pozdrowka nara

pozdrowka nara — CS2 Stats

CG76561198062924705[U:1:102658977]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,514Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,357Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,881 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,881 → 1,881
+2Tracked matches · now 1,514
0.0ppWin rate · 38.5% → 38.5%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 22 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,536 -5,577 2 Feb1 Jul · 23 days played
19,40126,006peak 26,0062 Feb1 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,881 +0 5 Sept8 Sept · 2 observations
1,8811,881peak 1,8815 Sept8 Sept
26,006Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,881Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-01-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,881
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 120 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches20
Win rate50%
K/D0.65
Headshot %55%

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 8 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate44.4%48.3%51.0%6.5% short
Shot accuracy11.3%13.2%13.7%2.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.071.090.14 short
Match win rate48.7%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpozdrowka naraFACEITLevel 9 · 1,881 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,881csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning34
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39538Last 10039%Win rateLWLWWLLLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · −67ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 5123 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility6.8
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 656ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning3.4
Utility6.8
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact1.2

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time653ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–9 · dust2, 1 Mar
67%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 25 Mar
375msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 26 Feb
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 25 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
911In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 23% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2662023%-0.02
ancientC1881044%-0.00
dust2B179853%-0.03
anubisS128467%0.01
nukeD103730%-0.02
infernoD82625%-0.02
cacheD62433%-0.01
sanctum1010%-0.04
poseidon1010%-0.14
overpass110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

81,516Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
4,283Matches
48.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
44.4%Headshot %
11.3%Shot accuracy
10,606MVPs
1,891Hours (in match)
3,765Bombs planted
1,388Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,937
AWP8,798
P902,043
Knife1,656
Tec-91,221
FAMAS1,137

Lifetime map wins

5,216dust2
3,508inferno
2,422nuke
1,989vertigo
1,244train
403cbble
139office
79dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

937Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
79.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19053%0.9915.4
Ancient15253%1.0014.9
Anubis14148%0.9814.6
Dust26053%0.9714.6
Vertigo5355%1.0215.5
Nuke2148%1.0316.0
Inferno1724%0.7613.0
Train1771%1.3913.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.2%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
656msReaction time
23.9%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
7.98HE damage / grenade
15.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.9303% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2–13-0.0421%16 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0224%8 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0517%3 Sept
mirage13–90.0722%3 Sept
dust213–9-0.119%2 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0318%2 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0024%31 Aug
dust28–13-0.0526%24 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0716%12 Aug
ancient13–40.0913%10 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0314%23 Jul
cache2–13-0.0318%19 Jul
dust27–13-0.099%19 Jul
cache2–13-0.0519%18 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1218%9 Jul
inferno12–120.0218%9 Jul
anubis15–150.0314%1 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0917%1 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0321%1 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0017%23 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0521%23 Jun
dust213–70.0029%23 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0825%15 Jun
ancient13–80.0416%15 Jun
anubis13–110.0424%15 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0423%5 Jun
cache5–13-0.0147%4 Jun
cache5–13-0.0229%1 Jun
mirage11–130.0010%1 Jun
dust213–110.0423%20 May
nuke4–13-0.0813%20 May
ancient8–13-0.0027%20 May
anubis13–9-0.0529%17 May
cache13–110.0830%11 May
dust211–130.0547%6 May
cache13–9-0.0112%6 May
ancient5–13-0.0511%6 May
mirage7–13-0.0625%5 May
dust213–90.0117%5 May
anubis10–130.0522%27 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0120%24 Apr
dust21–13-0.0814%24 Apr
inferno4–130.0220%21 Apr
ancient11–130.0025%21 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0512%18 Apr
nuke5–13-0.057%17 Apr
mirage6–130.0725%17 Apr
nuke6–130.0237%13 Apr
ancient11–130.0116%7 Apr
ancient12–160.0330%7 Apr
dust213–11-0.0421%7 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0318%6 Apr
mirage11–130.0219%4 Apr
dust213–10-0.0316%3 Apr
sanctum8–8-0.0413%31 Mar
poseidon3–9-0.145%31 Mar
mirage9–130.0220%31 Mar
mirage13–100.0321%25 Mar
dust213–20.0267%25 Mar
ancient13–5-0.0028%23 Mar
mirage15–15-0.079%17 Mar
anubis8–130.0432%17 Mar
dust24–13-0.0614%17 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0728%17 Mar
anubis13–90.0325%8 Mar
nuke13–40.0933%8 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0416%8 Mar
dust25–13-0.0322%8 Mar
dust213–90.1224%1 Mar
ancient2–13-0.099%26 Feb
dust210–13-0.0022%26 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0322%25 Feb
inferno13–50.0724%19 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0928%18 Feb
dust22–13-0.1215%18 Feb
mirage11–130.0121%18 Feb
inferno9–13-0.058%18 Feb
nuke14–16-0.0411%16 Feb
ancient13–90.0118%16 Feb
ancient8–130.0813%16 Feb
mirage12–12-0.0217%15 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0533%15 Feb
mirage13–100.067%15 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0219%4 Feb
mirage13–50.0521%4 Feb
anubis13–11-0.048%2 Feb
ancient13–100.0114%2 Feb
dust213–10-0.0516%2 Feb
anubis13–110.0311%30 Jan
mirage6–4-0.0227%28 Jan
nuke13–10-0.1111%28 Jan
mirage14–160.0215%28 Jan
anubis13–30.0015%26 Jan
overpass13–60.0120%25 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0021%25 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0515%24 Jan
nuke13–100.0327%24 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0611%22 Jan
ancient13–9-0.0421%22 Jan
anubis13–60.0522%22 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →