bromeq

bromeq — CS2 Stats

BL76561198181577349[U:1:221311621]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,303Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,549Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating19,895Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#75920 of 221299 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,499 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 11 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,895 -5,736 16 Feb17 Sept · 14 days played
19,89525,631peak 25,63116 Feb17 Sept
25,747Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,499Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-02-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,499
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 1 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,736 below peak (25,631)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 105 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 1 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=25,925), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate30.2%51.0%
Shot accuracy13.4%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.081.09
Match win rate49.1%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbromeqFACEITLevel 10 · 2,499 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER19,895 · Purple bandPEAK ELO2,499csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning51
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46495Last 10046%Win rateLWLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.07), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.4
Utility5.2
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.1
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time554ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–5 · nuke, 18 Jul
45%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · inferno, 29 Aug
344msFastest reaction time · 0–9 · inferno, 20 Aug
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 25anubisWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA25151060%0.02
ancientB21111052%-0.01
anubisD1331023%0.01
infernoB115645%-0.06
nukeD113827%0.01
dust2B63350%0.03
cacheA53260%0.01
overpass42250%-0.03
vertigo31233%0.11
debris1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

308,757Lifetime kills
1.08K/D
8,589Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players
30.2%Headshot %
13.4%Shot accuracy
26,750MVPs
3,549Hours (in match)
7,155Bombs planted
3,164Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47163,402
AWP16,588
P2505,417
Knife3,846
FAMAS3,765
MP93,352

Lifetime map wins

7,157dust2
5,247inferno
4,741vertigo
2,480nuke
2,128train
1,653cbble
152office
129italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,644Matches
52%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
81.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient38153%1.0516.4
Anubis34356%1.0616.1
Mirage28649%1.0715.6
Vertigo12753%1.0317.0
Dust29545%0.9413.7
Overpass8149%0.9715.1
Nuke3936%0.8814.6
Train3650%1.0315.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
553msReaction time
37.9%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
11.6%Flash assists
8.58HE damage / grenade
6.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8587% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.0326%5 Sept
dust213–20.1218%5 Sept
mirage7–130.067%5 Sept
mirage3–130.029%5 Sept
ancient11–130.0320%3 Sept
mirage13–90.029%3 Sept
dust213–90.0924%2 Sept
mirage8–130.0310%2 Sept
anubis13–110.0120%1 Sept
ancient8–130.1518%31 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0311%30 Aug
mirage13–110.0220%30 Aug
cache13–50.0513%30 Aug
mirage13–80.0419%30 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1745%29 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0120%23 Aug
ancient16–130.0313%20 Aug
dust213–90.0721%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0718%20 Aug
inferno0–9-0.280%20 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0014%20 Aug
ancient7–13-0.1317%16 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0323%16 Aug
inferno1–13-0.079%15 Aug
mirage7–130.0136%6 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0020%2 Aug
dust24–13-0.0712%2 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0423%2 Aug
anubis3–130.0217%26 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0524%18 Jul
nuke7–90.0419%18 Jul
vertigo6–90.0214%18 Jul
debris8–80.0328%18 Jul
nuke9–50.2521%18 Jul
inferno4–9-0.0525%18 Jul
overpass1–9-0.1328%18 Jul
inferno13–90.0222%12 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0123%12 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0220%12 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0424%12 Jul
nuke9–50.0121%13 May
cache13–110.0415%11 May
cache10–13-0.0024%11 May
cache11–13-0.0124%6 May
cache13–2-0.0122%2 May
anubis4–130.0219%2 May
inferno7–9-0.1526%21 Apr
inferno9–2-0.0225%21 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0411%21 Apr
ancient11–130.0113%21 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0630%17 Apr
mirage6–13-0.1127%17 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0314%18 Mar
nuke12–160.0523%18 Mar
mirage15–15-0.031%17 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0311%17 Mar
dust24–130.0524%17 Mar
mirage15–150.0525%17 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0215%14 Mar
ancient13–50.0816%14 Mar
mirage13–100.0925%14 Mar
mirage13–110.0318%14 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0413%14 Mar
vertigo8–80.0816%13 Mar
anubis15–150.1016%13 Mar
ancient13–80.0218%13 Mar
nuke4–130.0320%13 Mar
mirage13–90.0414%11 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0517%8 Mar
anubis16–140.0522%7 Mar
anubis11–130.0221%1 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0119%1 Mar
mirage13–50.0521%1 Mar
mirage13–50.0322%28 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0116%28 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0521%28 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0120%21 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0114%19 Feb
ancient13–7-0.025%19 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0416%19 Feb
nuke9–40.0225%18 Feb
nuke2–9-0.1421%18 Feb
inferno9–50.0417%18 Feb
mirage11–130.0116%18 Feb
dust22–13-0.0524%18 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0111%18 Feb
ancient13–70.0218%18 Feb
overpass13–110.0211%17 Feb
inferno9–10.1124%16 Feb
vertigo9–10.2329%16 Feb
nuke14–160.0225%16 Feb
ancient13–90.0018%16 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0417%16 Feb
mirage0–13-0.0412%15 Feb
overpass11–13-0.0316%15 Feb
anubis13–80.0326%14 Feb
mirage13–30.1631%13 Feb
anubis2–13-0.0627%12 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0219%12 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0210%11 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →