384 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 10 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,818 -5,061 10 Aug5 Sept · 21 days played
14,72721,956peak 21,95610 Aug5 Sept
21,956Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,384Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2025-08-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,384
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 147 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 7,138 below peak (21,956)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 182 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 8 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 8 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate48.3%45.8%46.8%above
Shot accuracy13.7%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.921.051.060.14 short
Match win rate39.6%45.7%46.3%6.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkacperskyFACEITLevel 7 · 1,384 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER14,818 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,384csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning45
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45532Last 10045%Win rateLWLLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility5.2
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.5
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time625ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 625ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 22 Jan
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · cache, 4 Sept
313msFastest reaction time · 2–0 · cache, 4 Sept
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 24 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2891932%-0.02
ancientB1910953%-0.02
dust2C1981142%-0.02
anubisB105550%-0.03
nukeA74357%-0.02
infernoD72529%-0.02
overpassS64267%-0.07
train32167%0.04
cache110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

80,387Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
4,051Matches
39.6%Match win rate
48.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
7,065MVPs
1,621Hours (in match)
2,382Bombs planted
856Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,018
AWP8,640
P903,194
FAMAS2,030
Knife1,172

Lifetime map wins

5,955dust2
2,943nuke
2,535inferno
2,033vertigo
534train
308cbble
83office
63lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

848Matches
50%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
79.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15754%1.0315.2
Ancient7148%1.0215.7
Anubis6344%0.8815.1
Dust26250%0.9714.4
Nuke2548%1.1915.2
Inferno2259%1.3717.3
Vertigo1942%1.0418.2
Train771%0.9115.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
634msReaction time
30.2%T opening success
41.5%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
7.44HE damage / grenade
7.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.1872% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.094%5 Sept
dust213–20.0123%5 Sept
mirage7–130.0620%5 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0215%5 Sept
cache2–00.0150%4 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0320%3 Sept
mirage13–90.0010%3 Sept
dust213–90.0319%2 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0414%2 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0114%1 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0519%31 Aug
dust213–90.0225%31 Aug
ancient13–110.0217%30 Aug
mirage13–110.0219%30 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0316%27 Aug
dust213–100.0325%26 Aug
ancient3–130.019%25 Aug
dust24–13-0.0325%25 Aug
dust216–14-0.0018%24 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0232%24 Aug
anubis6–130.0514%23 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0418%18 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0923%17 Apr
mirage6–130.0034%17 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0613%8 Apr
anubis4–13-0.1319%8 Apr
anubis13–2-0.076%8 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0833%28 Mar
nuke12–160.0021%18 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0725%17 Mar
dust24–130.0417%17 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0229%17 Mar
mirage13–100.0117%5 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0717%4 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0414%4 Feb
mirage13–50.1019%4 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0310%30 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0115%28 Jan
mirage14–16-0.0215%28 Jan
mirage1–60.0220%25 Jan
dust213–11-0.0326%25 Jan
overpass13–6-0.0716%25 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0535%25 Jan
dust25–130.0222%25 Jan
anubis10–13-0.015%24 Jan
nuke13–1-0.0430%24 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0514%24 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0520%24 Jan
nuke13–100.0524%24 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0716%23 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0321%22 Jan
ancient13–9-0.0114%22 Jan
anubis13–60.0833%22 Jan
ancient13–10.1326%22 Jan
mirage4–13-0.045%19 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0413%19 Jan
train9–13-0.0217%19 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0110%19 Jan
mirage13–3-0.057%19 Jan
mirage13–80.0116%19 Jan
dust213–5-0.0216%19 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0121%19 Jan
train5–00.0921%19 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0619%19 Jan
dust20–13-0.0515%19 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0235%19 Jan
mirage11–13-0.066%18 Jan
dust26–13-0.0817%18 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0216%18 Jan
ancient13–100.019%18 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0222%17 Jan
mirage13–70.0315%17 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0518%15 Jan
train13–70.0625%15 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0212%15 Jan
overpass13–7-0.0313%9 Jan
dust28–13-0.0319%4 Jan
mirage13–8-0.040%4 Jan
dust25–13-0.0917%4 Jan
inferno5–13-0.035%27 Dec
overpass3–13-0.1612%27 Dec
dust27–13-0.078%27 Dec
ancient3–12-0.0412%17 Nov
ancient13–90.0320%12 Sept
dust26–13-0.080%8 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0217%4 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0336%2 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0415%1 Sept
inferno13–80.0421%27 Aug
overpass13–6-0.058%24 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0315%24 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0112%24 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0238%21 Aug
overpass13–4-0.0833%21 Aug
dust210–130.0221%17 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0416%13 Aug
dust216–13-0.0721%12 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0117%11 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0620%10 Aug
dust25–13-0.0411%10 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →