Shoebox Renter

Shoebox Renter — CS2 Stats

PL76561198205302436[U:1:245036708]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,019Tracked matches40%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,966 → 1,966
+9Tracked matches · now 2,019
−1.7ppWin rate · 41.7% → 40.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 24 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,324 -267 27 Jun2 Jul · 4 days played
20,32420,634peak 20,63427 Jun2 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,966 +0 29 Aug10 Sept · 2 observations
1,9661,966peak 1,96629 Aug10 Sept
20,700Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,966Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-06-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,966
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 35 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShoebox RenterPEAK ELO1,966csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning53
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY36559Last 10036%Win rateWLWWLTWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 442 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 5114 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.7
Utility4.4
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.3
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time574ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 3 Aug
36%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 4 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · nuke, 12 Sept
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 8 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
713In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 48% over 54infernoWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB54262848%0.01
infernoD81713%-0.01
mirageD72529%-0.04
ancientD62433%0.01
dust241325%-0.03
italy4040%-0.00
vertigo3030%-0.04
cache3030%0.03
anubis3030%-0.05
train2020%0.02
overpass21150%-0.07
office110100%-0.02
shelter1010%-0.02
poseidon110100%-0.14
sanctum110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

290Matches
56%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
70.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke8464%1.0313.8
Ancient6050%0.8514.4
Overpass3664%0.8612.2
Inferno3551%0.9013.7
Mirage2839%0.7510.7
Vertigo1567%0.9212.6
Train1164%0.9513.1
Anubis1040%0.7910.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
565msReaction time
44.9%T opening success
43.6%CT opening success
0.31Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
6.40HE damage / grenade
11.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3052 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–9-0.0128%14 Sept
mirage5–13-0.069%13 Sept
nuke13–70.0620%13 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0019%12 Sept
inferno6–9-0.1314%12 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0114%9 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0116%9 Sept
train8–130.0222%7 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0415%7 Sept
mirage3–13-0.1113%6 Sept
dust212–12-0.0316%6 Sept
nuke10–10-0.0125%6 Sept
nuke12–120.1216%6 Sept
inferno7–9-0.0111%5 Sept
vertigo7–9-0.0323%5 Sept
overpass2–9-0.170%5 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0820%5 Sept
dust213–11-0.0219%2 Sept
italy1–13-0.0433%1 Sept
nuke3–130.0114%1 Sept
train11–130.0228%1 Sept
nuke6–130.0717%1 Sept
nuke4–130.0522%31 Aug
nuke13–90.0517%31 Aug
nuke13–110.0821%30 Aug
nuke4–130.0010%30 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0219%30 Aug
nuke12–120.0133%27 Aug
cache4–130.0220%26 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0113%26 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0812%26 Aug
office13–3-0.0226%25 Aug
nuke13–40.0624%25 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0615%25 Aug
nuke13–70.0218%25 Aug
nuke12–120.0325%24 Aug
nuke13–80.0111%23 Aug
nuke13–110.0924%23 Aug
italy11–130.088%14 Aug
nuke10–130.0215%14 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0613%11 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0721%11 Aug
shelter6–13-0.0219%10 Aug
nuke13–50.0518%10 Aug
ancient17–190.1019%10 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0112%10 Aug
nuke13–1-0.035%8 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0311%8 Aug
nuke13–100.0921%7 Aug
inferno8–130.0017%7 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0615%5 Aug
mirage7–130.0521%5 Aug
overpass9–30.0433%5 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0411%5 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0330%5 Aug
mirage5–13-0.049%5 Aug
nuke11–130.0620%4 Aug
italy8–130.0424%4 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0436%4 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0316%4 Aug
nuke13–30.2326%3 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0026%3 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0426%2 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0225%1 Aug
nuke9–130.0831%30 Jul
italy0–3-0.070%30 Jul
dust211–13-0.0628%30 Jul
nuke8–130.0629%30 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0529%29 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0328%29 Jul
nuke16–13-0.049%29 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.0219%29 Jul
nuke13–30.0427%29 Jul
inferno8–10.1132%29 Jul
vertigo8–13-0.0616%6 Jul
nuke13–50.1014%6 Jul
nuke13–60.0225%6 Jul
nuke8–20.0036%5 Jul
ancient13–60.0218%5 Jul
cache11–130.0417%4 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0611%2 Jul
nuke4–13-0.1024%2 Jul
cache4–50.0324%30 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0714%30 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0314%29 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0115%29 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0412%29 Jun
nuke13–40.1320%29 Jun
nuke13–110.0830%29 Jun
inferno4–13-0.039%29 Jun
nuke13–10.0622%28 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0516%28 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0624%28 Jun
poseidon9–5-0.1412%28 Jun
sanctum9–60.0122%28 Jun
inferno15–150.0320%28 Jun
dust26–13-0.0114%27 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0522%27 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0220%26 Jun
nuke12–16-0.0218%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →