pointe — CS2 Stats
76561198204601467[U:1:244335739]✓ No bans
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | 19 | 5–14 | 26% | 0.03 | |
| C | 19 | 8–11 | 42% | 0.02 | |
| C | 18 | 8–10 | 44% | 0.05 | |
| B | 17 | 9–8 | 53% | 0.03 | |
| A | 12 | 7–5 | 58% | 0.04 | |
| D | 7 | 2–5 | 29% | 0.02 | |
| D | 6 | 2–4 | 33% | 0.03 | |
| — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.04 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dust2 | 62 | 52% | 1.52 | 19.6 |
| Mirage | 42 | 50% | 1.43 | 18.8 |
| Anubis | 36 | 56% | 1.55 | 21.5 |
| Ancient | 32 | 50% | 1.54 | 18.5 |
| Nuke | 29 | 55% | 1.52 | 20.4 |
| Cache | 18 | 61% | 1.65 | 23.4 |
| Inferno | 8 | 38% | 1.21 | 13.8 |
| Vertigo | 2 | 50% | 1.01 | 14.5 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4591 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.2103% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
26% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15–15 | -0.04 | 24% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.01 | 14% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.12 | 21% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.08 | 21% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 21% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.04 | 39% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.05 | 30% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.06 | 15% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.04 | 20% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.01 | 23% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 1–1 | -0.02 | 100% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.04 | 28% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.10 | 26% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.04 | 26% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 45% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.03 | 33% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.03 | 20% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 20% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.10 | 62% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.07 | 33% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.00 | 10% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.23 | 21% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.07 | 29% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.04 | 7% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.00 | 23% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 17–19 | 0.06 | 20% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.09 | 27% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.08 | 9% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.12 | 25% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.02 | 20% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.01 | 32% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 26% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.05 | 18% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 22% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.10 | 20% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.05 | 13% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 22% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 14% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.06 | 16% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.04 | 22% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.02 | 24% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.00 | 9% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.05 | 26% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.09 | 23% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.00 | 25% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.01 | 29% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 36% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 30% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.02 | 11% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 24% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.09 | 28% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.04 | 31% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.02 | 23% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.01 | 18% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 31% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 25% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.05 | 25% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.09 | 21% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 19–15 | 0.10 | 22% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.07 | 19% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.05 | 21% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.06 | 22% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.05 | 28% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 23% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.02 | 17% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.11 | 26% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 10% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 19–16 | 0.07 | 25% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.03 | 28% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.09 | 36% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 20% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.15 | 11% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.07 | 37% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.09 | 22% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 29% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.06 | 27% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.03 | 12% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.06 | 13% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 16–12 | 0.06 | 17% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.11 | 33% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 32% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.10 | 16% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.05 | 14% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.06 | 11% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 26% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.01 | 23% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.05 | 26% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.13 | 52% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.11 | 30% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.01 | 31% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.17 | 24% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 26% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 18% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.02 | 30% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.01 | 26% | 22 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.