Topias

Topias — CS2 Stats

SE76561198205727052[U:1:245461324]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

889Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,642Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,929 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 889 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 22 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,731 +5,296 29 Jan27 Feb · 12 days played
17,43523,624peak 23,62429 Jan27 Feb
24,329Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,929Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-01-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,929
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 72 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 16 Sep 2026 and 21 Sep 2026.

Measured 16 Sep 202621 Sep 2026; previous 8 Sep 2026 → 16 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate43.6%48.3%51.0%7.4% short
Shot accuracy13.1%13.2%13.7%0.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.071.090.11 short
Match win rate43.1%46.9%48.4%5.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTopiasFACEITLevel 9 · 1,929 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,929csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning52
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48466Last 10048%Win rateLLWWWLTLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility5.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.2
Utility5.6
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact0.2

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time600ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–8 · nuke, 13 Sept
35%Best headshot accuracy · 6–2 · dust2, 13 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 16 Feb
13–3Biggest win · dust2, 19 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7ancientWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC23101343%-0.01
nukeS1611569%0.02
ancientD1551033%-0.02
infernoC125742%0.00
overpassB84450%-0.01
anubisS76186%0.00
dust242250%0.06
vertigo42250%0.02
train3030%-0.02
cache31233%0.06
office21150%-0.00
poseidon1010%0.02
shelter1010%0.02
italy110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

88,270Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
4,731Matches
43.1%Match win rate
43.6%Headshot %
13.1%Shot accuracy
9,914MVPs
1,703Hours (in match)
3,089Bombs planted
1,274Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,515
AWP8,173
SG 5533,350
MP92,965
MAC-101,776

Lifetime map wins

6,874inferno
4,715nuke
3,764train
2,982dust2
2,475vertigo
665office
309cbble
304lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

644Matches
53%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
79.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10150%1.0616.9
Ancient5949%1.0316.1
Nuke4648%1.0615.0
Anubis4065%1.0916.5
Inferno3959%1.1116.2
Dust23152%0.9614.5
Train1471%0.9415.4
Vertigo1070%1.5217.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
70.2%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
602msReaction time
41.8%T opening success
39.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
8.12HE damage / grenade
9.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.7874% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–130.0211%14 Sept
ancient7–13-0.027%13 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0515%13 Sept
nuke13–80.2122%13 Sept
dust26–20.1735%13 Sept
poseidon6–90.0212%10 Sept
train12–12-0.0415%10 Sept
ancient5–13-0.018%10 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0314%10 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0315%10 Sept
vertigo13–100.0113%10 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0216%9 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0416%9 Sept
anubis13–60.0119%9 Sept
cache7–13-0.0222%9 Sept
overpass8–130.0411%8 Sept
ancient13–80.0114%8 Sept
cache3–130.0317%8 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0024%8 Sept
shelter5–130.0225%6 Sept
italy13–110.0917%6 Sept
cache13–90.1816%6 Sept
overpass11–130.0310%6 Sept
vertigo3–13-0.0223%6 Sept
office3–13-0.0620%6 Sept
train12–12-0.0612%27 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0215%27 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0217%24 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0421%24 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0414%22 Feb
dust24–13-0.0520%22 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0413%22 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0517%22 Feb
nuke13–100.048%22 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0810%22 Feb
mirage13–60.0019%22 Feb
nuke13–60.0115%22 Feb
vertigo9–70.0423%21 Feb
nuke8–8-0.0615%21 Feb
inferno4–90.0316%21 Feb
mirage13–80.0117%21 Feb
overpass16–13-0.0914%21 Feb
mirage13–70.0119%21 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0513%21 Feb
dust213–30.0023%19 Feb
inferno16–14-0.0415%19 Feb
vertigo11–130.0413%16 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0513%16 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0124%15 Feb
nuke1–13-0.0913%13 Feb
anubis13–30.038%11 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0417%11 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0715%10 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0418%10 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0612%8 Feb
inferno14–16-0.0716%8 Feb
ancient13–50.0217%8 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0021%8 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0216%8 Feb
overpass13–100.0116%8 Feb
nuke13–100.0216%8 Feb
mirage13–50.0121%8 Feb
nuke16–120.0120%7 Feb
anubis13–70.0917%4 Feb
mirage11–130.0419%4 Feb
ancient9–130.0215%3 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0517%3 Feb
inferno9–130.0325%3 Feb
ancient13–10-0.018%3 Feb
nuke13–50.0217%3 Feb
nuke13–80.0517%3 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0011%2 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0313%2 Feb
nuke13–30.0231%2 Feb
inferno3–130.0124%2 Feb
mirage13–80.0114%2 Feb
ancient10–13-0.039%29 Jan
inferno13–50.1519%29 Jan
mirage13–30.0921%29 Jan
nuke16–140.0015%29 Jan
mirage4–13-0.018%29 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0029%28 Jan
inferno13–100.0218%28 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0316%28 Jan
inferno13–80.0114%25 Jan
mirage12–16-0.0019%24 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0121%24 Jan
ancient15–15-0.078%24 Jan
mirage10–130.048%24 Jan
anubis7–130.0211%24 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0815%24 Jan
nuke6–130.0516%24 Jan
office13–90.0615%23 Jan
ancient13–100.0118%23 Jan
nuke13–100.0420%23 Jan
mirage6–130.0124%22 Jan
overpass8–130.0019%22 Jan
dust212–120.1227%22 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0123%22 Jan
train12–120.0522%22 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →